Another Route To Amend The Constitution

The United States Constitution outlines two methods for amending the nation's frame of government. The second method, also known as the convention option, requires Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments at the request of two-thirds of state legislatures. This method has yet to be invoked, with all amendments to date being proposed by Congress and ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures. The convention option provides an alternative route for state legislatures to propose amendments and ensure their direct representation in the process.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$104.74 $150

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

Requires Congress to call a convention

Article V of the United States Constitution provides two methods for amending the nation's frame of government. The second method, which has never been invoked, requires Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments at the request of two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states out of 50). This process is also known as a constitutional convention and has yet to be used for any of the 27 amendments to the Constitution.

The convention option is a powerful political tool that enables state legislatures to "erect barriers against the encroachments of the national authority." It highlights the importance of widespread agreement in constitutional amendments and ensures that any changes to the Constitution have broad support across the country. This rigorous process also empowers states to have a direct say in the foundational legal document that governs them and encourages thoughtful and deliberate consideration of amendments by a substantial majority.

The second method of amending the Constitution through a convention has supporters, including retired federal judge Malcolm R. Wilkey. Judge Wilkey has argued that a new constitutional convention is necessary to address the corruption of the current system, including gridlock, the influence of interest groups, and the excessive focus of members of Congress on reelection. However, despite its potential benefits, the convention option has not been utilised in the amendment process thus far.

The first method of amending the Constitution, which has been used for all 33 amendments submitted to the states for ratification, involves Congress proposing an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This process highlights the role of the national legislature in the amendment process, while the second method, requiring Congress to call a convention, emphasises the role of state legislatures or state conventions in proposing and ratifying amendments.

In conclusion, the second method of amending the Constitution, which requires Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments at the request of two-thirds of state legislatures, has not been utilised in the amendment process thus far. It represents a powerful tool for states to shape the nation's governing document and ensure that any changes have broad support and reflect a consensus across the country. Despite its potential benefits, the first method, involving a two-thirds majority vote in Congress, has been the exclusive means of proposing amendments thus far.

Two-thirds of state legislatures must apply

The United States Constitution was crafted "to endure for ages to come", as Chief Justice John Marshall observed in the early 1800s. Amending the Constitution is therefore a challenging and lengthy process, as evidenced by the fact that it has only been amended 27 times since its drafting in 1787.

Article V of the Constitution outlines two methods for proposing amendments. The second method, which has never been used, involves two-thirds of state legislatures applying to Congress to call a constitutional convention for proposing amendments. This method empowers states to have a direct say in the process, reflecting the will of their constituents.

The second method, also known as the convention option, is a political tool that can be used to "erect barriers against the encroachments of national authority". It serves as a check on national authority and ensures that any changes to the Constitution have broad support and are not made lightly.

To initiate the process, two-thirds of state legislatures must submit an application to Congress. This step has yet to be successfully completed, despite efforts by some, such as retired federal judge Malcolm R. Wilkey, who advocated for a new constitutional convention. Once Congress receives the applications from the required number of states, it is then responsible for calling the convention.

While the second method has not been utilized, it remains a crucial part of the constitutional framework, providing an alternative pathway for proposing amendments and ensuring that the amendment process is not solely controlled by Congress.

Ratification by three-fourths of states

The second method of amending the US Constitution is "ratification by three-fourths of states". This method requires the approval of three-fourths of the state legislatures, or conventions in three-fourths of the states, to ratify an amendment. This method has only been used once, for the ratification of the 21st Amendment, which repealed Prohibition.

The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately difficult and time-consuming. A proposed amendment must pass through Congress with a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Once an amendment is proposed, it is sent to the states for ratification. The Congress decides whether it will be ratified by state legislatures or state conventions.

State ratification is a critical phase in the constitutional amendment process. It ensures that any changes to the Constitution have broad support and reflects a wide consensus. It also embodies the federal nature of the US government and the diverse opinions across the nation.

Once an amendment is ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50), it is sent to the Secretary of State, who certifies it as a valid part of the Constitution. This certification is then published in the Federal Register and US Statutes at Large, serving as official notice that the amendment process is complete.

Explore related products

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$16.17 $26.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.55 $180

The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought

$95

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

State legislatures have direct say

The United States Constitution outlines two methods for proposing amendments. The second method, which has never been used, involves two-thirds of state legislatures calling on Congress to propose a constitutional convention for amendments. This process highlights the importance of state involvement in the amendment process, ensuring that any changes to the Constitution reflect a broad consensus and have widespread support across the country.

State legislatures play a crucial role in the second method of amending the Constitution. When two-thirds of the state legislatures apply to Congress, they can request that a convention be called to propose amendments. This step empowers states to have a direct say in the constitutional amendment process, allowing them to actively shape the nation's governing document. By requiring the involvement of multiple states, this method promotes deliberation and thoughtful consideration of any proposed changes.

The convention option, as the second method is often called, serves as a political tool to protect state interests. It enables state legislatures to erect barriers against potential encroachments by the national government. This safeguard ensures that the federal nature of the US government is maintained and that diverse opinions across the nation are represented in the amendment process.

The second method of amending the Constitution has yet to be invoked. All amendments submitted to the states for ratification have originated from Congress through the first method. However, the convention option remains a viable path for proposing amendments and empowering states to have a direct role in shaping the Constitution.

The state ratification process is a critical phase in the second method of amending the Constitution. After amendments are proposed at the convention, they must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states. This step ensures that any amendments reflect the will of the people in multiple states and have broad support. The ratification process embodies the federal nature of the US government and highlights the enduring impact of constitutional changes.

A tool to prevent federal overreach

Article V of the United States Constitution outlines two methods for amending the nation's government. The second method, also known as the convention option, is a powerful tool that can be used to prevent federal overreach and protect states' rights.

This method requires Congress, upon the request of two-thirds of state legislatures, to call a convention for proposing amendments. It has yet to be invoked but serves as a safeguard against federal overreach by empowering state legislatures to play a direct role in the constitutional amendment process.

The convention option ensures that states have a strong voice in shaping the nation's governing document, reflecting their diverse opinions and interests. By requiring the support of two-thirds of state legislatures, this process guarantees that any proposed amendments have broad support and consensus across the country. This barrier to amending the constitution ensures that any changes are thoughtful and deliberate, protecting the enduring nature of the document.

The second method also reinforces federalism by balancing the power between the state and national governments. It allows states to act as a check on federal power, ensuring that the national government cannot unilaterally amend the Constitution in a way that encroaches on states' rights or undermines their representation.

Additionally, the convention option provides a mechanism for states to propose amendments that protect their interests and rights. This process empowers states to proactively shape the Constitution, ensuring their concerns are addressed and their sovereignty is maintained.

In summary, the second method of amending the Constitution, as outlined in Article V, serves as a critical tool to prevent federal overreach. By giving state legislatures a direct role in proposing amendments, it safeguards states' rights, promotes broad consensus, and reinforces the federalist nature of the United States government.

Frequently asked questions