Farmers' Influence On The Constitution

The influence of farmers on the writing of the U.S. Constitution is a topic that has been widely discussed. The Federal Farmer, an Anti-Federalist, wrote a methodical assessment of the proposed Constitution, which was published as two pamphlets in 1787. These pamphlets, addressed to The Republican, likely New York state governor George Clinton, argued that the Constitution would lead to the consolidation of states into one national government, threatening American liberties. Leading Anti-Federalists like Patrick Henry and George Mason shared similar concerns, refusing to sign the final document. Today, farmers continue to shape policies like the Farm Bill, which impacts farming livelihoods, food growth, and sustainability. The Farm Bill, enacted during the 1930s as part of Roosevelt's New Deal, aimed to ensure fair food prices, adequate supply, and sustainable natural resources. It continues to be updated every five years, reflecting the input of farmers and advocates.

Explore related products

Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republican

$34.95

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The History of the Constitution: Notable Events for Young Readers

$4.99 $7.99

Who Stole America?

$33.5

Constitution and Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Session of the North Carolina Farmers' State Alliance: Held Near Hillsboro, N. C., August 9, 10, 11, 1898 (Classic Reprint)

$19.27

Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies

$0.99 $6.89

Farmers opposed the Constitution

Farmers played a significant role in shaping the United States Constitution, and their opposition to the initial draft of the document was instrumental in securing the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. During the drafting and ratification of the Constitution in the late 18th century, many farmers opposed it due to concerns about centralized power, individual liberties, economic policies, and representation.

Fear of Centralized Power

One of the primary concerns of farmers was the potential concentration of power in a strong central government. They feared that the Constitution would empower the federal government at the expense of state governments, infringing upon individual liberties. This fear was exacerbated by memories of the oppressive rule of the British monarchy, and farmers wanted to prevent a similar outcome.

Lack of a Bill of Rights

The absence of a Bill of Rights in the original Constitution was a significant point of contention for farmers. They believed that without explicit protections, their liberties could be at risk from a powerful central government. This concern led to their demand for amendments guaranteeing individual rights and limiting the power of the central government, which eventually resulted in the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791.

Economic Concerns

Farmers had legitimate economic worries about the impact of the Constitution. They were concerned about high taxes and national debt, especially as agricultural workers. The Constitution's focus on commercial interests over the agricultural sector, which was a significant part of the economy at the time, added to their anxieties. Farmers feared that a government dominated by wealthy merchants and industrialists would implement policies favoring their own interests, disproportionately affecting agricultural workers.

Representation

There was a pervasive belief among farmers that the new government would be controlled by wealthy elites, including merchants, landowners, and urban professionals, who supported the Constitution. Farmers feared that their interests, as everyday citizens, would be overlooked in favor of those of the wealthy classes. This concern about representation reflected a broader worry about potential government overreach and the protection of individual freedoms.

In conclusion, farmers' opposition to the Constitution was rooted in their desire to protect their rights and interests. Their fears of centralized power, economic policies favoring commercial interests, and representation dominated by wealthy elites united them under the Anti-Federalist movement. Through their advocacy for individual liberties and amendments to the Constitution, farmers played a pivotal role in shaping the foundation of American democracy and ensuring that the rights of all citizens were safeguarded.

Fear of centralized power

During the drafting and ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, many farmers in the United States opposed the new document due to fears of centralized power. This fear was rooted in the concern that the Constitution would create a strong central government that might overpower state governments and infringe on individual rights. Farmers had experienced the oppressive rule of the British monarchy and feared that a strong central government under the new Constitution could lead to a similar outcome. They believed that a strong central government would threaten their liberties and individual rights.

The Anti-Federalists, which included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers, favored strong state governments and a weak central government. They advocated for the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability of officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. The Federal Farmer, an Anti-Federalist who wrote a methodical assessment of the proposed Constitution, argued that the Constitution would tear down the sovereign states in favor of a consolidated government, and that this end of the federal system would be destructive of American liberties.

The fear of centralized power among farmers was also influenced by economic concerns. They worried about the potential for high taxes and national debt, as well as policies that might disproportionately affect agricultural workers. As agriculture was a significant part of the economy at the time, farmers believed that the new government would be dominated by wealthy merchants and industrialists, who would prioritize their own commercial interests over those of farmers and other working-class people. This belief was heightened by the economic crisis that followed the Revolutionary War, with rising taxes and continuing inflation impacting farmers' livelihoods.

The absence of a Bill of Rights in the original Constitution further exacerbated farmers' fears of centralized power. They believed that without guaranteed protections, their liberties could be at risk from the new government. States like Virginia and North Carolina refused to ratify the Constitution until assurances were given that a Bill of Rights would be added, demonstrating the importance of protecting individual rights and addressing potential government overreach. Shays' Rebellion, which occurred during this period, also highlighted the need for a stronger national government to maintain order and protect liberty.

In conclusion, farmers' fears of centralized power during the drafting and ratification of the U.S. Constitution were driven by concerns over individual liberties, economic impacts, and the potential for a strong central government to infringe on state governments. These fears influenced the political discourse and ultimately contributed to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights and a compromise between Federalists and Anti-Federalists in the final adoption of the Constitution.

Economic concerns

During the drafting and ratification of the U.S. Constitution in the late 18th century, many farmers opposed the new document due to a variety of economic concerns. One of the primary economic grievances of farmers was the prospect of high taxes and a national debt that could burden them unfairly. They were already facing economic hardships due to factors such as restricted trade with Great Britain, particularly the lucrative trade with the West Indies, resulting in a slump in exports. Additionally, continuing inflation rendered paper money virtually worthless, while taxes rose to pay off Revolutionary War debts.

In states like Massachusetts, merchants and shopkeepers demanded debt payments from western farmers, who were already struggling financially. The legislature also increased taxes to settle the state's wartime debt and meet Congress's tax requisitions. Farmers feared that a strong central government, dominated by wealthy merchants and industrialists, would prioritize commercial interests over the agricultural sector, implementing policies that disproportionately affected farmers. This concern was heightened by the absence of a Bill of Rights in the original Constitution, leaving farmers feeling vulnerable to government control and potential infringement on their liberties.

The economic crisis and the burden of taxes contributed to Shays' Rebellion, where farmers in western Massachusetts took up arms and marched on courthouses. This rebellion highlighted the need for a stronger national government to maintain order and protect liberties. It influenced the revision of the Articles of Confederation and shaped the debate around the new Constitution. Farmers' economic concerns persisted, and they wanted assurances that their rights would be protected, particularly regarding taxation and the potential for government overreach.

The economic concerns of farmers during the Constitution's ratification process reflected their fear of centralized power and the potential for economic policies that would disproportionately impact the agricultural sector. These concerns led to divisions between Federalists and Anti-Federalists, with the latter advocating for stronger state governments, direct elections, short term limits for officeholders, and the protection of individual liberties, including economic rights. The economic concerns of farmers played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of the early United States and contributed to the eventual adoption of the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

Constitution and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Session of the North Carolina Farmers' State Alliance: Held Near Hillsboro, N. C., August 8, 9, 10, 1899 (Classic Reprint)

$29.72 $23.97

Unintended Consequences of Constitutional Amendment

$92.95

A Third Letter to the People of Ireland, on the Subject of Tythes. Wherein the Farmers Complaints, and Other Objections Against Them, are Particularly Considered. By a Friend to the Constitution

$19.95

A Catechism of the History of New-Hampshire: From Its First Settlement to the Present Period

$30.95

Sowing the Wind: The Mississippi Constitutional Convention of 1890

$23.75 $35

Economic Analysis of Institutional Change in Ancient Greece: Politics, Taxation and Rational Behaviour (Routledge Explorations in Economic History)

$160.31 $200

Support for Anti-Federalists

The Anti-Federalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They were led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, an influential advocate for American independence from England. The Anti-Federalists believed that the new Constitution would give the federal government too much power, threatening the independence of the states and individual rights. They advocated for a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual liberties and stronger state representation. They were particularly concerned about the President's vast new powers, including the ability to overturn decisions of the people's representatives in the legislature through a veto.

The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. They demanded a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties, and the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified. The Anti-Federalists also brought to light fears of the excessive power of the national government at the expense of the state governments, and concerns that Congress might seize too many powers under the necessary and proper clause and other open-ended provisions.

The Anti-Federalists had more impact in some states than in others. While some states ratified the Constitution almost immediately, others, such as Rhode Island, strongly opposed it, with over 1,000 armed Anti-Federalists marching on Providence. Several states, including Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Virginia, and New York, agreed to ratify the Constitution only on the condition that it would be amended with a bill of rights. The Anti-Federalists played upon these fears and concerns in the ratification convention in Massachusetts, and a compromise, known as the "Massachusetts compromise", was reached.

The Anti-Federalists were less well-organized than the Federalists, but they had impressive leaders who were prominent in state politics. These leaders included political elites such as James Winthrop of Massachusetts, Melancton Smith of New York, and George Mason of Virginia. The Anti-Federalists shared a core view of American politics, particularly in their strength in the newer settled western regions of the country.

Influence on Shays' Rebellion

Shays' Rebellion, a violent insurrection in Massachusetts, took place in 1786 and 1787. It was led by Daniel Shays, a farmer and former soldier, and composed of mostly ex-Revolutionary War soldiers turned farmers. These farmers had received little compensation for their service in the war and were struggling economically in the 1780s. They were facing demands for immediate debt repayment from merchants and shopkeepers, high taxes, and a lack of cash in circulation.

The rebellion involved a series of attacks on courthouses and government properties in Massachusetts, with farmers taking direct action against debtors' courts. They blocked judges from entering courthouses in Northampton and Worcester, and shut down the court in Springfield. Shays and other leaders also planned to raid the federal arsenal in Springfield to obtain weapons, but the assault was anticipated, and shots were fired, killing and wounding several rebels. The farmers retreated, and Shays and other leaders fled to avoid prosecution.

Shays' Rebellion had a significant impact on the political landscape of the time. It highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the need for a stronger national government. The rebellion influenced the call for constitutional reform, leading to the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, which produced the United States Constitution. It contributed to the return of George Washington to public life and the creation of a stronger federal government capable of addressing economic issues and maintaining order.

The rebellion also brought to light the social and economic issues faced by farmers and the general populace in the post-Revolutionary War era. It prompted discussions about the role and power of the federal government and the protection of individual liberties, with some viewing it as a defence of their rights and liberty. Shays' Rebellion influenced the political discourse and the shaping of the early United States, contributing to the development of a stronger and more unified nation.

Frequently asked questions