The Two-House Advantage In The Us Constitution

The Constitution of the United States, transcribed by Jacob Shallus, outlines the powers and procedures of a two-house Congress, comprising the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each house has specific roles and responsibilities, including judging the elections, qualifications, and returns of its members, determining rules of proceedings, and keeping a journal of its proceedings. The two-house system also plays a role in the election of the President, with the House of Representatives choosing the President if no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes. Additionally, the two-thirds majority in both houses can propose amendments to the Constitution, demonstrating the significant role of the two-house structure in the US political system.

Explore related products

List Of Members, Officers, Committees And Attaches And The Rules Of The Two Houses Of The California Legislature

$31.95

California Welfare and Institutions Code Part II [2025 Edition]

$39.99

Texas Local Government Code 2024 Edition (Volume 2 of 3)

$44.99 $44.99

Report of the commissioners appointed by the governor under authority of a joint resolution of the two houses of the Legislature of the state of New ... for the assessment and collection of taxes

$18.99

The Revolutionary Soldiers of Delaware, a Paper Read Before the Two Houses of the Delaware Legislature, February 15th, 1875

$10.95

Report of the Commissioners Appointed by the Governor Under Authority of a Joint Resolution of the Two Houses of the Legislature of the State of New York: ... for the Assessment and Collection of Taxes

$8.95

Each House is the judge of its members' elections, returns and qualifications

The U.S. Constitution, at Article I, Section 5, Clause 1, expressly delegates to each house of Congress the authority to judge the qualifications for office of its members. This is outlined as follows: "Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns, and Qualifications of its own Members".

This means that each House of Congress has the power to judge the elections, returns, and qualifications of its members. This includes the power to investigate expenditures made to influence nominations at primary elections. The House or Senate, rather than the courts, is the proper forum for a challenge concerning the qualifications of a member of Congress. This is to prevent any intrusion on the question of its organisation, which would be detrimental to its freedom and independence.

The right of the House to determine the right of each member to a place in that body is essential. While the power of election is vested in the constituency under state laws, it is up to the House to ensure that qualified persons have been elected and that the officers holding the election have made proper returns. This prevents the intrusion of persons who are not duly elected or qualified.

Each House, in judging elections under this clause, acts as a judicial tribunal, with the power to compel the attendance of witnesses and punish perjury. A majority of each House constitutes a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day and compel the attendance of absent members.

A majority of each House constitutes a Quorum to do Business

The United States Constitution provides for a bicameral legislature, consisting of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each state is guaranteed at least one Representative, with the number of Representatives from each state determined by its population. Each state, regardless of population, elects two Senators.

The Constitution outlines the powers and procedures of both houses. One such procedure is the concept of a quorum, which is the minimum number of members required to be present to conduct official business. According to the Constitution, a majority of each house constitutes a quorum to do business. This means that more than half of the members of either the House of Representatives or the Senate must be present to conduct official proceedings and make decisions on behalf of their respective chambers.

The requirement for a quorum ensures that important decisions are made with the input and consent of a substantial portion of each house. It prevents a small minority of members from making decisions on behalf of the entire chamber. This provision in the Constitution promotes democratic principles and helps ensure that the decisions made by each house represent the will of a significant number of its members.

While a majority constitutes a quorum, it is important to note that a smaller number of members may still perform certain functions. For example, a smaller number may adjourn from day to day and may be authorised to compel the attendance of absent members. Additionally, each house has the power to determine the rules of its proceedings, punish members for disorderly behaviour, and keep a journal of its proceedings. These provisions allow for flexibility and efficient management of the legislative process.

In summary, the requirement of a majority quorum in each house of the United States Congress ensures that official business is conducted with the participation of a substantial portion of the members. This constitutional provision upholds the democratic principles on which the United States government was founded.

Each House determines the rules of its proceedings

The US Constitution provides that "Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings". This means that the Senate and the House of Representatives each have the authority to establish their own rules and procedures for conducting business. This is a crucial aspect of the separation of powers and checks and balances within the US government.

The Senate and the House of Representatives are the two chambers of the United States Congress, which is the legislative branch of the federal government. The Senate is sometimes referred to as a "continuing body", meaning that its rules remain in force from one Congress to the next unless they are changed, while the House of Representatives typically readopts its rules at the start of each new Congress.

The rules of each House cover a range of procedural matters, including how to conduct debates, hold votes, and manage the behaviour of members. For example, the Senate has enacted a cloture rule, which requires a supermajority vote (60 votes) to close debate on any matter before the Senate. This rule is intended to prevent the practice of filibustering, where a senator holds the floor for an extended period to delay or block a vote.

Each House also has the power to determine the rules around disciplining and expelling its members. For instance, a member can be expelled with the concurrence of two-thirds of the House. Additionally, the rules outline the requirements for a quorum, which is the minimum number of members that must be present for the House to conduct business.

The right of each House to determine its rules is essential for maintaining the independence and autonomy of the legislative branch. It allows each House to establish procedures that reflect the unique needs and characteristics of its members and the constituencies they represent.

Explore related products

First-second Report S of the Commissioners, Appointed by the Governor Under Authority of a Joint Resolution of the Two Houses of the Legislature of the ... for the Assessment and Collection of Taxes

$8.95

A Discourse, Delivered Before the Lieutenant-governor, the Council, and two Houses Composing the Legislature of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, May 31, 1809: Being the day of General Election

$26.95

Journal of the House of Representatives, Volume 2

$26.95

List of Members, Officers and Committees and Rules of the Two Houses of the Nevada Legislature 1917 Leather Bound

$17.75

Manual, Containing The Rules Of The Senate And House Of Representatives, Of The State Of Michigan And Joint Rules Of The Two Houses And Other Matter

$31.95

Answer of the Whig Members of the Legislature of Massachusetts, Constituting a Majority of Both Branches, to the Address of His Excellency Marcus ... of the Two Houses, January 22, 1840

$24.95

Each House keeps a Journal of its proceedings

The United States Constitution, in Article I, lays down specific provisions regarding the functioning of each House of Congress. One such provision mandates that "Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings".

This provision ensures transparency and accountability in the legislative process by requiring each House of Congress, namely the House of Representatives and the Senate, to maintain a detailed record of its activities. The Journal of Proceedings serves as an official document that chronicles the deliberations, debates, and decisions made by each House during its legislative sessions.

The Journal encompasses a comprehensive account of the proceedings, including the introduction of bills, amendments, motions, and votes. It captures the discussions and exchanges that take place on the House floor, providing insights into the rationale behind legislative actions. This record-keeping practice is essential for ensuring transparency in governance, allowing citizens, scholars, and future legislators to understand the legislative process, track the progress of legislation, and hold their representatives accountable for their decisions.

While the Journal of Proceedings is meant to be a public record, there are provisions for maintaining confidentiality when necessary. Certain sensitive matters or classified information may be excluded from the published Journal. The Constitution grants each House the discretion to determine which parts of its proceedings require secrecy and may be withheld from public disclosure. This flexibility ensures that national security concerns or delicate diplomatic matters can be addressed without compromising transparency in other areas.

The Constitution further stipulates that the Yeas and Nays of the Members on any question shall be entered into the Journal upon the request of at least one-fifth of the Members present. This ensures that the positions and votes of individual legislators on specific issues are recorded for posterity, promoting personal accountability and providing valuable insights into the dynamics of legislative decision-making.

The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeachment

The Constitution of the United States provides for a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate, each with distinct powers and responsibilities. One of the most significant powers vested in the House of Representatives is the sole power of impeachment.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution grants the House of Representatives the exclusive authority to initiate impeachment proceedings against federal officials, including the President. This power is a fundamental component of the system of "checks and balances" established by the Constitution, allowing Congress to hold the executive branch accountable.

The House of Representatives has the authority to determine when impeachment proceedings are appropriate for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." While the Constitution does not define "high Crimes and Misdemeanors", it grants the House discretion in interpreting this standard and deciding when impeachment is warranted. The House may bring impeachment charges as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities, often through a resolution introduced by a lawmaker or by authorising an inquiry.

The impeachment process in the House involves several steps. It typically begins with the introduction of an impeachment resolution or the initiation of an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary, or special committees, investigate the charges and decide whether to pursue articles of impeachment. If the articles are adopted by a simple majority vote, the House appoints members to manage the ensuing Senate trial, acting as prosecutors. The House has initiated impeachment proceedings more than 60 times, with roughly a third resulting in full impeachments.

While the House has the sole power to impeach, the Senate serves as the sole court for impeachment trials, trying and deciding the fate of impeached officials. After receiving the articles of impeachment from the House, the Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment, considering evidence, hearing witnesses, and voting to acquit or convict. If convicted, the sanctions for an impeached individual can include removal from office and potential disqualification from holding future office, but they may still face criminal liability in civil courts.

Frequently asked questions