Corruption Of Blood: Understanding The Constitution's Ban

what is corruption of blood in the constitution

The concept of corruption of blood is a legal term that appears in the US Constitution's Article III, which deals with the judicial department and the punishment of treason. It refers to the consequences of an attainder of treason, where a person convicted of treason is barred from inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title. In other words, it prohibits the family members of the convicted traitor from receiving or inheriting property, treating the heirs as if they were illegitimate. This provision in the US Constitution is designed to prevent undue punishment of the families of traitors and narrow the scope of punishment compared to English common law.

Characteristics Values
Definition The effect of an attainder which bars a person from inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title
Treason Congress has the power to declare the punishment of treason
Punishment Confiscation of property, rendering heirs ineligible to hold public offices or peerages
Scope Narrowed the scope of punishment for treason as compared to English common law
Application Applies only to Americans who have betrayed the allegiance they are presumed to owe the United States

cycivic

Corruption of blood is a reference to English common law

"Corruption of blood" is a legal term that refers to the effects of an attainder, which bars a person and their heirs from inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title. This concept is referenced in the US Constitution, which states that "no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood". This clause is a departure from English common law, which allowed for more severe punishments for treason, including the corruption of blood.

Under English common law, a person convicted of treason could be sentenced to corruption of blood, which prohibited their family members from receiving or inheriting property from them. This effectively treated the heirs of the convicted person as illegitimate. The US Constitution narrowed the scope of punishment for treason, prohibiting any attainder of treason from working corruption of blood beyond the life of the person convicted.

The inclusion of this clause in the US Constitution reflects the Framers' desire to guard against the historic use of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to silence legitimate political opposition. By prohibiting the corruption of blood, the Constitution ensures that the punishment for treason does not extend to the family members of the convicted person. This provision also aligns with the US constitutional principle that individuals cannot be declared guilty of crimes by legislative act and cannot be sentenced for crimes that take property or rights from their family or heirs.

The concept of corruption of blood is closely tied to the idea of a "Bill of Attainder," which was used in English law during the late Medieval and early modern periods. A Bill of Attainder declared a person guilty of a crime, often treason, without any trial or legal process, and often included the confiscation of the convicted person's property. This practice was viewed with horror during the colonial period and before, as it resulted in severe consequences for the convicted person and their heirs.

In summary, "corruption of blood" is a reference to English common law, where it was used as a punishment for treason, prohibiting family members from inheriting property from a person convicted of treason. The US Constitution specifically prohibits this practice, limiting the scope of punishment for treason to the convicted person's lifetime. This provision protects the rights of individuals and their heirs and safeguards against the misuse of treason prosecutions.

Wall Emergency: Is It Constitutional?

You may want to see also

cycivic

Congress has the power to declare punishment for treason

The US Constitution grants Congress the power to declare the punishment for treason. This is outlined in Article III, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution, also known as the Treason Clause. The clause states: "The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

Treason is defined as a breach of allegiance and can be committed by those who owe allegiance to the United States, either perpetual or temporary. This includes citizens and, as established in the case of United States v. Wiltberger in 1820, enemy aliens residing in US territory.

The Treason Clause narrows the scope of punishment for treason compared to English common law. While Congress has the power to establish penalties for treason, it may not impose "corruption of blood". This term refers to the English common law practice of prohibiting family members of a person convicted of treason from receiving or inheriting property from that person. Under the US Constitution, such punishment may not extend beyond the lifetime of the convicted individual.

The Confiscation Act of 1862, which aimed to punish treason and rebellion, raised questions about the limits of presidential authority under Article III, § 3, cl. 2. To address this, an explanatory joint resolution was issued, clarifying that only a life estate could be sold, and that the offender's children could inherit the property upon the offender's death.

In summary, Congress has the authority to establish penalties for treason, but it cannot impose corruption of blood, ensuring that the punishment does not extend to the family members of the convicted individual beyond their lifetime.

cycivic

Corruption of blood bars a person from inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title

"Corruption of blood" is a legal term referring to the effects of an attainder, which bars a person from inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title. This concept is often associated with treason and was addressed in the US Constitution to prevent its use as a form of punishment.

The Constitution specifically grants Congress the power to declare the punishment for treason but prohibits any attainder of treason from working corruption of blood or forfeiture beyond the lifetime of the person convicted. This provision was included to guard against the historical use of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to target legitimate political opposition.

Historically, corruption of blood was associated with bills of attainder, which declared a person guilty of a crime, often treason, without a trial or legal process. These bills often resulted in the confiscation of property and prevented heirs from inheriting, effectively treating them as illegitimate. The US Constitution prohibits such legislative acts that declare individuals guilty of crimes and confiscate property or rights from their families or heirs.

The concept of corruption of blood has been referenced in legal cases, such as United States v. Wiltberger in 1820, which involved a conviction for manslaughter and treason. Chief Justice Marshall's statements in this case provided insights into the understanding of treason and allegiance. Additionally, the Confiscation Act of 1862, aimed at suppressing insurrection and punishing treason, raised issues related to corruption of blood and property confiscation.

In conclusion, "corruption of blood" in the US Constitution refers to the effect of attainder, specifically prohibiting the punishment of treason from barring an individual's heirs from inheriting property or transmitting titles. This provision ensures that the punishment does not extend beyond the convicted person's lifetime and protects the rights of their descendants.

cycivic

The US Constitution prohibits declaring people guilty of crimes by legislative act

The US Constitution prohibits declaring people guilty of crimes, particularly treason, by legislative act. This is known as "corruption of blood".

Corruption of blood refers to the effect of a Bill of Attainder, which declares a person guilty of a crime, often treason, without any trial or other legal process. It also confiscates the convicted person's property, preventing their heirs from inheriting and possibly rendering those heirs illegitimate and ineligible to hold public offices or peerages. In other words, it bars a person from "inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title".

The US Constitution's Treason Clause specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the United States and limits the offence to two types of conduct: "levying war" against the US or "adhering to [its] enemies". The Constitution also narrowed the scope of punishment for treason compared to English common law, which included corruption of blood. While Congress has the power to establish penalties for treason, it may not "work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person" convicted. This means that the punishment cannot extend beyond the lifetime of the person convicted of treason.

The Confiscation Act of 1862, which aimed to "seize and confiscate the Property of Rebels", raised issues under the Constitution's provisions on corruption of blood. To address this, an explanatory joint resolution was issued, stipulating that only a life estate could be sold and that the offender's children could inherit without deriving any title from the US government.

cycivic

Treason is the only crime expressly defined by the US Constitution

Treason is the only crime that is expressly defined by the US Constitution. The Constitution describes treason as the act of waging war against the United States or materially aiding its enemies. The Framers of the Constitution intended to define treason narrowly, in contrast to English law, which had a broader definition of treason that covered many actions against the Crown. The Framers also wanted to make it challenging to establish that someone had committed treason, and to restrict Congress's power to change the definition of the crime or the evidence required to prove it.

The Treason Clause in the Constitution requires that at least two witnesses testify to the overt act in question, and limits Congress's ability to punish the crime of treason. This was included to protect against false or flimsy prosecutions, and to prevent a corrupt executive or Congress from expanding the definition of treason. The Framers were wary of vesting the power to declare and punish treason in Congress, as they had seen how the English kings and British Parliament had used treason charges to eliminate political dissidents.

To convict someone of treason for giving aid or comfort to an enemy, the government must prove two elements: adherence or loyalty to an enemy of the United States, and the provision of aid or comfort to that enemy. Treason cannot exist if either of these elements is missing. For example, a US citizen may hold beliefs that are disloyal to the United States, but as long as they do not act on these beliefs by aiding the enemy, they have not committed treason.

While treason charges have become rare, with Congress only bringing charges 30 times since the Constitution's ratification, the Treason Clause is still relevant today. For example, in the indictment against Adam Gadahn, treason charges were brought.

Frequently asked questions

Corruption of blood is a reference to English common law, which prohibited family members from, among other things, receiving or inheriting property from a person convicted of treason.

The term "corruption of blood" originates from English common law, where it was used to refer to the prohibition on family members inheriting property from a person convicted of treason.

Corruption of blood prevented family members of a person convicted of treason from inheriting or receiving any property or assets from the convicted person.

The US Constitution specifically states that "no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood", thereby prohibiting the practice of corruption of blood and ensuring that family members of a person convicted of treason are not penalized.

The provision ensures that the punishment for treason does not extend beyond the person convicted, protecting the rights and interests of their family members. It also guards against the misuse of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to target legitimate political opposition.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment