Understanding The Definition Of "Constitutional

Constitutional law is a broad area of law that deals with the interpretation, implementation, and amendment of a country or state's constitution, as well as the fundamental principles that govern the distribution of power and the rights of individuals. The US Constitution, for example, has been the ruling law of the land for over 200 years, influencing the daily lives of Americans in areas such as civil rights, criminal law, and free speech. The US Constitution is arranged by a preamble, articles, and amendments, with the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights, which outlines the fundamental rights of the people in relation to the government.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.39 $359

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The US Constitution and its Amendments

The US Constitution is a foundational legal document that outlines the core principles, structures, and powers of the US government. It establishes a federal system with checks and balances to protect individual rights and maintain a balance between the powers of the federal government and those of the states.

The Constitution has been amended several times since its ratification in 1789 to address specific issues and evolving societal needs. Amendments are made through a formal process, requiring the proposal and ratification of changes by a supermajority of two-thirds in both houses of Congress or by a constitutional convention requested by two-thirds of state legislatures, and subsequent ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures or state ratifying conventions.

Amendments to the Constitution have played a significant role in shaping the course of American history and addressing societal changes. The first ten amendments, collectively known as the Bill of Rights, were adopted in 1791 and focus on protecting individual liberties and preventing governmental abuse of power. These amendments guarantee a range of rights, including freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, and the right to bear arms. They also set limits on the powers of the government, such as prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures and ensuring the right to a speedy trial.

Beyond the Bill of Rights, subsequent amendments have addressed a variety of issues. For example, the Eleventh Amendment, ratified in 1795, clarified the extent of the judicial power of the federal government, limiting the ability of citizens to bring suits against states in federal courts. The Twelfth Amendment, passed in 1804, modified the process for electing the president and vice president, requiring separate ballots for each office.

The process of amending the Constitution demonstrates its adaptability and the founding fathers' foresight in creating a framework that could evolve with the nation. Amendments have been used to abolish policies, such as the repeal of prohibition through the Twenty-First Amendment in 1933, and to address pressing societal issues, like the Fourteenth Amendment's granting of citizenship and equal protection under the law to all persons born or naturalized in the United States following the Civil War.

The Bill of Rights

The amendments of the Bill of Rights add to the Constitution specific guarantees of personal freedoms, such as freedom of speech, the right to publish, practice religion, possess firearms, and assemble. They also include other natural and legal rights, such as the right to be secure in one's person, house, papers, and effects, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Initially, James Madison, an opponent of a Bill of Rights, argued that the Constitution did not grant the federal government the power to take away people's rights. He also stated that the state bills of rights offered only an illusion of protection against tyranny. However, Madison's proposed amendments included extending the protection of some of the Bill of Rights to the states.

The Separation of Powers

The term "constitutional" is an adjective that relates to or affects the constitution of a body or mind. It can also refer to the fundamental makeup of something, such as a government or a person. In the context of government and politics, it means having to do with the document that is the foundation of a government, i.e., the constitution. This document outlines the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or social group, determining the powers and duties of the government and guaranteeing certain rights to the people.

Now, the separation of powers is a principle derived from the text and structure of a constitution. It functionally differentiates several types of state power, most commonly the legislative, executive, and judicial functions, and requires these operations of government to be conceptually and institutionally distinguishable. This means that each branch of government has specified duties that are independent of the other branches, preventing any one branch from holding all the power.

The doctrine of separation of powers can be traced back to ancient and medieval theories of mixed government, which argued that the processes of government should involve different elements of society, such as monarchic, aristocratic, and democratic interests. The first modern formulation of this doctrine was by the French political philosopher Montesquieu in "De l’esprit des lois" ("The Spirit of Laws") in 1748. Montesquieu's argument was inspired by the English constitution and the Constitution of the Roman Republic, which he believed had powers separated to prevent the usurpation of complete power.

In practice, the separation of powers divides the government into structurally independent branches, each performing distinct functions. For example, in the United States, the Legislative Power is vested in Congress, the Executive Power in the President, and the Judicial Power in the Supreme Court and lower courts. This distribution of power is intended to preserve individual liberty and prevent arbitrary and oppressive government action, as concentrating power in a single entity could lead to tyranny.

However, modern constitutional systems have shown a variety of arrangements, and the doctrine has lost some of its rigidity. After World War II, there was an enlargement of executive power, leading some to favour establishing means of appeal against executive decisions rather than reasserting the doctrine of separation of powers. Nonetheless, the separation of powers remains an important concept in constitutional governments, ensuring a balance of power and protecting the rights and liberties of citizens.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

The Influence of Natural Law

The US Constitution is built on the foundation of natural law. Natural law is a philosophy that was held by the Founding Fathers, and it is key to understanding the spirit and terms of the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.

Natural law includes the concept of "natural rights", which are rights that everyone has by virtue of their existence and which are equal for all. These natural rights specify what acts one person cannot morally do to another, such as infringing on their right to life, liberty, and property. These rights are protected by the Ninth Amendment, which states that enumerating certain rights in the Constitution does not mean that other natural rights are any less protected. For example, the right to freedom of speech is a natural right that is specifically protected by the Constitution, but this does not mean that other natural rights, such as the right to jump up and down or sing a song, are any less valid or important.

The Founding Fathers wanted to provide explicit protections for at least some of these natural rights out of caution that a tyrannical government could improperly ignore them. This was a recognition that natural rights pre-exist government and are therefore not granted by the government but are instead inherent to all people.

The natural law philosophy is distinct from common law, which was developed by judges over generations to create a well-known "common" set of rules. However, it is important to note that the two are often entwined, and judges of the era intended to use natural law to determine the common law rules.

The Judicial Review

I am unable to perform a search using your requested method. However, here is some information on the judicial review.

Judicial review is a process of evaluating the legality of a decision made by a public body, such as a government agency or a court. It is a mechanism to hold these bodies accountable to the rule of law and ensure that they act within their designated powers. The focus is on the decision-making process and its compliance with legal standards, rather than the decision's actual content or outcome.

In a judicial review, a court examines whether a public body's decision was made according to the correct procedure, if relevant facts were taken into account, and if the decision was reasonable and proportional. It does not consider the merits of the decision itself but rather the lawfulness of the process.

The threshold for a successful judicial review is high, as it is not a means to appeal a decision one disagrees with. Instead, it addresses whether a decision was made lawfully and rationally. Common grounds for a judicial review include procedural impropriety, where the decision-maker failed to follow the correct process; irrationality, where the decision was so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have made it; illegality, where the decision-maker acted beyond their powers or contrary to law; and proportionality, where the decision was disproportionate to the aim it sought to achieve.

Any individual or organisation adversely affected by a public body's decision can typically apply for a judicial review. The process usually involves an oral hearing, where the court will consider evidence and arguments from both sides before delivering a judgment. Remedies for a successful judicial review can include quashing the original decision, requiring the public body to act in a certain way, or declaring the applicant's legal rights.

Judicial reviews play a crucial role in maintaining the rule of law and safeguarding citizens' rights by ensuring that public bodies exercise their powers lawfully and respect the boundaries of their authority.

Frequently asked questions