The Constitution's Approval: A Process Of Ratification

The process of approving the Constitution is a complex and challenging endeavour, deliberately designed to ensure that any changes to this foundational document reflect a broad consensus across the nation. The U.S. Constitution's amendment process, outlined in Article V, requires a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Congress or a convention requested by two-thirds of state legislatures to propose an amendment. Subsequently, three-quarters of state legislatures or conventions must ratify the proposed amendment, making the process lengthy and intricate. This rigorous amendment process underscores the importance of stability and careful consideration in modifying the nation's fundamental laws.

Explore related products

New Drugs: An Insider's Guide to the FDA's New Drug Approval Process for Scientists, Investors and Patients

$18.4 $24.95

Land Use and the Constitution: Principles for Planning Practice (AICP Handbook)

$82.99 $190

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 12: Ratification of the Constitution by the States, Maryland, No. 1 (Volume 12)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 1: Constitutional Documents and Records 1776-1787 (Volume 1)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 41: Bill of Rights, No. 5 (Volume 41)

$95

Amendments must be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate

The process of approving the Constitution of the United States is a challenging and deliberate process that prioritises stability and thorough consideration. Amendments to the Constitution must be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate. This is a critical step in the amendment process, ensuring that any changes to the nation's foundational document reflect a substantial consensus across Congress.

The two-thirds majority requirement in both chambers of Congress underscores the importance of achieving broad agreement on proposed amendments. This supermajority threshold is intentionally high, making it difficult for a single party or narrow ideological faction to drive changes to the Constitution unilaterally. It encourages bipartisan cooperation and the pursuit of amendments that can garner support across political divides.

The two-thirds majority vote in Congress is one of two methods for proposing amendments, as outlined in Article V of the Constitution. The alternative method involves a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. However, it is noteworthy that none of the 27 amendments to the Constitution thus far have been proposed through a constitutional convention.

Once an amendment is proposed by Congress with the requisite two-thirds majority, it enters the ratification process. This process involves the states, with the proposed amendment being submitted to the state legislatures or state ratifying conventions, depending on the specified method. The ratification stage further emphasises the importance of consensus, requiring approval by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) for an amendment to become part of the Constitution.

The rigorous process of securing a two-thirds majority in Congress for proposing amendments, followed by the ratification process requiring substantial state approval, underscores the framers' intent to ensure that changes to the Constitution are infrequent and widely supported. This deliberate complexity in the amendment process reflects a preference for stability and a cautious approach to modifying the nation's foundational framework.

Amendments can also be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures

The process of approving the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. Amendments to the Constitution can be proposed in two ways. One way is for Congress to propose an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The other way is through a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

The second method, a constitutional convention, has never been used to propose an amendment. The first method, a two-thirds majority vote in Congress, has been used 33 times to propose amendments, 27 of which have been ratified by three-fourths of the states.

When Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process. The Archivist has delegated many of the duties associated with this function to the Director of the Federal Register. The amendment is then forwarded directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format.

The OFR also assembles an information package for the states, which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution, copies of the joint resolution in slip law format, and other relevant documents. Once a state ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the state action, which is immediately conveyed to the Director of the Federal Register.

The OFR examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are in good order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them. The OFR retains these documents until an amendment is adopted or fails, at which point the records are transferred to the National Archives for preservation.

A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). Once the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process has been completed.

Amendments must be ratified by three-quarters of the states

The process of approving the Constitution of the United States is best described as difficult. This complexity arises from the rigorous requirements set by the framers to ensure that any changes to the foundational document would reflect a broad consensus across the nation. The framers of the Constitution established a challenging amendment process outlined in Article V, which requires substantial consensus in both proposal and ratification stages.

To amend the Constitution, an amendment must be proposed either by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress or by a convention requested by two-thirds of state legislatures. Once proposed, it must then be ratified by three-quarters (38 out of 50) of the states. This means that a challenging majority of states must agree, making it a lengthy and complex procedure.

The ratification method is chosen by Congress for each amendment. State ratifying conventions were used only once, for the Twenty-first Amendment. When a State ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the State action, which is immediately conveyed to the Director of the Federal Register. The OFR examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are found to be in good order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them.

The OFR retains these documents until an amendment is adopted or fails, and then transfers the records to the National Archives for preservation. A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States. When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to the Congress and to the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.

Explore related products

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 40: Bill of Rights, No. 4, 1 January-31 August 1789 (Volume 40)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 38: Bill of Rights, No. 2, The Public Debate, September 1787-May 1788 (Volume 38)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 37: The Bill of Rights, No. 1 (Volume 37)

$95

The Writing and Ratification of the U.S. Constitution: Practical Virtue in Action

$52.43 $59

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 8: Ratification of the Constitution by the States: Virginia, No. 1 (Volume 8)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 39: Bill of Rights, No. 3, The Public Debate, 4 June-31 December 1788 (Volume 39)

$95

Ratification can be done via state legislatures or state ratifying conventions

The process of approving the Constitution is a challenging and rigorous procedure. It requires significant consensus from both Congress and the states, with amendments needing to be proposed and then ratified by a two-thirds majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. This can also be achieved through a national convention, which occurs when two-thirds of state legislatures call for one.

The ratification process can be administered through state legislatures or state ratifying conventions, with the method chosen by Congress for each amendment. State legislatures or governors submit the amendment to their state legislatures or call for a convention, depending on Congress's specifications. This step has been expedited in the past, with some state legislatures taking action before receiving official notice. Once a state ratifies, it sends an original or certified copy of the state action to the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

State ratifying conventions were only used once, for the Twenty-first Amendment. These conventions are formed by delegates elected by their neighbours to represent their interests. The delegates are asked to place limits on the power of their state legislators, and their approval indicates that the new government rules with the consent of the people.

The ratification process is lengthy and complex, requiring a challenging majority of states to agree. A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution when ratified by three-quarters of the states (38 out of 50). The OFR drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large, serving as official notice of the amendment's completion.

The Archivist of the United States administers the ratification process

The process of approving the Constitution of the United States is called the "Constitutional Amendment Process". The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process. This responsibility is derived from Article V of the Constitution and the provisions of 1 U.S.C. 106b.

The Archivist's role in the ratification process involves receiving an original or certified copy of state action when a state ratifies a proposed amendment. This copy is then conveyed to the Director of the Federal Register, who examines the ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are in order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody until an amendment is adopted or fails. At this point, the records are transferred to the National Archives for preservation.

Once the required number of authenticated ratification documents is verified by the Office of the Federal Register (OFR), a formal proclamation is drafted for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large, serving as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process is complete. The Archivist's certification of the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents is considered final and conclusive.

It is important to note that the Archivist does not make substantive determinations regarding the validity of state ratification actions. Additionally, the Archivist has delegated many ministerial duties associated with the ratification process to the Director of the Federal Register, including the custody of Electoral College documents in presidential elections.

The ratification process for amendments to the Constitution requires the approval of three-fourths of the states, either through their legislatures or state ratifying conventions. This high bar ensures a wide consensus for any changes to the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions