The Legal Definition Of Treason: A Constitutional Overview

Treason is the only crime defined in the U.S. Constitution. The Framers of the Constitution wanted to create a restrictive concept of the crime of treason to prevent the ruling class from using it to eliminate their political dissidents. The U.S. Constitution defines treason as levying war against the United States or providing aid and comfort to its enemies. The federal treason statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2381, imposes a minimum penalty of five years' imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. A conviction also bars the defendant from holding any federal office and carries the possibility of the death penalty.

Explore related products

Secession on Trial: The Treason Prosecution of Jefferson Davis (Studies in Legal History)

$26.73 $35

Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (Constitutional Thinking)

$20.19 $59.99

The Treason Trials of Aaron Burr (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$29.99 $29.99

Thirteen Charges Against Benedict Arnold: The Accusations of Colonel John Brown Prior to the Act of Treason

$27.99 $45

The Trials of Allegiance: Treason, Juries, and the American Revolution

$38.63 $47.99

No Treason: Three Essays: Law and the Constitution

$6.99

Treason is the only crime defined in the US Constitution

The US Constitution's Framers shared the centuries-old view that citizens owed a duty of loyalty to their nation. However, they were also aware of how treason charges had been used by the English kings and British Parliament to eliminate political dissidents. Thus, while the Constitution does define treason, it does so narrowly, limiting the offence to two types of conduct: "levying war" against the United States or "adhering to [its] enemies, giving them aid and comfort". This definition can only be changed through an amendment to the Constitution.

The Framers wanted to prevent the abuse of treason charges, so they included specific protections in the Treason Clause. For example, the federal government cannot secure a treason conviction unless two witnesses testify to the same overt act, or the accused confesses in open court. This standard of proof protects against false or flimsy prosecutions. The Framers also wanted to restrict Congress's ability to define treason, make proof of the offence easy to establish, and determine its punishment.

The Constitution's definition of treason is distinct from English common law, which recognised constructive treason. The Constitution requires some sort of action before a person can be convicted of treason, departing from English law, which included traitorous thoughts and intentions in its definition. This distinction aligns with First Amendment values, protecting individuals' freedom of speech and expression.

The Framers wanted to create a restrictive concept of treason

The Framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted to create a restrictive concept of treason to prevent the abuse of treason charges by the ruling class, as they had witnessed in England. They adapted parts of the English Statute of Treason but omitted the phrase defining treason as "the 'compassing or imagining the death of our lord the King'", which had been used to develop constructive treason laws.

The Framers wanted to make it challenging to establish that someone had committed treason, so they included a specific definition of treason in the Constitution, requiring an overt act of treason, such as levying war or "adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States], giving them aid and comfort". This definition can only be changed through an amendment to the Constitution, and it restricts Congress's ability to change the proof needed to establish charges and the punishment for treason.

The Framers also included special rules of evidence, such as requiring the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court, to protect against false or flimsy prosecutions. They recognized the distinction between traitorous actions and treasonous thoughts and wanted to ensure that legitimate political opposition would not be silenced.

The Framers' restrictive concept of treason is evident in the rarity of treason prosecutions in American history, with only one person indicted for treason since 1954. The Framers' concerns about the abuse of treason charges are still relevant today, as seen in the post-9/11 era, where individuals have been charged with providing "material support" to terrorists or terrorist groups without the same safeguards as the Treason Clause.

Treason requires an act of war or intent to aid the enemy

The U.S. Constitution defines treason as levying war against the United States or aiding and providing comfort to its enemies. This act of "levying war" goes beyond formally declaring war and includes any forcible opposition to the execution of a public law. It requires an "actual assemblage of men for the purpose of executing a treasonable design", as established in the case of Ex parte Bollman & Swarthout (1807). This sets a precedent that distinguishes between conspiring to levy war and actually levying war.

The Constitution specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the nation and limits the offense to two types of conduct: "levying war" and "adhering to enemies, giving them aid and comfort". The Framers of the Constitution intended to guard against the historic use of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to silence legitimate political opposition. As such, treason requires an overt act and intent to betray, with specific requirements for conviction, such as the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court.

The requirement of an overt act is essential, as words alone typically cannot constitute treason, although they may serve as proof of treasonous intent. The act of "giving aid and comfort" to an enemy entails more than casually useful assistance. Furthermore, treason must be intentional, and individuals who unintentionally aid the enemy or are forced to do so under duress or coercion are not guilty of treason.

The Framers of the Constitution adapted parts of the English Statute of Treason but omitted references to the death of the King, which had been used to develop constructive treason laws in English common law. The Framers aimed to create a restrictive concept of treason, protecting against partisan divisions being escalated into capital charges of treason, as had occurred in England. This distinction between traitorous actions and treasonous thoughts is a crucial aspect of the Treason Clause.

Explore related products

The Treason Trial of Aaron Burr: Law, Politics, and the Character Wars of the New Nation (Cambridge Studies on the American Constitution)

$22.68 $30

Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis (Conflicting Worlds: New Dimensions of the American Civil War)

$19.95 $55

Law of Treason

$19

No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority (Complete Series)

$0.99 $5.19

Treason 2125 Or When Does Politics Become Treason

$9.99 $14.99

The Law of Treason and Treason Trials in Later Medieval France (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought: Third Series, Series Number 16)

$46.99 $50

The penalty for treason is death or a minimum of five years' imprisonment

Treason is the only crime that is defined in the US Constitution. The Constitution's framers, who shared the view that citizens owed a duty of loyalty to their nation, included the Treason Clause to guard against the misuse of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to silence legitimate political opposition. The Constitution specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the United States, limiting the offense to two types of conduct: "levying war" against the US or "adhering to [its] enemies, giving them aid and comfort".

The penalty for treason is severe: death or a minimum of five years' imprisonment, a $10,000 fine, and a bar on the defendant from holding any federal office. The federal treason statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2381, reflects the Constitution's language and imposes these minimum penalties.

The Treason Clause also protects against the expansion of the definition of treason by a corrupt executive or Congress. It requires at least two witnesses to testify to the same overt act constituting treason, or a confession in open court, to secure a conviction. This standard of proof was established to prevent false or flimsy prosecutions and protect against easily changing the requirements for a treason conviction.

The Framers adapted parts of the English Statute of Treason, enacted in 1350, but omitted the phrase defining treason as "compassing or imagining the death of our lord the King", which had been used to prosecute political dissidents. They wanted to create a restrictive concept of treason, requiring an overt act of treasonous action, rather than mere treasonous thoughts or words.

While treason charges are rare, they can apply to American citizens with dual citizenship and aliens domiciled in the US, who owe temporary allegiance to the country. The intent to betray can be proved in the same way as the intent for any other crime, and treason is similar to other crimes such as seditious conspiracy.

Treason prosecutions are extremely rare

Treason is a unique crime in the US constitutional order, as it is the only crime expressly defined by the Constitution. The Constitution's treason clause limits the definition of treason to two actions: levying war against the US and providing aid and comfort to its enemies. The Constitution's framers, who had just won their independence from Great Britain, wanted to create a "restrictive concept of the crime of treason". They included the treason clause to guard against the historic use of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to silence otherwise legitimate political opposition.

The rarity of treason prosecutions is due to the fact that treason is a serious crime that requires a high standard of proof. The Constitution specifies that no person shall be convicted of treason unless there is testimony from two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court. This safeguard helps to protect against wrongful convictions. Additionally, treason must be intentional, and the defendant must owe allegiance to the government that they are accused of betraying.

The First Amendment is also a limitation on treason prosecutions, as it allows people to express anger or a desire to overthrow the government without it being considered treasonous. However, words can serve as proof of the speaker's treasonous intent if they are likely to incite others to violence.

Frequently asked questions