Sedition Act: Constitutional Or Not?

The Sedition Act, passed in 1798, was a law that restricted the freedom of speech of American citizens by criminalizing the publication of false, scandalous, and malicious writing about the government. It was passed in anticipation of a war with France, as Federalists believed that Democratic-Republican criticism of their policies was disloyal and feared that non-citizens would sympathize with the French. The Act was highly controversial and raised questions about the limits of free speech and press freedoms, contributing to the defeat of the Federalists in the 1800 election. The Sedition Act was eventually repealed or allowed to expire in 1801. Another Sedition Act was passed in 1918 during World War I, which imposed harsh penalties on those who made false statements or criticized the government, military, or war effort. This Act was also controversial and was repealed in 1921. The impact of both Sedition Acts on free speech and press freedoms continues to shape debates about constitutional protections.

Explore related products

The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution (Witness to History)

$22 $22

The Espionage and Sedition Acts: World War I and the Image of Civil Liberties (Critical Moments in American History)

$40.27 $52.99

Discourses of Freedom of Speech: From the Enactment of the Bill of Rights to the Sedition Act of 1918

$48.51 $54.99

The Colonial Constitution

$17.19 $35.95

The Invention of Pornography, 1500-1800: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity

$26.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$239.4 $359

The Sedition Act of 1798

The Act was passed by a vote of 44 to 41 in the 5th Congress (1797-1799), which was narrowly divided between the majority Federalists and minority Jeffersonian Republicans. Federalists championed the legislation, fearing an impending war with France and desiring to retain power in Congress and the White House, then occupied by Federalist John Adams.

The Sedition Act authorized the punishment of any person authoring or printing "false, scandalous and malicious writing" against the Congress or the president, which was intended to "defame... or to bring them... into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them... the hatred of the good people of the United States." The Act also allowed for the admission of "the truth of the matter contained in the publication" as evidence in defence and gave the jury "the right to determine the law and the fact."

The Act was used to arrest newspaper editors who were critical of President Adams and his policies, particularly regarding his "war" with France. The Act's supporters argued that it protected the nation's foundations, while opponents deemed it unconstitutional and indefensible. The Act's passage contributed to the defeat of the Federalists in the 1800 election, after which the Act was allowed to expire on March 3, 1801. The controversies surrounding the Act shaped subsequent debates about constitutional protections of free speech.

The Sedition Act of 1918

The Act resulted in a small number of prosecutions due to its late enactment in the war, with Armistice Day just a few months away. One notable case was that of Mollie Steimer, who was convicted under the Espionage Act as amended by the Sedition Act. The enforcement of the Sedition Act varied across jurisdictions, with most activity occurring in Western states where the Industrial Workers of the World labor union was prominent.

The Alien and Sedition Acts

The four acts were: the Naturalization Act, the Alien Friends Act, the Alien Enemies Act, and the Sedition Act. The Naturalization Act increased the residency requirement for American citizenship from five to 14 years. The Alien Friends Act authorized the president to deport any foreigner deemed dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States. The Alien Enemies Act allowed the president to authorize the arrest, relocation, or deportation of any male over the age of 14 from a foreign enemy country. The Sedition Act permitted the deportation, fine, or imprisonment of anyone deemed a threat or publishing "false, scandalous, or malicious writing" against the government of the United States.

The controversies surrounding the Alien and Sedition Acts provided for some of the first tests of the limits of freedom of speech and press. Arguments made for and against the Acts shaped subsequent debate about constitutional protections of free speech.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$305

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

Constitutionality

The constitutionality of the Sedition Act has been a matter of debate. The Act was passed in 1798 and allowed for the deportation, fining, or imprisonment of anyone deemed a threat or publishing "false, scandalous, or malicious writing" against the US government. It was endorsed by the Federalist Party of President John Adams as a response to a developing dispute with the French Republic and related fears of domestic political subversion. However, it was unpopular with the public and opposed by the Democratic-Republicans, who argued that it violated the First Amendment protecting free speech and press.

Federalists argued that the Sedition Act was constitutional under the necessary and proper clause and that it expanded civil liberties by allowing for the truth of the matter contained in the publication to be used as evidence in defense and giving the jury the right to determine the law and the fact. They believed that it was impossible to attack members of the government without attacking the foundation of the government itself.

On the other hand, James Madison of Virginia, in his Virginia Resolutions and a report for the Virginia Assembly, stressed the necessity of completely free and vigorous political debate for republican governments. He argued that common law had evolved to meet the needs of hereditary systems, not elective systems that require the continuous critical examination of public officials and policies. Madison's argument called into question the constitutionality of a national seditious libel law and the need for such a law in an elective system.

The Sedition Act was one of the first tests of freedom of speech, and the debates surrounding it shaped subsequent discussions about constitutional protections of free speech. While it proved unpopular, with President Adams losing his re-election, and expired in 1801, it did have some lasting impact on the interpretation of the Constitution.

Another Sedition Act was passed in 1918 as an amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917. This Act extended the Espionage Act to cover a broader range of offenses, including speech and the expression of opinions that cast the government or the war effort in a negative light. It is unclear whether this Act was ever explicitly challenged on constitutional grounds, but there were concerns about the constitutionality of proposals to withdraw prosecutorial authority from the Justice Department and place it in the War Department.

Free speech and press

The Sedition Act of 1798 was one of the first tests of freedom of speech and press in the United States. The Act permitted the deportation, fining, or imprisonment of anyone deemed a threat or publishing "false, scandalous, or malicious writing" against the government. This included writing or printing something that intended to defame the government or bring them into contempt or disrepute.

The Act was passed in preparation for an anticipated war with France, and it tightened restrictions on foreign-born Americans. The Federalists, who controlled Congress at the time, believed that Democratic-Republican criticism of Federalist policies was disloyal and feared that non-citizens living in the United States would sympathize with the French during the war.

The Sedition Act was highly controversial and unpopular with the public. Republicans defended the First Amendment, which protects free speech and press. James Madison, a Democratic-Republican, argued that the common law had evolved to meet the needs of hereditary systems, not elective systems that require the continuous critical examination of public officials and policies. He stressed the necessity of completely free and vigorous political debate for republican governments. Madison's argument called into question the constitutionality of a national seditious libel law and the need for such a law at any level of government in an elective system.

The Sedition Act trials contributed to the defeat of the Federalists in the 1800 election, after which the Act was allowed to expire. The controversies surrounding the Act provided for some of the first tests of the limits of freedom of speech and press, and the arguments made for and against it shaped subsequent debates about constitutional protections of free speech.

Frequently asked questions