How Much Do Political Campaigns Rely On Tv?

Political advertising is a cornerstone of any election campaign, and with the 2024 US presidential race ramping up, investment in political advertising is reaching new heights. With an estimated $16 billion going towards the political ad market in 2024, up from $12 billion in 2022, the competition for voters' attention is fierce. While digital channels are becoming increasingly popular, traditional media, especially TV, remains a top priority for campaigns, with ad spend on TV expected to rise by 7.9% and account for 71.9% of all spend.

Explore related products

Building Smart Cities

$44.79 $55.99

Popular Culture as Art and Knowledge: A Critique of Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Crisis of Democracy

$14.37 $35.99

Data-Driven Campaigning and Political Parties: Five Advanced Democracies Compared (Journalism and Political Communication Unbound)

$19.99 $28.99

DATA-DRIVEN MARKETING STRATEGIES : Optimize Marketing Campaigns with Data Analytics and Machine Learning Techniques

$2.99 $18.99

Campaign Code: Inside the Algorithms That Elect Leaders: Digital Persuasion, Data Warfare, and the Secret Machinery Driving Modern Elections

$12.99

Disproven: My Unbiased Search for Voter Fraud for the Trump Campaign, the Data that Shows Why He Lost, and How We Can Improve Our Elections

$13.21 $28

Local broadcast stations are expected to bring in $2.2 billion in TV digital political advertising in 2024

Local broadcast stations are expected to bring in a substantial amount of revenue from political advertising during the 2024 election cycle. According to estimates, these stations will generate around $2.2 billion in TV digital political advertising revenue. This significant influx of political ad spending is driven by several factors, including highly competitive congressional races, a closely contested presidential election, and a surge in state ballot measures.

The 2024 presidential election cycle is expected to attract a significant amount of political advertising spending, with local broadcast stations benefiting the most. The $2.2 billion in TV digital political advertising revenue projected for local stations represents a substantial increase from previous years. This can be attributed to the 2010 overturning of campaign finance restrictions, which led to unprecedented investment in U.S. elections, and the pandemic, which pushed more dollars into paid advertising as campaigns shifted their strategies.

While digital media is forecast to claim a significant portion of 2024's political ad spend, estimated at 28%, broadcast television still receives the highest amount of investment in political advertising. This is due in part to the finite inventory of local broadcast ad spots, making it a competitive and attractive option for political campaigns. Additionally, local broadcast stations have close ties with their communities, ensuring a dedicated audience for advertisers.

Connected TV (CTV) has emerged as a powerful channel for political advertisers, allowing them to target voters based on location and purchasing behavior. Despite the growing popularity of CTV, local broadcast executives believe that this year's election will result in record-breaking revenue for local stations. This optimism is supported by companies like E.W. Scripps, one of the largest owners of local broadcast stations, which anticipates record-high revenue due to Senate races in Montana and Ohio, as well as controversial ballot issues in several states.

In addition to political advertising, local broadcast stations are also benefiting from increased advertising in other sectors, such as automotive and legal services. The combination of heavy political ad spending and increased spending in these key television verticals is expected to drive significant growth for the local broadcast TV industry in 2024. According to BIA Advisory Services, the industry is projected to generate approximately $23.8 billion in total advertising revenue, with $21.7 billion in over-the-air (OTA) revenue and $2.1 billion in digital television revenue.

Local broadcast is the top place campaigns spend their ad dollars

The 2010 overturning of campaign finance restrictions, combined with the pandemic, has resulted in unprecedented investment in U.S. elections and a shift towards paid advertising. Competitive congressional races, a close presidential election, and an increase in state ballot measures have further driven ad opportunities for local broadcasters.

While campaigns are experimenting with new mediums, such as connected TV (CTV) ads, local broadcast still receives the highest amount of investment in political advertising. This is due to its effectiveness in persuading voters and its efficiency in reaching a large number of voters in a specific region. Local broadcast ads are also regulated to prevent bias, which benefits campaigns by offering cheaper rates and protecting their ads from being blocked due to inaccuracies or misinformation.

Local broadcast stations have historically benefited from significant increases in ad spending during even-numbered years, particularly around congressional elections. For example, E.W. Scripps, one of the largest owners of local broadcast stations, expects its 2024 local political advertising revenue to reach record levels due to Senate races and controversial ballot issues in several states.

Broadcast television receives the highest amount of investment in political advertising

Television has long been a powerful medium for political advertising, and this remains true in the digital age. Despite the rise of streaming platforms and digital media, broadcast television still attracts the highest amount of investment in political advertising. This is due to its ability to reach large numbers of voters in specific regions and its cost-effectiveness compared to other forms of advertising.

In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, local TV stations are expected to bring in a record amount of revenue from political advertising, with a projected $2.2 billion in "TV digital" advertising alone. This includes advertising sold by local broadcast stations on their digital properties, such as their websites or streaming apps. Local broadcast stations have historically benefited from increased ad spending during congressional election years, and this year is no exception. Competitive congressional races, a close presidential election, and controversial ballot measures have driven a surge in ad spending for local broadcasters.

While digital media and streaming platforms are gaining traction in the political advertising landscape, they often lack the scale and reach of broadcast television. Connected TV (CTV) advertising, for example, is becoming an increasingly popular channel for political advertisers to target voters based on their location and purchasing behavior. However, CTV ads are typically non-skippable and attract a younger demographic, which can be more challenging to reach through linear television. Despite these advancements, broadcast television maintains its dominance in the political advertising landscape due to its ability to reach a wider and more diverse audience.

The effectiveness of broadcast television in political advertising is evident in the spending patterns of political campaigns. In the 2024 U.S. presidential race, candidates invested heavily in broadcast TV advertising. For example, Kamala Harris's campaign spent nearly $1.2 billion on TV, digital, and radio advertising, outspending Trump's campaign, which invested $602 million in these areas. These figures highlight the continued importance of traditional media, especially television, in political advertising.

Explore related products

85 Prompts to be a Marketing Ninja with AI: A curated collection of prompts tailored for marketers, crafting compelling campaigns, and make data-driven decisions with ease.

$14.95

CONNECTING THROUGH DATA: Streamlining your direct-marketing campaigns through the use of targeted sales data.

$11.99

Easy Marketo Implementation for Complete Beginners: Master Marketing Automation Workflows With Simple Strategies For Building Organized Campaigns ... Managing Data And Running Scalable Programs

$14.96

The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns

$15.06 $19

Data Science for E-commerce Logistics and Advertising Optimization: A comprehensive guide covering forecasting, campaign analysis, and operational efficiency improvements.

$10 $10

Mastering Campaign Trading with Bull and Bear Diagonal Spreads: With ChatGPT Examples

$9.99 $19.95

Political advertisers can target voters based on their location and purchasing behaviour

Political advertising has evolved significantly over the years, with candidates and parties employing various media channels to reach voters. While traditional media, especially television, remains a dominant avenue for political ad spending, the shift towards digital and streaming platforms is becoming increasingly prominent. This shift has opened up new opportunities for political advertisers to target voters based on their location and purchasing behaviour.

Connected TV (CTV) has emerged as a powerful tool for political advertisers, with its non-skippable ads attracting viewers of all ages, particularly younger demographics that are harder to reach through linear television. The ability to target voters based on their location is a significant advantage of CTV, allowing advertisers to tailor their messages to specific geographic areas. This form of microtargeting enables campaigns to focus their efforts on specific regions or swing states, maximising the impact of their advertising spend.

In addition to location-based targeting, political advertisers can also leverage data on purchasing behaviour to segment voters into smaller groups for more precise targeting. This practice, known as microtargeting, involves using individuals' data, such as their demographics, interests, connections, and past purchases, to create tailored political messages. Microtargeting has been a controversial topic, with concerns raised about the ethical implications of using personal data for political advertising. However, it allows smaller and less-well-funded campaigns to reach voters more affordably and with more specific messages than traditional media.

Social media platforms, such as Facebook and Google, have played a pivotal role in the evolution of political advertising. They provide a vast array of user data that can be utilised for microtargeting, enabling campaigns to create highly customised ads. For instance, the Trump campaign in 2016 was revealed to have used data analytics from Cambridge Analytica to target individual US voters with personalised political ads. While Facebook and Google have since established different policies regarding microtargeting for political ads, the impact of this practice on voter perceptions and election outcomes cannot be understated.

In conclusion, political advertisers now have sophisticated tools at their disposal to target voters based on their location and purchasing behaviour. The rise of CTV and digital media platforms has shifted the landscape of political advertising, allowing campaigns to microtarget specific voter segments with tailored messages. While this practice has sparked debates around privacy and ethical concerns, it has also increased voter engagement and empowered smaller campaigns to reach their target audiences more effectively.

Political advertising can persuade voters if it provides novel information that affects their attitudes

Political advertising has been a staple of election campaigns for decades, with candidates investing heavily in television commercials to promote their platforms and sway public opinion in their favor. While the effectiveness of these ads has been debated, research suggests that they can indeed persuade voters, but the extent of their influence depends on various factors.

Television advertising has been a prominent feature of political campaigns, especially in the United States, where candidates spend millions of dollars on TV commercials during election seasons. For instance, during the 2024 presidential race, Kamala Harris's campaign invested nearly $1.2 billion in ads across TV, digital, and radio platforms, while her opponent, Donald Trump, spent $602 million.

Despite the significant investments in political advertising, some studies, like the one conducted by Yale political scientist Alexander Coppock, suggest that these ads have limited persuasive power over voters, regardless of their content, context, or audience. Coppock's study, which analyzed 49 high-profile ads from the 2016 presidential campaign, found that the ads had a negligible impact on voters' preferences, with an average increase in a candidate's favorability rating of only 0.05 points on a five-point scale.

However, other research, such as the work of Brett Gordon, a professor of marketing at Kellogg, challenges the notion that political ads have no influence. Gordon's studies indicate that TV ads can indeed influence voter turnout and choices, and the tone of the ad plays a crucial role. Positive ads were found to encourage higher voter turnout, while negative ads targeting opponents had a slightly suppressive effect. This finding is supported by another study that examined the effects of advertising on the Democratic candidate's vote share in presidential elections between 2000 and 2016. It concluded that a 100-airing advantage yielded an additional 0.158 percentage points of vote share, suggesting that advertising can have a measurable impact on election outcomes.

While the effectiveness of political advertising is still debated, it is important to recognize that advertising can provide novel information that shapes voters' attitudes. Media coverage, including political ads, is a primary source of information for voters to learn about candidates and their policies. This information can increase voters' knowledge, motivate supporters, and influence their perceptions of the candidates. Additionally, with the rise of digital media, political advertisers can now target specific voter segments based on demographics and psychographic characteristics, making it easier to reach voters with tailored messages.

In conclusion, while the impact of political advertising may vary, it can indeed persuade voters if it provides novel and relevant information that resonates with their beliefs and attitudes. The effectiveness of these ads depends on factors such as tone, timing, and the characteristics of the target audience. As media consumption continues to evolve, political campaigns will need to adapt their strategies to reach voters across traditional and digital platforms effectively.

Frequently asked questions