Understanding Australia's Constitution: Section 44 Explained

Section 44 of the Australian Constitution outlines the grounds for disqualification regarding who may become a candidate for election to the Parliament of Australia. It has been reviewed several times, but never amended. The section has proven difficult to interpret and apply, and its replacement or revision has been frequently considered. Section 44(i) states that any individual who is a citizen of a foreign power or entitled to the rights of a citizen of a foreign power is disqualified from sitting in Parliament. This has been a controversial issue, with some cases being brought before the High Court, such as Alley v Gillespie [2018], which involved the interpretation of Section 44(v) and Section 46 of the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Australian Constitution as it is Actually Written

$16.95

Browning 4L450 FHP V-Belts, L Belt Section, 44 Pitch

$22.3

Church Dogmatics, Vol. 3.2, Sections 43-44: The Doctrine of Creation, Study Edition 14

$47.95

Chief Rotary Flow Dividers 0.265 CID Per Section, .86-3.44 GPM Flow Range Per Section, 2 Section

$302.93

Section 44 [Édition Spéciale]

$17.36

Shiver

$24.99

Disqualification criteria for Australian parliamentary candidates

Section 44 of the Australian Constitution outlines the disqualification criteria for parliamentary candidates. It details the grounds for disqualification for those seeking election to the Parliament of Australia. While it has been reviewed several times, the section has never been amended. Almost every part of Section 44 has proven challenging to interpret and apply, and proposals for revision or replacement have not been pursued.

Subsection 44(i) specifies disqualification for those who are under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power or are citizens or entitled to the rights of citizens of a foreign power. This includes dual citizens, which is an unusual provision compared to other Anglosphere nations. The third arm of this subsection, regarding entitlements to the rights of foreign citizens, has never been the subject of a judicial decision.

Subsection 44(ii) concerns treason and conviction for offences punishable under Commonwealth or state law. Subsection 44(iv) relates to holding an "office of profit under the Crown", which has been a subject of interpretation in the case of Jeannie Ferris, who resigned from the Senate and was immediately reappointed to the same position.

Subsection 44(v) addresses having a pecuniary interest in agreements with the public service of the Commonwealth or a state. This subsection was relevant in the cases of Senator Bob Day and Liberal National Party Senator Barry O'Sullivan, leading to the former's disqualification from holding public office.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) does not administer the Constitution, and it cannot provide advice or disqualify candidates based on Section 44. However, the AEC's Candidates Handbook highlights the importance of accurate information on nomination forms, stating that providing false or misleading information is a criminal offence.

Dual citizenship and allegiance to foreign powers

Section 44 of the Australian Constitution outlines the grounds for disqualification regarding who may become a candidate for election to the Parliament of Australia. This section has been reviewed several times, but it has never been amended.

Subsection 44(i) states that any person who is "under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power" is disqualified from being chosen or sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. In other words, Australian politicians are prohibited from holding dual citizenship.

This provision is unusual when compared to other Anglosphere nations. For example, neither the British Parliament nor the US Congress, which served as models for the Australian Parliament, forbids dual citizens from holding office. Canada and New Zealand also have no prohibitions on MPs holding dual citizenship. Despite some opposition to changing this subsection, an opinion poll from late 2017 found overall opposition to be within the margin of error (49% to 47%), with 5% undecided. A Newspoll from May 2018, however, found that 51% backed Section 44's ban on dual citizenship, against 38% who didn't.

The interpretation and application of Section 44 have proven challenging. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) does not administer the Constitution, and it is the responsibility of the Attorney-General's Department. The AEC advises candidates to be aware that providing "false or misleading information" or "omitting information that would be misleading" on nomination forms is a criminal offence punishable by up to 12 months' imprisonment. However, it does not explicitly state that such a conviction could lead to disqualification under Section 44.

The third arm of 44(i), regarding individuals "entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power", has never been the subject of a judicial decision. The Court has clarified that the status of citizenship or subjecthood of a foreign power is determined by the law of that foreign power. As such, candidates must thoroughly examine their ancestry and seek legal advice to ensure they are not citizens of a foreign power.

Section 44(i) has been invoked in several high-profile cases. In 2017, it was reported that Liberal National Party Senator Barry O'Sullivan might be in breach of this subsection due to his financial interests. In the same year, the High Court ruled that Senator Bob Day had been ineligible to hold public office because of an indirect pecuniary relationship with the Australian government. This ruling also led to scrutiny of Nationals member David Gillespie, who owned commercial property leased to Australia Post.

Pecuniary interests and disqualification

Section 44 of the Australian Constitution outlines the grounds for disqualification regarding who may run for election to the Parliament of Australia. It has been reviewed several times but has never been amended. The section has proven difficult to interpret and apply, and its replacement or revision has been frequently considered.

In August 2017, Liberal National Party Senator Barry O'Sullivan was accused of potentially breaching Section 44(v) as a shareholder in a family construction company that was subcontracted for work on a federally funded road project in Queensland. O'Sullivan denied the accusation. Nationals member of the House of Representatives, David Gillespie, also came under scrutiny for potentially having an indirect financial relationship with the federal government, as he owned a suburban shopping complex in Port Macquarie.

Section 44(i) of the Australian Constitution, which addresses dual citizenship and allegiance to foreign powers, has also been a subject of controversy. While some Anglosphere nations, such as Canada and New Zealand, allow MPs to hold dual citizenship, Section 44(i) of the Australian Constitution forbids it. This led to several high-profile politicians being forced to resign during the 2017-18 Australian parliamentary eligibility crisis. Despite this, opinion polls from late 2017 to early 2018 showed overall opposition to changing Section 44(i), with a slight majority in favour of maintaining the ban on dual-citizenship holders.

Explore related products

School of Technique Parts 3 and 4: Sevcik Viola Studies

$9.95

Section 60: Arlington National Cemetery

$3.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99

Pocket U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence by Cato Institute

$6.94

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$31.99 $39.99

False or misleading information on nomination forms

Section 44 of the Australian Constitution outlines the grounds for disqualification regarding who may become a candidate for election to the Parliament of Australia. It has been reviewed several times, but it has never been amended.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) includes Section 44 in its Candidates Handbook, where it specifically highlights the implications of providing false or misleading information on nomination forms. The AEC warns that it is a criminal offence to provide false or misleading information or to omit information that, if withheld, would be misleading. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for up to 12 months.

While the AEC does not explicitly state it, such a conviction could result in disqualification under Section 44(ii). This subsection states that individuals who have been convicted and are under sentence or subject to sentencing for any offence punishable under Commonwealth or state law are disqualified.

The provision of false or misleading information on nomination forms has been a challenging aspect of Section 44 to interpret and enforce. The complexity of this issue has sparked frequent discussions about replacing or revising the section. However, these proposals have not been pursued.

It is worth noting that Section 44(i) has also received significant attention. This subsection relates to individuals who hold dual citizenship or allegiance to a foreign power. While other Anglosphere nations, such as the British Parliament and the US Congress, do not have similar prohibitions, Section 44(i) of the Australian Constitution has been a subject of debate and has resulted in the disqualification of several high-profile politicians.

Administration of the Constitution and the AEC's role

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) does not administer the Constitution. The AEC is not authorised to provide advice or disqualify any candidates due to the operation of Section 44 of the Constitution. The administration of the Constitution is the responsibility of the Attorney-General's Department.

The AEC publishes Electoral Backgrounders to provide a basic introduction to electoral law, policy, and procedures for the information and guidance of all interested parties. The AEC's Backgrounder on Constitutional disqualification and intending candidates assists candidates in understanding their obligation to ensure that they are legally qualified to nominate and, in particular, that they are not disqualified by Section 44 of the Constitution.

The AEC advises candidates that providing "false or misleading information" or "omitting any information that would be misleading" on their nomination form is a criminal offence punishable by up to 12 months in prison. However, it does not explicitly state that such a conviction could result in disqualification under Section 44(ii).

The AEC's Backgrounder also highlights that the Court of Disputed Returns (the Court) has the final say on the interpretation of the law in specific cases, and the AEC's publication should not be considered legal advice.

While the AEC does not administer the Constitution, it plays a role in providing guidance to candidates on their obligations and qualifications under Section 44. It also directs candidates to seek their legal advice regarding their eligibility, especially concerning potential dual citizenship under foreign law, as addressed in Section 44(i).

Frequently asked questions