Limitations On Government Power: The Constitution's Only Limit

The only limitation in the U.S. Constitution regarding what can be the basis of an amendment is found in Article V, which outlines the process by which amendments can be proposed and ratified. This article includes two stated limits on the amending process: the first concerns the protection of each state's right to have equal suffrage in the Senate, and the second refers to restrictions on the slave trade.

Explore related products

A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union

$38.04 $49.95

Drive Thru History® - "America: Columbus to the Constitution" (Special Edition)

$19.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitution of the United States (Books of American Wisdom)

$9.25 $9.95

How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution

$5.38 $9

The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government

$24.63 $29

No amendment can deprive a state of its equal representation in the Senate

The United States Constitution is a document that outlines the powers and limitations of the federal government. It is subject to amendments, which are changes made to the Constitution, and the process of proposing and ratifying these amendments is outlined in Article V of the Constitution.

The only limitation in the Constitution regarding what can be the basis of an amendment is that no amendment can deprive a state of its equal representation in the Senate without its consent. This means that each state, regardless of population, is guaranteed two senators and that the fundamental structure of the Senate cannot be altered.

This limitation was included to protect the interests of smaller states and ensure they maintain a voice in federal legislation and the legislative branch of government. It reflects the compromises made during the Constitutional Convention regarding representation between large and small states. The framers understood that equal representation in the Senate was necessary to prevent larger states from overpowering smaller ones in legislative matters.

An example of this limitation in action is that even if a majority of states wanted to give more representation to larger states, they could not do so without the consent of all states, thus ensuring that smaller states retain their influence. This limitation applies to any amendment aiming to change the number of senators each state has, as it would be unconstitutional to deprive a state of its equal suffrage in the Senate without its consent.

No amendment can alter the slave trade clause

The United States Constitution has a limitation regarding what can be the basis of an amendment, which is found in Article V. This article establishes the process by which amendments can be proposed and ratified.

The only limitation in the Constitution as to what can be the basis of an amendment is that it shall not affect the 1st and 4th clauses in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. This mainly referred to restrictions on the slave trade. No amendment could be made before 1808 that would affect these clauses, which allowed Congress to pass legislation outlawing the "Importation of Persons".

The Slave Trade Clause is a fascinating exception to constitutional change, with a built-in expiration date after which the federal government's powers would no longer be restricted. The Clause itself does not grant Congress the power to restrict the slave trade, but Congress presumably used the foreign and interstate commerce powers given in Article 1, Section 8, to do so.

The Slave Trade Clause, although constitutionally inoperative for over 200 years, remains in the Constitution. It has a continuing cultural and political constitutional relevance in the discourse of the morality and profitability of the international trade in human beings.

The Thirteenth Amendment, passed in 1865, abolished slavery and was swiftly ratified by nearly all Northern states, along with a sufficient number of border states. It was an amendment to ensure that abolition was beyond legal challenge. The Fourteenth Amendment, passed in 1868, extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.

No amendment can affect the first and fourth clauses of Article I, Section 9

The only limitation in the US Constitution regarding what can be the basis of an amendment is found in Article V, which outlines the process by which amendments can be proposed and ratified. This article includes two stated limits on the amending process.

The first of these is that no amendment can affect the first and fourth clauses of Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. The first clause, in force until 1808, prohibited Congress from banning the importation of slaves. The fourth clause prohibits states from imposing direct taxes, although this was changed by Amendment XVI, which gives Congress the power to impose a federal income tax.

The second limitation is that no state can be deprived of its equal representation in the Senate without its consent. This means that any amendment to the Constitution cannot alter the fundamental structure of the Senate, which gives two senators to each state, regardless of population.

In summary, while the Constitution allows for many amendments, it explicitly restricts changes that affect the slave trade (historically) and the equal representation of states in the Senate.

Explore related products

Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States Before the Adoption of the Constitution

$150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $1.99

The Constitution of the United States & The Declaration of Independence: Pocket Size

$6.99

All About History Constitution of the United States: How An 18th-Century Charter Became The Cornerstone Of American Democracy

$21.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: With the Articles of Federation, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, and all the Amendments - Edited by Dvir Zagury Grynbaum

$3.89 $3.89

The Constitution of Canada

$15.94 $4.99

Amendments must be proposed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress

The US Constitution outlines a two-step process for proposing amendments: the proposal stage and the ratification stage. This answer will focus on the proposal stage and the requirement for a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress.

The proposal stage is the first step in the amendment process, and it involves initiating the idea of an amendment. To propose an amendment, the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the two chambers of Congress. This means that out of the 435 members of the House of Representatives, at least 290 members must vote in favour of the proposed amendment. In the Senate, at least 67 out of the 100 senators must also vote in favour. Achieving this supermajority in both chambers is a significant hurdle, ensuring that any proposed amendment has broad support across the nation, as members of Congress are elected by the people and represent their interests.

The requirement for a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress serves as a critical check in the amendment process. It ensures that any changes made to the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, are carefully considered and widely accepted. This supermajority requirement helps to prevent hasty or impulsive amendments and protects the stability and integrity of the Constitution.

While the two-thirds majority vote in Congress is one way to propose an amendment, there is an alternative method outlined in Article V of the Constitution. If two-thirds of the state legislatures, or state-level legislative assemblies, request a national convention, an amendment can also be proposed through this convention process. This provides a pathway for amendments to be initiated even if they do not gain sufficient support in Congress, demonstrating the flexibility built into the amendment process.

The proposal stage, with its two-thirds majority requirement, is just the first step in amending the Constitution. Once an amendment is proposed, it must then go through the ratification stage, where it is officially adopted and becomes part of the Constitution. This two-step process further emphasises the careful consideration and broad consensus required to modify the nation's founding document.

Amendments must be ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures

The only limitation in the US Constitution regarding what can be the basis of an amendment is found in Article V, which outlines the process by which amendments can be proposed and ratified. This article contains two stated limits on the amending process. Firstly, it originally prevented any amendments that would affect the first and fourth clauses of the Ninth Section of the First Article until the year 1808. This mainly referred to restrictions on the slave trade.

The second limitation, which is still in place, states that no state can be deprived of its equal representation in the Senate without its consent. This means that any amendment to the Constitution cannot alter the fundamental structure of the Senate, which gives two senators to each state, regardless of population. This restriction was included to protect the interests of smaller states by ensuring they maintain a voice in federal legislation.

To propose an amendment, a two-thirds majority is required in both houses of Congress, or a national convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures. Once proposed, the amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states before it becomes part of the Constitution.

This limitation reflects the compromises made during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where issues of representation between large and small states were hotly debated. The framers understood that representation in the Senate would need to remain equal to prevent larger states from overpowering smaller ones in legislative matters.

Frequently asked questions