The Constitution: A Revolutionary Risk For Colonists

The writing of the US Constitution was a highly contentious and risky endeavour. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 proposed a new constitution, establishing a much stronger national government, which was controversial and resisted by many. The colonists had recently overthrown a powerful central government, and the new Constitution risked tearing the young country apart. The delegates to the convention, representing a wide range of interests and views, had to compromise on many issues, including congressional representation and slavery. They were aware of the dangers of a constitutional system that could not resolve disputes between the central government and the states. The Federalists, who supported a strong central government, faced fierce opposition from the Anti-Federalists, who argued that the Constitution lacked a bill of rights and resembled the monarchy they had just overthrown. The ratification process was challenging, with bitter struggles in some states, and the outcome was uncertain until the end.

Explore related products

The American Revolution: A History (Modern Library Chronicles)

$12.56 $20

The American Revolution: A Concise History from Colonial Rebellion to the War for Independence to the Constitution

$14.99

A History Of The American Revolution

$16.69 $25.99

The History of the American Revolution: Notable Events for Young Readers

$4.69 $7.99

The American Revolution: A Visual History (DK Definitive Visual Histories)

$25.98 $45

American Revolutions: A Continental History, 1750-1804

$18.67 $21.99

The risk of collapse

The American Revolution was a constitutional controversy between Great Britain and the American colonists, with the colonists claiming that the British colonial policy was unconstitutional. This dispute was not just about bad law, but about the rights, liberties, and privileges of the colonists. The British constitution was unwritten, which meant that there were different understandings of its principles and terms. This led to a conflict between Great Britain and the colonies, with the colonists arguing for their natural rights and the British defending their policies. The controversy was a game of "chicken" on a titanic scale, with neither side backing down.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 proposed a new constitution that established a stronger national government. This was a controversial move, as it created a powerful central government that reminded some of the one they had just overthrown, and it lacked a bill of rights. The Anti-Federalists fought against the new Constitution, while the Federalists believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation's challenges. The debate over ratification was bitter, and the new Constitution was only ratified by the necessary number of states after a struggle.

The colonists were aware of the dangers of a constitutional system in which there was no way to resolve disputes between the center and the peripheries. They had witnessed the struggles between the general government and the states in America, and between the mother country and the colonies in the British context. The Continental Congress, which began as a coordinated effort to resist the British, became the central institution for managing the struggle for American independence. The Articles of Confederation, America's first attempt to govern itself as an independent nation, united the states as a loose league of states represented in a Congress. However, it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money, and the states’ disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the young country apart.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was tasked with revising the existing government, but they ended up creating a completely new one. The delegates, representing wildly different interests and views, crafted compromises to unite the states. They bypassed the state legislatures and called for special ratifying conventions in each state, with ratification by 9 of the 13 states enacting the new government. The Constitution stands today as one of the longest-lived and most emulated constitutions in the world.

The creation of a powerful central government

However, the Anti-Federalists vehemently opposed the creation of a powerful central government, fearing that it would mirror the oppressive regime they had recently overthrown. They wanted to limit the central government's powers and allow states to govern themselves in most matters. The Anti-Federalists also criticised the lack of a bill of rights in the proposed Constitution.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 represented diverse interests and views, and they had to craft compromises to bridge their differences. They agreed to bypass state legislatures for ratification, instead calling for special ratifying conventions in each state. They also addressed concerns about an overly powerful central government by establishing a system of separation of powers and checks and balances.

The final document, the US Constitution, was a compromise that allayed fears of a too-powerful central government while also strengthening the national government's authority. It resolved conflicts between small and large states, northern and southern states, and those who favoured a strong federal government versus those arguing for state sovereignty. The delegates' ability to forge a compromise that balanced centralised power with states' rights has contributed to the longevity and influence of the US Constitution.

The potential for anarchy

The American Revolution, which led to the creation of the United States Constitution, was a period of great uncertainty and potential for anarchy. The colonists had risen up against what they perceived as the ""unconstitutional"" policies of the British government, invoking arguments based on natural rights and natural law. This resulted in the independence of the 13 American colonies, which then had to unite under a new form of government.

The Articles of Confederation, America's first attempt at governing itself as an independent nation, united the states as a loose confederation with a congress that lacked enforcement powers, the ability to regulate commerce, or print money. This led to disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening to tear the young nation apart. The potential for anarchy was high, as the country was on the brink of collapse, and the need for a stronger central government was recognised.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 proposed a new constitution, establishing a much stronger national government. This provoked resistance from those who feared the concentration of power and reminded them of the monarchy they had just overthrown. The Federalists, who supported the new Constitution, believed that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order and stability, prevent anarchy, and face the nation's challenges. They argued that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate and that a new system of checks and balances was required.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the Constitution, fighting against it because it created a powerful central government. They preferred a weaker central government with more power vested in the states, and they wanted a bill of rights to protect individual liberties. The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was bitter and divisive, with each side campaigning hard for their vision of the country's future.

Explore related products

The American Revolution: An Intimate History

$55.99 $80

George vs. George: The American Revolution as Seen from Two Sides

$5.76 $6.95

This Fierce People: The Untold Story of America's Revolutionary War in the South

$15.96 $33

The American Revolution: An Enthralling Overview of the American Revolutionary War and Its Impact on the History of the United States of America (U.S. History)

$13.69

The True History of the American Revolution

$0.99 $8.99

The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition

$17.95 $27

The continuation of slavery

The colonists risked a great deal when they wrote the Constitution, including the continuation of slavery. The Constitution, which was signed on September 17, 1787, by 38 delegates, with an additional signature for the absent John Dickinson of Delaware, was an extraordinary achievement. However, it also contained compromises that perpetuated the institution of slavery.

Firstly, the Constitution included specific clauses that indirectly addressed slavery without using the words "slave" or "slavery." One such clause was the Three-Fifths Clause, which counted enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation, giving the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and additional votes in the Electoral College. This clause, while not explicitly mentioning slavery, provided a significant advantage to the Southern states, where slavery was prevalent.

Secondly, the Constitution included a ban on Congress ending the slave trade for 20 years, allowing the import and trade of enslaved people to continue until 1808. This concession was made to gain the support of southern delegates, who threatened to refuse to join the Union if slavery was restricted. The framers of the Constitution believed that this compromise was necessary to maintain unity and ensure a strong central government.

Thirdly, the Constitution included the Fugitive Slave Clause, which allowed slave owners to pursue and recapture escaped slaves. This clause further entrenched slavery by making it more difficult for enslaved people to gain their freedom and by empowering slave owners to enforce their "property rights."

Finally, the Constitution's silence on the morality of slavery and its failure to explicitly protect the rights of enslaved people contributed to the continuation of slavery. While some delegates to the Constitutional Convention, such as Luther Martin of Maryland and George Mason of Virginia, spoke out against slavery, the final document did not include any explicit condemnation of the practice. This silence, coupled with the inclusion of clauses that indirectly protected slavery, sent a message that slavery was acceptable and compatible with the nation's founding principles.

In conclusion, while the Constitution created a powerful central government and laid the foundation for future progress, it also made concessions to slavery to maintain unity and gain the support of southern states. These compromises ultimately delayed the abolition of slavery and contributed to the institution's endurance for several more decades until the passage of the 13th Amendment in 1865, which finally abolished slavery in the United States.

The threat of disunion

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 convened in Philadelphia with the daunting task of resolving these issues and forging a more perfect union. The delegates, representing diverse interests and views, engaged in passionate debates and compromises. One of the fiercest arguments centred on congressional representation, with delegates grappling over whether it should be based on population or divided equally among the states. The issue of slavery also threatened to derail the proceedings, and a temporary resolution was reached to continue the slave trade until 1808.

The colonists were keenly aware of the dangers of disunion, having recently fought for independence from Great Britain. They understood the importance of establishing a strong central government while also preserving the rights and liberties of the states. The Federalists, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, advocated for a robust central government to address the nation's challenges. They believed that a strong national authority was necessary to maintain order and stability and prevent the country from descending into anarchy.

However, the Anti-Federalists vehemently opposed the creation of a powerful central government, fearing it would mirror the monarchy they had just overthrown. They fought against the ratification of the Constitution, arguing for the preservation of state powers and the inclusion of a bill of rights. The ratification process was fraught with tension, and the Constitution was debated, criticized, and scrutinized clause by clause. The compromise of "vote now, amend later" played a pivotal role in securing victory in key states, ultimately leading to the enactment of the new government.

The colonists risked much in their endeavour to draft the Constitution, navigating a delicate balance between establishing a strong central government and preserving states' rights. Their efforts resulted in one of the longest-lived and most emulated constitutions in the world, setting a precedent for federalism and providing a framework for governing a unified nation.

Frequently asked questions