Fears That Shaped The Constitution

The authors of the US Constitution feared that their young country was on the brink of collapse. America's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. The states' disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the country apart. The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. They were wary of centralized power and loyal to their states, so they crafted a powerful central government that balanced the powers of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial.

Explore related products

Founding Fathers: The Essential Guide to the Men Who Made America

$14.77 $19.99

Founding Fathers

$19 $19.98

Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation

$8.92 $19

America's Founding Fathers (TV Series)

$2.99

America's Founding Fathers

$14.49 $18.8

America The Story of Us (TV Series)

$2.99

Fear of an overly centralised government

The authors of the US Constitution were wary of centralised power and loyal to their states. They were fearful of an overly centralised government imposing its will on the people of the states. The Anti-Federalists, in particular, opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

The Anti-Federalists fought hard against the Constitution because it created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown. They wanted a bill of rights to be included in the Constitution, ensuring individual liberties. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation's challenges. They asserted that the state governments had broad authority to regulate even personal and private matters, and that the US Constitution only granted the federal government powers that were positively granted to it, so a bill of rights was unnecessary.

The Anti-Federalists' fears were not unfounded. The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. This led to disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade that threatened to tear the young country apart. The authors of the Constitution aimed to address these issues by creating a powerful central government while also preserving the blessings of liberty for "We the People of the United States".

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 grappled with these competing interests and views, ultimately crafting a compromise that balanced the powers of three branches—executive, legislative, and judicial—and clearly defined the relationships among the states. This solution aimed to address the concerns of those who feared an overly centralised government, while also recognising the need for a stronger central authority to provide order and stability.

Fear of the country collapsing

The authors of the US Constitution, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, feared that their young country was on the brink of collapse. America's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, had given the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it lacked enforcement powers, the ability to regulate commerce, and the ability to print money. The states' disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the country apart.

The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution, feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, especially given the absence of a bill of rights. They believed that the Constitution created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown during the Revolutionary War. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation's challenges and prevent anarchy.

Alexander Hamilton played a crucial role in convincing Congress to organize a Grand Convention of state delegates to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention assembled in Philadelphia in May 1787, and the delegates grappled with finding a balance between state and national powers. They ultimately adopted a Constitution that balanced the powers of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. This solution maintained state power while also providing a strong central government to ensure the nation's survival.

The final draft of the Constitution was signed by 38 delegates on September 17, 1787, with an additional signature added later, bringing the total to 39. The ratification process was challenging, with Federalists and Anti-Federalists working to convince the states to accept or reject the Constitution, respectively. The Federalists, including Hamilton, successfully gained allies and achieved ratification, with nine of the required 13 states enacting the new government.

Fear of a powerful central government

The authors of the US Constitution were wary of centralized power and loyal to their states. They had witnessed the overreaching of the British government during the Revolutionary War, with the King's agents seizing property and breaking into the homes of citizens. This legacy kindled a hatred of arbitrary authority and a fear of a powerful central government imposing its will on the people.

The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution, feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. They believed that the Constitution created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown, and it lacked a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms. They wanted to maintain state power and prevent the concentration of power at the federal level.

The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation's challenges and provide order and stability. They argued that the existing government was on the verge of chaos, with a collapsing monetary system and a weak military. Alexander Hamilton, a key Federalist, proposed a system where senators and a national "governor" would be chosen by special electors and serve for life, while members of an assembly would be elected directly by citizens.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention understood the need to balance the powers of the central government. They crafted a Constitution that distributed power across three branches—executive, legislative, and judicial—and clearly defined the relationships among the states. This compromise helped allay fears of a powerful central government and ensured that the states retained certain powers.

The debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resulted in a compromise: "vote now, amend later." This compromise allowed for the ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that amendments would be made later to address concerns, including the addition of a bill of rights.

Explore related products

Founding Fathers: The Fight for Freedom and the Birth of American Liberty

$14.18 $40

Founding Fathers [DVD]

$8.57 $11.98

America's Hidden Stories (TV Series)

$2.99

Washington (TV Series)

$2.99

Founding Fathers: A Captivating Guide to Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and James Monroe (Historical Figures)

$20.95 $25.22

On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century

$7.31 $12

Fear of anarchy

The authors of the US Constitution had a strong fear of anarchy. This fear was a driving force behind the creation of the document. The country was on the brink of collapse, with states' disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatening to tear the young nation apart. The existing government was in chaos, with a collapsing monetary system and a dangerously weak military.

The fear of anarchy was particularly acute among wealthy individuals, who imagined hordes of vicious outlaws descending upon innocent citizens. This fear was expressed by George Washington, who wrote to Madison about the need to "rescue the political machine from the impending storm." Madison shared this concern and believed that a strong central government was the answer, providing order and stability.

The Anti-Federalists, however, feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. They opposed the ratification of the Constitution, advocating for a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation's challenges. This political division between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists shaped the debates around the Constitution and the formation of the new government.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention ultimately adopted a solution that balanced the powers of three branches—executive, legislative, and judicial. This compromise addressed the fear of anarchy by providing a strong central government while also maintaining a balance of powers to protect individual liberties. The Constitution was designed to empower the central government while preserving the blessings of liberty for "We the People of the United States."

Fear of federal meddling in the slave trade

The authors of the U.S. Constitution had fears about the federal government's involvement in the slave trade. They were aware that slavery was a significant part of the economy and society in the United States at the time. However, they also recognised that it was morally wrong and hoped that it would eventually die out. As a result, they avoided using the words "slave" or "slavery" in the Constitution, instead referring to slaves as "persons".

The Three-Fifths Clause is one example of how the Constitution protected slavery. This clause counted three-fifths of each state's slave population when apportioning representation, which gave the South more representation in the House of Representatives and more votes in the Electoral College. Additionally, the Constitution included a fugitive slave clause, which required the return of runaway slaves to their owners.

The authors of the Constitution also included a ban on Congress from ending the slave trade for 20 years. This was part of a compromise between the Northern and Southern states, with the Southern states agreeing to remove a clause restricting the national government's power to enact laws requiring goods to be shipped on American vessels. The authors of the Constitution believed that if they restricted the slave trade, South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union.

There was also a concern that the federal government would not have the power to regulate the slave trade effectively. Luther Martin of Maryland, a slaveholder himself, argued that the slave trade should be subject to federal regulation since the nation as a whole would be responsible for suppressing slave revolts. He also believed that the slave trade went against America's republican ideals and dishonoured the country's character.

Overall, the authors of the Constitution sought to balance their economic reliance on slavery with their moral qualms about the practice. They made concessions to protect slavery and the slave trade, but also laid the foundation for a powerful central government that would eventually have the ability to abolish slavery.

Frequently asked questions