Insurrection Act: When Can The Us President Use It?

The Insurrection Act, originally enacted in 1792, is a compilation of statutes that grants the president the authority to deploy the U.S. military and use it for civilian law enforcement within the United States in certain circumstances. The act has been invoked many times throughout American history, including during labour conflicts, civil rights movements, and in response to protests and civil unrest. While it provides the president with significant power to maintain order, there are concerns about its vague language, lack of constraints, and potential for abuse.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Authoritarian Playbook and the Insurrection Act

$10.5

Insurrection Act Restored: States Likely to Maintain Authority Over National Guard in Domestic Emergencies

$15.95

The Insurrection Act and America’s Balance of Power: What to Know About the Federal Authority, State Sovereignty, and the Rule of Law

$8.99

'The Insurrection ACT Rider' and State Control of the National Guard

$17.75

Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions

$17.89

The Insurrection Act of 1807

The Act is among the most powerful emergency powers available to the president. It allows the president to deploy the US armed forces, militia, and National Guard to suppress insurrections, civil unrest, or domestic violence, and to enforce the law when it is being obstructed. There are few constraints on this presidential power, and neither Congress nor the courts play a role in deciding what constitutes an obstruction or rebellion. The law also does not limit the actions military forces may take once deployed.

The Insurrection Act has been criticised as being dangerously vague and in urgent need of reform. There are concerns that the law is ripe for abuse and can be used to undermine democratic institutions and individual rights. In 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced the CIVIL Act (Curtailing Insurrection and Violations of Individuals' Liberties Act) to restrict presidential authorities outlined in the Insurrection Act. The proposal sought to require the president to consult with Congress before invoking the Act and to restrict the deployment of active-duty troops without explicit congressional authorisation.

The Insurrection Act has been invoked in recent years, including by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, who activated 2,000 reserve soldiers in response to protests and riots in Los Angeles. In 2020, President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Act in response to the George Floyd protests, but ultimately did not do so. Trump's deployment of the National Guard to California in 2025 to respond to protests against ICE immigration raids has also been criticised as stretching the law and threatening authoritarianism.

Deploying US troops to quell domestic unrest

The Insurrection Act, originally enacted in 1792, grants the president the authority to deploy US military forces domestically and use them for civilian law enforcement. The Act has been invoked many times throughout American history, including during labour conflicts in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and to enforce federally mandated desegregation.

The Act allows the president to deploy the military in a state to suppress "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" that hinders the execution of laws or impedes the course of justice. It is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits the use of military forces for domestic law enforcement.

There are concerns that the Insurrection Act is dangerously vague and ripe for abuse. In 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced the CIVIL Act to restrict presidential authority under the Insurrection Act and require consultation with Congress before invoking it.

In recent years, there have been instances where presidents have considered or threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to quell domestic unrest. For example, in 2020, President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Act in response to the George Floyd protests. In 2025, President Trump deployed Marines and National Guard troops to Los Angeles to respond to protests against ICE immigration raids, but he did not formally invoke the Insurrection Act. Instead, he relied on inherent constitutional powers and emergency statutory authority.

The deployment of troops by President Trump in Los Angeles was controversial, with California Governor Gavin Newsom accusing the administration of illegally militarizing the city and suing to reverse the National Guard order. Experts on domestic federal military involvement stated that Trump's actions stretched the law, as the conditions for invoking the Insurrection Act were not clearly met.

The Posse Comitatus Act

The title of the Act comes from the legal concept of posse comitatus, which refers to the authority of a county sheriff or other law officer to conscript any able-bodied person to assist in keeping the peace. In British and American law, a posse comitatus is a group of people mobilized by the sheriff to suppress lawlessness in the county. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of soldiers instead of civilians as a posse comitatus.

Explore related products

The Kols; the insurrection of 1832; and the Land Tenure Act of 1869. [A review.]

$14.99

The Revolutionary Act Military Insurrection Or Political and Economic Action? 1922 [Leather Bound]

$25.95

Insurrection: The American Revolution and Its Meaning

$30

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99

Pocket U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence by Cato Institute

$6.94

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$19.99

The role of the President

The Insurrection Act, originally enacted in 1792, grants the President of the United States the authority to deploy the U.S. military and use it against Americans on domestic soil under certain conditions. This is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally bars federal military forces from engaging in civilian law enforcement activities.

The Act allows the President to deploy the military to suppress "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" that hinders the execution of laws or impedes the course of justice. It also permits the President to use the military to enforce federal authority when state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect constitutional rights.

The President's power under the Insurrection Act is considered dangerously broad and ripe for abuse, with few constraints on its use. While courts generally cannot review a President's decision to deploy troops, the Supreme Court has indicated that it may step in if the President acts in bad faith, exceeds honest judgment, makes an obvious mistake, or acts without legal authorisation.

There have been calls for reform to the Insurrection Act to introduce checks and balances, such as requiring the President to consult with Congress before invoking the Act and limiting the duration of troop deployment without congressional authorisation.

Calls for reform

The Insurrection Act, originally enacted in 1792, has faced growing calls for reform due to concerns over its vague language, lack of clear limitations, and potential for abuse. Critics argue that the law grants the president significant power to deploy the military domestically and use it against American citizens, which is inherently dangerous to liberty and democratic values.

In 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced the CIVIL Act (Curtailing Insurrection and Violations of Individuals' Liberties Act) to restrict presidential authorities outlined in the Insurrection Act. The legislation aimed to require the President to consult with Congress before invoking the Act and sought to restrict the activation of troops under the Act to fourteen days without explicit congressional authorization. It also aimed to prohibit active-duty troops from performing law enforcement actions unless authorized by law.

The Brennan Center for Justice has also proposed comprehensive reforms to narrow the criteria for deployment, specify authorized actions, and give Congress and the courts approval and review authority to prevent abuse or overreach. They argue that the Act fails to adequately define key terms such as "insurrection," "rebellion," and "domestic violence," leaving too much discretion to the President.

The Insurrection Act has been invoked numerous times throughout history, including during labor conflicts and to enforce desegregation. However, critics argue that it should be a tool of last resort and that its vague language and lack of constraints make it ripe for abuse. In 2022, the Brennan Center submitted a proposal to the January 6 house committee investigating the Capitol attack to reform the Act and clarify its contents.

Frequently asked questions