The Constitution's Foes: What Could Have Been?

The ratification of the US Constitution was a contentious process, with strong opposition from Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution consolidated too much power in Congress and the presidency, resembling a monarchy. They advocated for a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties, arguing that power should reside in state governments. Led by influential figures such as Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams, they mobilized across state legislatures, making ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, supported ratification, arguing for a strong central government with checks and balances. The debate sparked intense national discussion, with grassroots opposition and Federalist manipulation tactics. Despite the opposition, the Constitution was ratified, but the Anti-Federalists' legacy was their contribution to stressing the need for a Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Partners and Rivals

$19.98 $50

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$32.67

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$6.7 $10

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Anti-Federalists

Opposition to the Constitution began with Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, and George Mason, the "Three Dissenters" who refused to sign the document. Other prominent Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and Richard Henry Lee, heroes of the Revolutionary War. The Anti-Federalists mobilised against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country, particularly in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states. They raised their concerns through speeches, essays, and pamphlets, which later became known as the "Anti-Federalist Papers".

The debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were intense and often divisive. In Massachusetts, arguments between the two groups even erupted in a physical brawl between Elbridge Gerry and Francis Dana. Despite the strong opposition, the Federalists ultimately succeeded in getting the Constitution ratified by promising to support amendments addressing Anti-Federalist concerns, particularly the addition of a Bill of Rights.

The Federalist Papers

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress at the expense of the states. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one. They criticized the absence of a Bill of Rights, arguing that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties. The debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings across the country.

The Bill of Rights

The drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution in the late 1780s sparked a fierce national debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists, including Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, George Mason, Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and Richard Henry Lee, opposed the ratification of the Constitution without a Bill of Rights. They believed that the Constitution consolidated too much power in the federal government and did not adequately protect individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures, particularly in crucial states like Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York. They argued that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one. They also criticized the absence of a Bill of Rights, which they saw as necessary to prevent the federal government from becoming tyrannous.

The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution and argued that it provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They believed that the checks and balances in the Constitution would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.

The ratification process was intense and divisive, with the Federalists ultimately securing ratification in the crucial states. However, they had to make concessions to address Anti-Federalist concerns. Sensing that Anti-Federalist sentiment might sink ratification efforts, James Madison agreed to draft a list of rights that the federal government could not encroach upon. This became the Bill of Rights, a list of ten constitutional amendments guaranteeing fundamental freedoms such as free speech, religion, and the press, as well as protections against government overreach.

Explore related products

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers (Hackett Classics)

$10.59 $29.95

The Federalist Papers, Extended Edition: An Essential Collection of The Original, Unabridged Text (1787–88) With Detailed Commentary on Each Essay to Guide you Through America's Founding Ideas

$24.95

The Anti-Federalist Papers Publisher: Signet Classics

$11.45 $24.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers

$10.95

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

State legislatures

The ratification of the Constitution was a highly contested affair, with opposition from Anti-Federalists in state legislatures across the country. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution consolidated too much power in Congress, detracting from the power of the states. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch, and that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one.

In state legislatures, opponents of the Constitution criticized the extensive powers it granted the federal government and its departure from the republican governments of antiquity. In Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states, Anti-Federalists made ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights. The debates in these states were particularly intense, with Massachusetts and Virginia being historical seats of political radicalism and revolution, and New York being the commercial center of the country.

The Federalists, who supported the Constitution, argued that it provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. To address Anti-Federalist concerns, the Federalists agreed to recommend a Bill of Rights, which helped sway skeptics in several states.

The ratification debates played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings, with both sides publishing essays and speeches to make their case. The Federalists, led by figures such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, used their influence with newspaper publishers to build enthusiasm for the Constitution and discredit opposition. The Anti-Federalists, meanwhile, published essays under pseudonyms like Brutus, Cato, and the Federal Farmer in New York newspapers, critiquing the Constitution.

The Three Dissenters

Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, and George Mason, the "Three Dissenters", refused to sign the Constitution after the Philadelphia Convention. They were the first to oppose the ratification of the Constitution.

Gerry, a Marblehead native, had a stutter and a reputation for being dour, suspicious, and aggressive. He entered politics in 1772 and became a protégé of Samuel Adams, an outspoken advocate of independence. Gerry was an advocate of a strong central government but refused to sign the Constitution, criticising the allocation of three-fifths representation for slaves, the length of senators' terms, and Congress's power to tax, regulate commerce, and raise an army. He worked against ratification in his home state but later declared himself a supporter of the new government and was elected to the first Congress in 1789.

Randolph, a wealthy eighteenth-century Virginian, was educated at the College of William and Mary before studying law with his father. During the Revolution, Randolph supported independence, serving as one of General Washington's aides-de-camp. He played a key role in Virginia's first constitution in 1776. Randolph believed that the Constitution should be amended early on and that any constitution, once ratified, should be changed as little as possible. He also feared that if the people were only given the option to accept or reject the Constitution, they would reject it, leading to disastrous consequences.

Mason, a builder and not a natural dissident, drafted Virginia's first state constitution and the Declaration of Rights, which affirmed that "all men are born equally free and independent". He played a leading role at the Constitutional Convention but refused to sign the Constitution due to its absence of a bill of rights. He actively campaigned against ratification in Virginia, causing a breach in his friendships with Washington and Madison.

The Anti-Federalists, including the Three Dissenters, believed that the Constitution consolidated too much power in Congress and the unitary executive, at the expense of states' rights and individual liberties. They also criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights, arguing that the federal government would become tyrannous without it.

Frequently asked questions