Core Principles Of Constitutions: Universal Commonalities

The constitution is a set of fundamental principles that define the rules and values according to which a nation is governed. While the specific contents of constitutions vary, they are all underpinned by a common set of principles, including equality, justice, majority rule, minority rights, consent of the governed, popular sovereignty, democracy, and republicanism. These principles are designed to protect the freedom and rights of citizens, promote self-governance, and maintain a healthy civil society.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Generative Principle of Political Constitutions: Studies on Sovereignty, Religion and Enlightenment

$33.45 $63.99

The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence: The Constitution of the United States of America

$9.99 $9.99

Introduction to Community Development: Theory, Practice, and Service-Learning

$112.85 $217

Navigating Community Development: Harnessing Comparative Advantages to Create Strategic Partnerships

$32.99 $32.99

Commentaries On the Constitution of the United States of America: With That Constitution Prefixed, in Which Are Unfolded, the Principles of Free ... Advantages of Republicanism Demonstrated

$21.75

Equality: All individuals are equally protected by the law

The principle of equality is a cornerstone of constitutional law, entailing that all individuals are equally protected by the law, regardless of their status, identity, or beliefs. This principle is derived from the understanding that all human beings inherently possess the same natural rights and, as such, should be treated equally under the law. Equality before the law is a fundamental concept in constitutional democracies, where the power of the government ultimately stems from the people.

The notion of equality is closely tied to the idea of justice, which entails that political and legal systems should be structured to protect the rights of all individuals equally. This means that laws should be applied impartially, without discrimination, and with due process for all. Due process ensures that the government's actions are bound by rules that apply equally to all citizens, preventing arbitrary or discriminatory treatment.

Equality also intersects with the concept of private property rights, which are considered natural rights of individuals to create, obtain, and control their possessions, beliefs, faculties, and opinions, as well as the fruits of their labor. In this context, equality implies that laws protecting private property should be uniformly applied, providing equal opportunity and security for all individuals to exercise this right.

Furthermore, equality is integral to the principle of majority rule with minority rights. While laws are typically enacted with the consent of the majority, equality demands that the inalienable rights of minorities are not infringed upon. This aspect of equality ensures that marginalized or underrepresented groups are afforded the same legal protections as the majority, fostering an inclusive and just society.

Ultimately, the principle of equality in constitutional law serves to safeguard the rights and freedoms of all individuals, regardless of their background or characteristics. It is a foundational concept that underpins the relationship between the people and their government, promoting fairness, justice, and the protection of fundamental human rights.

Due Process: Rules must apply equally to all

The Due Process Clause, as outlined in the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees that no state may deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without fair procedures. This clause ensures that all levels of American government must operate within the law and treat individuals fairly, regardless of race, colour, or citizenship.

The Due Process Clause does not govern how a state creates rules, such as those pertaining to student discipline in public high schools. However, it does govern how these rules are applied to individuals. For example, if a student is accused of cheating on a statewide examination, the Due Process Clause would ensure that the student receives a fair procedure, even if many students were involved.

The Supreme Court has held that this protection extends to all natural persons, including human beings, regardless of their characteristics. This interpretation has been applied in multiple cases, including Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) and Terrace v. Thompson (1923).

The Due Process Clause also applies to corporations, as seen in the 1877 Granger Cases, where the Court upheld various state laws without questioning whether a corporation could raise due process claims. Additionally, in Grosjean v. Am. Press Co. (1936), the Court held that a newspaper corporation was deprived of its liberty of the press, demonstrating that corporations can raise claims not based on property interests.

The exact procedures required to satisfy due process may vary depending on the circumstances and subject matter involved. However, the fundamental principle is that individuals are treated fairly and are not subjected to the arbitrary exercise of government power.

Separation of Powers: Branches limit each other's powers

The principle of separation of powers is a model that divides the government into separate branches, each of which has distinct and independent powers. The system typically divides the government into three branches: the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. This separation of powers is designed to ensure that no single branch becomes more powerful than another, creating a balance between the different powers of the state.

The concept of separation of powers can be traced back to the work of 17th-century English philosopher John Locke, who studied the English constitutional system and advocated for dividing political power into legislative, executive, and federative powers. Locke's ideas influenced the English general John Lambert, who wrote the Instrument of Government in 1653, proposing a tripartite system of separation of powers that briefly served as the constitution of England during the Protectorate.

The term "separation of powers" was later coined by 18th-century philosopher Montesquieu, who emphasized the importance of distinct sources of legitimization for each separate power. Montesquieu suggested that the executive power should be vested in a monarch, while legislative powers were better regulated by multiple bodies. This division of powers was designed to safeguard liberty and prevent the concentration of power in a single individual or entity.

In practice, the separation of powers is often accompanied by a system of checks and balances, where each branch of government has the ability to limit or check the power of the other branches. For example, in the United States federal government, Congress has the power to create laws, the President can veto those laws, and the Supreme Court may declare laws unconstitutional. Additionally, Congress can impeach and remove the President for high crimes, while the President has the power to appoint members to the Supreme Court. These checks and balances are intended to prevent any one branch from becoming dominant and to protect citizens from potential government abuses.

Explore related products

Toward Sustainable Communities: Solutions for Citizens and Their Governments-Fourth Edition

$15.99 $34.95

Principles of Presbyterian Polity

$20 $26

The Constitution of Liberty in the Open Economy (Routledge Foundations of the Market Economy)

$58.89 $61.99

The Comparative Constitutional Foundations of Private-Public Arbitration

$174.39 $210

U.S. History (1865-Present) & Constitutional Foundations

$12.94 $90

American Public Service: Constitutional and Ethical Foundations

$165.95

Checks and Balances: Powers distributed to prevent expansion of power

The system of checks and balances is a crucial feature of the US Constitution, designed to prevent any one branch of the government from becoming too powerful. This system is based on the idea of separation of powers, dividing the government into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has specific powers and responsibilities, and they are all subject to the rule of law.

The legislative branch, consisting of Congress, has the power to create laws and control funding for executive actions. It is considered the closest to the people and has the power to impeach members of the executive and judicial branches. Within the legislative branch, there is a further division into two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Both houses must pass a bill in the same form for it to become a law, and a two-thirds vote in both houses is required to override a presidential veto.

The executive branch is headed by the President, who serves as the commander-in-chief of the military. The President has the power to veto bills passed by Congress, make federal official nominations, and appoint members of the judiciary.

The judicial branch, represented by the Supreme Court, can check the other two branches by declaring laws unconstitutional. The President and the Senate, however, have a say in appointing and approving members of the Court, respectively.

This intricate system of checks and balances ensures that the branches of government have mechanisms to hold each other accountable and prevent the concentration of power in any one branch. It encourages a constant tension and conflict between the branches, which can be beneficial in maintaining a balance of power and preventing tyranny or corruption.

The checks and balances system is rooted in the philosophical and historical ideas of figures such as Polybius, Montesquieu, and Madison, who recognised the importance of dividing and balancing power to create a just and fair government.

Federalism: Balance of shared and separate powers between national and state governments

Federalism is a key principle of the US Constitution, outlining the balance of powers between the national and state governments. It is a defining feature of the country's political system, allowing for a unique blend of unity and diversity.

The US Constitution establishes a federal system of government, where powers are distributed between a central authority and regional authorities, in this case, the national government and the individual state governments. This distribution of powers ensures that certain powers are delegated to the national government, while others are retained by the states. The people retain all powers not explicitly granted to the governing bodies, and this is a crucial aspect of federalism.

The national government is responsible for issues that impact the entire nation, such as defence, foreign relations, interstate commerce, and currency. It also has the power to make laws that apply uniformly across the country, ensuring consistency in areas like civil rights and certain criminal laws. On the other hand, state governments handle matters that are more local in nature, such as education, healthcare, transportation, and law enforcement. They have the authority to create and enforce their own laws and policies, allowing for variation and flexibility to meet the specific needs of their citizens.

This division of powers promotes efficiency and responsiveness in governance. By sharing powers, both the national and state governments can work collaboratively to address the diverse needs and interests of the country's vast population. At the same time, the separation of powers prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful, protecting against tyranny and ensuring that decisions are made as close to the people as possible.

Federalism, as a principle, is essential for maintaining the delicate balance between unity and diversity in the US. It allows for a strong central government to address national concerns, while also empowering individual states to make decisions that reflect their unique populations and circumstances. This dynamic tension has been a defining characteristic of the country's political evolution and continues to shape the relationship between the national and state governments today.

Frequently asked questions