Understanding The 11Th Amendment: States' Rights And Sovereign Immunity

The Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution, passed by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified on February 7, 1795, restricts the ability of individuals to bring suit against states of which they are not citizens in federal court. The amendment was adopted following the Supreme Court's ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia, where the Court held that federal courts had the authority to hear cases brought against states by private citizens and that states did not have sovereign immunity from such suits. The Eleventh Amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gives diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary, by specifying that federal courts do not have the authority to hear cases brought against a state by citizens of another state or foreign citizens.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$239.21 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$305

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

The Eleventh Amendment restricts the ability of individuals to bring suit against states

The Eleventh Amendment was passed by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified by the states on February 7, 1795. It was the first Constitutional amendment adopted after the Bill of Rights. The amendment was proposed in response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), where the Court held that federal courts could hear cases brought by private citizens against states and that states did not have sovereign immunity from such suits.

The Eleventh Amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gives diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary to hear cases "between a state and citizens of another state." The amendment established that federal courts do not have the authority to hear cases brought by private parties against a state of which they are not citizens. However, it is important to note that the amendment did not bar all lawsuits against states in federal courts. For example, it did not prevent suits against states when a matter of federal law was at issue or suits brought by a state's own citizens.

The Supreme Court has also interpreted the Eleventh Amendment to mean that state courts do not have to hear certain suits against the state if those suits are based on federal law. Additionally, the Court has held that Congress can abrogate state sovereign immunity when using its authority under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. While the Eleventh Amendment provides broad sovereign immunity to states from suit, the Supreme Court does allow suits against state officers in certain circumstances, such as when seeking court orders to prevent future violations of federal law.

Federal courts cannot hear cases against states by citizens of another state or country

The Eleventh Amendment (Amendment XI) restricts the ability of individuals to bring suit against states of which they are not citizens in federal court. The text of the amendment prohibits federal courts from hearing cases brought against a state by citizens of another state or country. This concept is known as "sovereign immunity", which protects states from certain types of legal liability.

The Eleventh Amendment was passed by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified by the states on February 7, 1795. It was proposed in response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), where the Court held that federal courts could hear cases brought by private citizens against states and that states did not have sovereign immunity from such suits. The amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gives diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary to hear cases "between a state and citizens of another state".

While the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from hearing suits against a state by citizens of another state or country, it does not prohibit all lawsuits against states in federal courts. For example, suits against a state brought by its own citizens are not prevented by the amendment. Additionally, the Supreme Court has allowed suits against state officers in certain circumstances, such as when seeking court orders to prevent future violations of federal law.

The Eleventh Amendment has also been interpreted to mean that state courts do not have to hear certain suits against the state if those suits are based on federal law. This interpretation gives states broad sovereign immunity from suit, while also shaping the nature of judicial remedies available against states and their officials for alleged violations of law.

State courts do not have to hear suits against the state if based on federal law

The Eleventh Amendment (Amendment XI) restricts the ability of individuals to bring suit against states of which they are not citizens in federal court. The text of the amendment prohibits federal courts from hearing certain lawsuits against states. The amendment was passed by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified by the states on February 7, 1795. It was the first Constitutional amendment adopted after the Bill of Rights.

The Eleventh Amendment was proposed in response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), where the Court held that federal courts could hear cases brought by private citizens against states and that states did not have sovereign immunity from such suits. The Eleventh Amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gives diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary to hear cases "between a state and citizens of another state."

The Eleventh Amendment has been interpreted to mean that state courts are not required to hear certain suits against the state if those suits are based on federal law. This interpretation was debated during the ratification of the Constitution, with Anti-Federalists fearing that Article III allowed individuals to sue states in federal court. The Eleventh Amendment was intended to bar cases like Vassall v. Massachusetts from proceeding in federal court, where a plaintiff sought to enforce the Treaty of Peace.

While the Eleventh Amendment provides broad sovereign immunity to states from suits, the Supreme Court has allowed suits against state officers in certain circumstances, such as when seeking to prevent future violations of federal law. The Court has also held that Congress can abrogate state sovereign immunity when using its authority under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Additionally, suits by other states and suits by the United States to enforce federal laws are permitted.

The Eleventh Amendment has been interpreted to apply to all federal suits against states brought by private parties, not just those involving citizens of other states or foreign citizens. It is an important part of the constitutional doctrines that shape the nature of judicial remedies against states and their officials for alleged violations of law.

Explore related products

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$76.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$242.25 $359

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (Aspen Treatise)

$117.28

The Eleventh Amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution

The Eleventh Amendment was passed by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified by the states on February 7, 1795. It was the first Constitutional amendment adopted after the Bill of Rights. The amendment was proposed following the Supreme Court's ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia, where the Court held that federal courts had the authority to hear cases brought by private citizens against states and that states did not have sovereign immunity from such suits.

The Eleventh Amendment's text prohibits federal courts from hearing certain lawsuits against states, specifically when a state is sued by an individual from another state or another country. This concept of protecting states from certain types of legal liability is known as "sovereign immunity." The amendment did not bar all lawsuits against states in federal courts. For example, it did not prevent suits against states when a matter of federal law was at issue or suits brought by a state's own citizens.

The Eleventh Amendment is an important part of a web of constitutional doctrines that shape the nature of judicial remedies against states and their officials for alleged violations of law. It added to the powers of the national government to regulate and tax individuals directly, rather than trying to compel the states to do so. The amendment also clarified that the Constitution prohibits "commandeering" of states, meaning federal laws cannot require states to regulate private persons.

The Eleventh Amendment was the first Constitutional amendment after the Bill of Rights

The Eleventh Amendment arose from the 1793 Supreme Court ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia, which held that federal courts could hear cases brought by private citizens against states and that states did not have sovereign immunity from such suits. The Eleventh Amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gives diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary to hear cases "between a state and citizens of another state". It states:

> The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

The Eleventh Amendment has been interpreted to mean that state courts do not have to hear certain suits against the state if those suits are based on federal law. It is an important part of a web of constitutional doctrines that shape the nature of judicial remedies against states and their officials for alleged violations of law.

The Amendment has been the subject of debate and interpretation over the years, with some arguing that it only applies to a specific set of circumstances, while others contend that it has broader implications.

Frequently asked questions