Anti-Federalists' Concern: Constitution's Troubling Clause

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. The Anti-Federalists' major concern was with the Supremacy Clause, which they believed would make the national government overly powerful and infringe on state sovereignty. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch. Their arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution to protect Americans' civil liberties.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.54 $8.95

The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers (Hackett Classics)

$10.59 $11

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Anti-Federalist Writings of the Melancton Smith Circle

$14.5 $29

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$5.59 $10

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Dispute: The Original Arguments For Each

$0.99 $25.13

Anti-Federalists feared the national government would be too powerful

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. The Anti-Federalists wanted a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states. They were composed of diverse elements, including those who opposed the Constitution because they believed it threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals. They also included those who saw in the proposed government a new centralized and "monarchic" power in disguise that would replicate the cast-off governance of Great Britain.

The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. They demanded a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties, and the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage critics and ensure the Constitution's successful ratification. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, introduced draft proposals for what would become the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution. The Anti-Federalists' efforts were not in vain, as their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists had several specific concerns about the excessive power of the national government. Firstly, they feared that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also worried that the national government would be too powerful and infringe on state sovereignty. They believed that the Supremacy Clause, which states that the Constitution and federal laws are the supreme law of the land, would force the country into one large system of lordly government and allow the federal government to prevent states from levying taxes and absorbing their powers.

Furthermore, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the role of the Senate in ratifying treaties without concurrence in the House of Representatives. They also feared that Congress was not large enough to adequately represent the people within the states and that it might seize too many powers under the necessary and proper clause and other open-ended provisions. They believed that the Constitution, as written, would be oppressive and that it needed a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties.

They believed the Constitution would threaten individual liberties

Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution would threaten individual liberties. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They advocated for a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states. Principally, they were afraid that the national government would be too robust and would, thus, threaten states and individual rights. In the broad Antifederalist sense, they held that states should be significantly autonomous and independent in their authority, applying the right to self-administration in all significant internal matters without the unwanted interjections of the federal government.

Anti-Federalists believed that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power invested in the national government at the expense of states. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one. They believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous. These arguments created a powerful current against adopting the Constitution in each of the states.

The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including those opposed to the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals; those that saw in the proposed government a new centralized and "monarchic" power in disguise that would replicate the cast-off governance of Great Britain; and those who simply feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties. Some of the opposition believed that the central government under the Articles of Confederation was sufficient. Still, others believed that while the national government under the Articles was too weak, the national government under the Constitution would be too strong.

The Anti-Federalists believed that the federal government's powers to tax provided by the Constitution could be used to exploit citizens and weaken the power of the states. They believed that a large central government would not serve the interests of small towns and rural areas, as opposed to the urban interests that most Federalist delegates aligned with. Generally, Anti-federalists were more likely to be small farmers than lawyers and merchants and came from rural areas rather than the urban areas many federalists represented.

Anti-Federalists wanted a more decentralised government

Anti-Federalists were a political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They wanted a more decentralised form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.

The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution to protect Americans' civil liberties. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, rather than a federal one. They were concerned that the national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties and states' rights. They also believed that a large central government would not serve the interests of small towns and rural areas, focusing instead on urban interests.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the Constitution was driven by their fear of excessive power in the hands of Congress and the national government. They believed that the unitary executive, or the position of the president, would evolve into a monarchy. They also had concerns about the role of the Senate in ratifying treaties without concurrence in the House of Representatives. Furthermore, they believed that the Constitution provided insufficient rights in the courts, such as no guarantee of juries in civil cases and local juries in criminal cases.

The Anti-Federalists, including small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers, favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. They saw the state governments as sovereign entities that should have significant autonomy and independence from the federal government. They advocated for a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties and limit the powers of the federal government.

Explore related products

Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers - Complete Edition: U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $1.99

Selected Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions)

$6.7 $5.95

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

The Odd Clauses: Understanding the Constitution Through Ten of Its Most Curious Provisions

$13.99 $18

The Founders’ Constitution: The Preamble Through Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4

$14.5

They believed the Supremacy Clause would infringe on state sovereignty

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They advocated for a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states. Principally, they were afraid that the national government would be too powerful and would, thus, threaten states and individual rights.

The Supremacy Clause generated significant controversy during debates over the Constitution's ratification. Anti-Federalists argued that the Clause would make the national government overly powerful and infringe on state sovereignty. One Anti-Federalist contended that the Clause would force the country into "one large system of lordly government". Another critic similarly argued that the Constitution would bring about a "complete consolidation of all of the states into one". Some Anti-Federalists framed this criticism as a conceptual argument, asserting that two sovereigns could not exist within the same territory, and that one would necessarily destroy the other.

Anti-Federalists also believed that the Supremacy Clause, in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses, would allow implied powers that could endanger rights. They argued that a bill of rights was necessary to protect individual liberties. They believed that without a federal bill of rights, the Supremacy Clause would allow the federal government to override state constitutional guarantees of individual liberties. One opponent claimed that the Supremacy Clause would allow the federal government to prevent states from levying taxes and thereby absorb their powers.

Anti-Federalists wanted a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They wanted a weak central government, strong state governments, and greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.

The Anti-Federalists' primary concern was the excessive power of the national government at the expense of state governments. They believed that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also believed that the Constitution, as written, would be oppressive and that it needed a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties. They argued that the Supremacy Clause, in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses, would allow implied powers that could endanger rights.

The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. In response to their demands, the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, introduced draft proposals of what would become the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution and advocated for their passage. The debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists brought to light the importance of freedom of speech and press in achieving national consensus.

Frequently asked questions