Understanding Radical Political Economy: A Critical Approach To Capitalism And Power

Radical political economy is a critical and interdisciplinary approach to understanding economic systems, rooted in Marxist, feminist, and postcolonial theories. It challenges mainstream neoclassical economics by examining how power, inequality, and exploitation are embedded in capitalist structures. Unlike orthodox economics, which often assumes market efficiency and individual rationality, radical political economy focuses on the historical, social, and political contexts that shape economic relations. It critiques the concentration of wealth and resources, the role of class struggle, and the global impact of imperialism and colonialism. By prioritizing social justice and transformative change, radical political economy seeks to expose the systemic roots of economic inequality and propose alternative models that prioritize collective well-being over profit-driven growth.

Explore related products

Radical Political Economy: A Concise Introduction

$38.27 $71.99

Radical Political Economy

$63.47 $68.95

Contesting the Global Order: The Radical Political Economy of Perry Anderson and Immanuel Wallerstein (New Political Science)

$33.42 $99

Radical Political Economy: Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis

$47.11 $61.99

The Challenge of Radical Political Economy: An Introduction To the Alternatives to Neo-Classical Economics

$103.5

Foundations of Radical Political Economy

$53.22 $61.99

Marxist Theory: Examines capitalism's contradictions, class struggle, and labor exploitation as core economic drivers

Marxist theory stands as a cornerstone of radical political economy, offering a critical framework for understanding capitalism’s inherent contradictions, class dynamics, and the exploitation of labor as fundamental drivers of economic systems. At its core, Marxism posits that capitalism is not a neutral or natural economic order but a historically specific mode of production characterized by antagonistic relationships between social classes. The primary contradiction Marx identifies is that between the social nature of production and the private appropriation of surplus value. Under capitalism, workers collectively produce goods and services, yet the fruits of their labor are disproportionately claimed by the capitalist class, which owns the means of production. This contradiction generates systemic instability and conflict, as the interests of the working class (proletariat) and the capitalist class (bourgeoisie) are irreconcilably opposed.

Class struggle is central to Marxist theory, serving as the engine of historical change. Marx argues that society is divided into classes based on their relationship to the means of production. The bourgeoisie, who own capital and control production, exploit the proletariat, who sell their labor power to survive. This exploitation manifests in the extraction of surplus value—the difference between the value workers create and the wages they receive. For Marx, this is not merely an economic process but a deeply political one, as it perpetuates inequality and reinforces the dominance of the capitalist class. The inherent conflict between these classes is not just a matter of economic disparity but a struggle over power, resources, and the very structure of society.

Labor exploitation is another critical aspect of Marxist analysis. Marx distinguishes between labor power (the capacity to work) and labor itself (the activity of working). Workers sell their labor power in exchange for wages, but the value they produce exceeds what they are paid. This surplus value is the source of capitalist profit. Marx’s labor theory of value reveals how capitalism systematically undervalues labor, as workers are compensated only for their subsistence and reproduction, while the surplus they generate is appropriated by capitalists. This exploitation is not accidental but structural, embedded in the logic of capitalist accumulation. By focusing on labor as the source of value, Marx highlights the moral and economic injustice at the heart of capitalism.

Marxist theory also examines how capitalism’s contradictions lead to periodic crises. The drive for profit incentivizes capitalists to reinvest in production, but this can lead to overproduction and underconsumption, as workers’ wages are suppressed, limiting their ability to purchase goods. This cyclical crisis tendency underscores the unsustainability of capitalism and its inability to provide long-term stability. Additionally, Marx critiques the alienation of labor under capitalism, where workers are estranged from the products of their labor, the process of production, and their fellow workers. This alienation is both a symptom and a consequence of capitalist exploitation, further entrenching class divisions.

In radical political economy, Marxist theory serves as a tool for critiquing capitalism and envisioning alternatives. By exposing the contradictions, class struggles, and labor exploitation inherent in capitalism, Marx provides a foundation for understanding economic inequality and injustice. His analysis goes beyond mere description, offering a call to action for transformative change. For Marx, the resolution of capitalism’s contradictions lies in the abolition of class society and the establishment of a socialist system where production is organized for human need rather than profit. This revolutionary perspective distinguishes Marxist theory within radical political economy, making it a powerful framework for both critique and emancipation.

Institutional Analysis: Studies power structures, state roles, and institutions shaping economic outcomes

Radical political economy (RPE) is an interdisciplinary approach that critiques mainstream economic theories by examining the underlying power structures, class relations, and historical contexts that shape economic systems. It challenges the neoclassical focus on market equilibrium and individual rationality, instead emphasizing how social, political, and institutional forces create and perpetuate inequalities. Institutional analysis is a cornerstone of RPE, as it focuses on understanding how power structures, state roles, and institutions influence economic outcomes. This analysis goes beyond formal rules and organizations to explore how informal norms, cultural practices, and historical legacies shape economic behavior and distribution.

In the context of RPE, institutional analysis scrutinizes the ways in which institutions—defined broadly as rules, norms, and organizations—are not neutral but are instead designed and maintained by dominant classes to serve their interests. For example, the state is often analyzed as a contested terrain where different class interests clash, rather than as a neutral arbiter of economic activity. RPE scholars argue that institutions like property rights, financial systems, and labor laws are structured to benefit capital over labor, reinforcing existing power hierarchies. By examining these institutions, RPE seeks to uncover how economic systems are systematically biased toward certain groups, often at the expense of the working class, marginalized communities, and the environment.

The role of the state is a central focus in institutional analysis within RPE. Unlike neoclassical economics, which often treats the state as an external regulator or corrector of market failures, RPE views the state as an active participant in shaping economic outcomes. The state is seen as a site of struggle where capitalist interests, labor movements, and other social forces vie for influence. For instance, state policies on taxation, welfare, and industrial regulation are analyzed to reveal how they either entrench or challenge capitalist dominance. RPE scholars also explore how international institutions, such as the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund, function to maintain global economic inequalities by imposing neoliberal policies on developing nations.

Power structures are another critical component of institutional analysis in RPE. This involves studying how power is distributed and exercised within economic institutions, often through mechanisms like ownership, control over resources, and decision-making authority. RPE highlights how these power structures are not natural but are historically and socially constructed. For example, the concentration of wealth and corporate power is examined as a result of institutional arrangements that favor capital accumulation over social welfare. By analyzing these structures, RPE aims to expose the ways in which economic systems are designed to reproduce inequality and exploitation.

Finally, institutional analysis in RPE is inherently normative, seeking not only to understand how institutions shape economic outcomes but also to propose alternatives that promote greater equality and justice. This involves critiquing existing institutions and imagining transformative changes, such as democratizing workplaces, redefining property rights, or creating public institutions that prioritize social needs over profit. By grounding its analysis in historical and empirical evidence, RPE provides a framework for understanding the role of institutions in perpetuating economic injustice and offers a roadmap for building more equitable economic systems. In this way, institutional analysis is both a diagnostic tool and a call to action within the broader project of radical political economy.

Feminist Economics: Highlights gender inequalities in labor, care work, and economic systems

Feminist economics is a critical and transformative approach within the broader framework of radical political economy, focusing on dismantling gender inequalities embedded in labor, care work, and economic systems. It challenges traditional economic theories that often overlook or devalue women’s contributions, particularly in unpaid care work, and highlights how patriarchal structures perpetuate economic disparities. By centering gender as a category of analysis, feminist economics exposes the ways in which capitalism and neoliberal policies exploit women’s labor while reinforcing their marginalization in both formal and informal economies. This perspective argues that economic systems are not gender-neutral but are fundamentally shaped by and reinforcing of gender hierarchies.

One of the core concerns of feminist economics is the undervaluation and invisibility of care work, which includes activities like childcare, eldercare, and domestic labor. Mainstream economics often excludes these tasks from GDP calculations, treating them as non-productive, despite their essential role in sustaining societies and economies. Feminist economists argue that care work is a foundation of economic activity, yet it is disproportionately performed by women, often unpaid or underpaid. This unequal distribution of care responsibilities limits women’s participation in the formal labor market, perpetuates their economic dependence, and reinforces gendered poverty. By highlighting the economic value of care work, feminist economics calls for policies that recognize, reduce, and redistribute care burdens.

Gender inequalities in the labor market are another central focus of feminist economics. Women face systemic barriers such as wage gaps, occupational segregation, and limited access to leadership positions. These disparities are not accidental but are rooted in discriminatory practices, cultural norms, and institutional biases. Feminist economists critique traditional labor market theories for ignoring the ways in which gender shapes employment opportunities and outcomes. They advocate for policies like equal pay legislation, affordable childcare, and anti-discrimination measures to address these inequalities. Additionally, they emphasize the need to challenge the gendered division of labor, which confines women to low-wage, precarious jobs while men dominate higher-paying sectors.

Feminist economics also critiques the global economic system, particularly its impact on women in the Global South. Neoliberal policies, such as austerity measures and trade liberalization, often exacerbate gender inequalities by cutting social services, increasing women’s unpaid care burdens, and pushing them into exploitative labor conditions. For instance, women in developing countries are frequently employed in export-oriented industries like textiles or as domestic workers, where they face poor wages, unsafe conditions, and limited labor rights. Feminist economists argue that these global economic structures are inherently gendered and call for alternatives that prioritize women’s economic empowerment and social justice.

Finally, feminist economics proposes radical reimagining of economic systems to achieve gender equality. This includes advocating for a care-centered economy that values reproductive labor, promotes work-life balance, and ensures social reproduction is a collective responsibility. It also involves challenging the growth-centric model of capitalism, which prioritizes profit over people and the planet. Feminist economists propose alternative frameworks, such as a universal basic income, reduced working hours, and cooperative models of production, to create more equitable and sustainable economies. By addressing gender inequalities in labor, care work, and economic systems, feminist economics offers a powerful critique and vision for transforming the global economy into one that serves all people, regardless of gender.

Explore related products

Radical Political Economy: Sraffa Versus Marx

$47.45 $54.99

International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth

$78.4

The Wealth of Freedom: Radical Republican Political Economy

$120.88 $130

The Value of Radical Theory

$9.99

The Elgar Companion to Radical Political Economy

$306

Political Economy (New World Paperbacks)

$11.1 $19.99

Ecology and Economy: Critiques capitalism's environmental degradation and advocates sustainable alternatives

Radical political economy (RPE) is an interdisciplinary approach that critiques the foundational structures of capitalism, focusing on issues of power, inequality, and exploitation. It challenges mainstream economic theories by emphasizing how capitalism inherently prioritizes profit over social and environmental well-being. Within this framework, the intersection of ecology and economy emerges as a critical area of analysis, particularly in addressing capitalism’s environmental degradation and advocating for sustainable alternatives. This perspective argues that capitalism’s relentless pursuit of growth and accumulation is incompatible with ecological sustainability, leading to irreversible harm to the planet.

Capitalism’s environmental degradation is rooted in its core logic: the commodification of nature and the externalization of environmental costs. Under capitalism, natural resources are treated as infinite inputs for production, while the ecological consequences—such as pollution, deforestation, and climate change—are often ignored or shifted onto communities and future generations. Radical political economy critiques this system by highlighting how capitalism’s profit-driven model systematically depletes ecosystems, disrupts biodiversity, and exacerbates global environmental crises. For instance, industries like fossil fuels, agriculture, and manufacturing thrive by exploiting natural resources without accounting for the long-term ecological damage they cause.

The critique extends beyond mere observation of environmental harm; it identifies the structural causes within capitalism. RPE scholars argue that the imperative for continuous growth, competition, and capital accumulation drives firms and states to prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. This dynamic is further exacerbated by global inequalities, as wealthier nations often outsource environmental degradation to poorer regions through practices like resource extraction and waste dumping. Thus, capitalism’s environmental crisis is not a failure of regulation or management but a direct consequence of its underlying principles.

In response to this critique, radical political economy advocates for sustainable alternatives that challenge the dominance of capitalist systems. These alternatives include ecological socialism, degrowth, and commons-based economies, which prioritize social and environmental well-being over profit. Ecological socialism, for example, proposes collective ownership of resources and democratic control of production to ensure sustainable use of the environment. Degrowth challenges the growth-centric paradigm, advocating for reduced consumption, localized economies, and a focus on human and ecological flourishing. Commons-based economies emphasize shared management of resources, fostering community-driven sustainability.

Implementing these alternatives requires transformative changes in economic structures and power relations. RPE emphasizes the need for grassroots movements, policy reforms, and international cooperation to dismantle the capitalist framework that perpetuates environmental degradation. This includes redefining progress beyond GDP growth, investing in renewable energy, and ensuring equitable access to resources. By centering ecology within economic systems, radical political economy offers a vision of sustainability that is both socially just and environmentally regenerative, challenging the destructive status quo of capitalism.

Global Inequality: Analyzes imperialism, neocolonialism, and unequal exchange in the world economy

Radical political economy (RPE) is a critical approach to understanding economic systems, emphasizing the role of power, class, and historical structures in shaping global inequalities. It challenges mainstream economic theories by highlighting how capitalism inherently produces and reproduces disparities, both within and between nations. Central to RPE is the analysis of imperialism, neocolonialism, and unequal exchange as mechanisms that sustain global inequality. These concepts reveal how dominant nations and transnational corporations exploit peripheral regions, ensuring the continued flow of wealth from the Global South to the Global North.

Imperialism, as analyzed by RPE scholars like Lenin and Hobson, refers to the expansion of capitalist systems through political, economic, and military domination. Historically, imperial powers colonized territories to extract resources, establish markets, and secure strategic advantages. While formal colonialism has largely ended, its legacy persists in the form of neocolonialism. Neocolonialism operates through economic and financial mechanisms, such as debt dependency, structural adjustment programs, and trade agreements that favor wealthy nations. Institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank often enforce policies that undermine the economic sovereignty of developing countries, perpetuating their subordinate position in the global economy.

Unequal exchange is another key concept in RPE, describing the systemic undervaluation of labor and resources from the Global South. This phenomenon is rooted in the global division of labor, where core countries specialize in high-value industries (e.g., technology, finance) while peripheral countries are confined to low-value sectors (e.g., agriculture, raw materials). As a result, the terms of trade consistently favor wealthy nations, allowing them to extract surplus value from poorer regions. This process is exacerbated by multinational corporations that exploit cheap labor and lax regulations in developing countries, further entrenching global inequality.

The interplay of imperialism, neocolonialism, and unequal exchange creates a world economy characterized by stark disparities in wealth, income, and development. For instance, African nations rich in minerals and oil often remain impoverished due to exploitative trade relationships and foreign control over their resources. Similarly, Latin American countries struggle with debt burdens imposed by international financial institutions, limiting their ability to invest in social programs or infrastructure. RPE argues that these dynamics are not accidental but are inherent to the capitalist system, which prioritizes profit over human well-being.

To address global inequality, RPE advocates for transformative solutions that challenge the structures of domination. This includes debt cancellation, fair trade policies, and the democratization of international institutions. Additionally, RPE emphasizes the importance of solidarity movements and grassroots struggles in the Global South, as these efforts often lead to meaningful resistance against neocolonial exploitation. By exposing the root causes of inequality, RPE provides a framework for understanding and combating the injustices of the global economic order, offering a path toward a more equitable and just world.

Frequently asked questions