Federalist Desires: Constitutional Compromises And Their Impact

The Federalists, who included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, wanted a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution. They believed that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. They also rejected the idea that a bill of rights was needed, arguing that any listing of rights could potentially be interpreted as exhaustive and that rights omitted could be considered as not retained. To advocate for their position, they published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers, known as The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pen name of Publius. Ultimately, the Federalists prevailed in state ratification debates, and their compromise with the Anti-Federalists led to the adoption of the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: The Federalist - Anti-Populist Papers

$24.37

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: Volume Two: The Populist - Anti-Federalist Papers

$32.12

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection

$1.99

The Presidency of James Monroe

$36.75 $54.99

The Imperial Republic: A Structural History of American Constitutionalism from the Colonial Era to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century (Routledge Revivals)

$34.95 $45.99

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

Federalist supporters

The Federalists were supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, which they believed would lead to a strong union. They were well-organised and included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They advocated for a strong central government, with weaker state governments, and the indirect election of government officials. They also supported longer term limits for officeholders and representative democracy.

Federalists believed that the new government would uphold the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. They also rejected the idea that a bill of rights was needed, arguing that any listing of rights could be interpreted as exhaustive and that rights not included could be considered as not retained. They further asserted that the people had delegated to the state all rights and powers which were not explicitly kept for themselves.

Alexander Hamilton was an influential Federalist who wrote many essays advocating for the ratification of the Constitution. James Madison and John Jay also contributed to a series of 85 powerful newspaper essays known as The Federalist Papers. These writings remain a vital source for understanding key provisions within the Constitution and their underlying principles.

The Federalist supporters wanted to avoid structural reforms within the new government and were against a second constitutional convention, which might have reversed provisions of the first. They supported Alexander Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies and an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause. They also favoured a more mercantile economy.

Ratification of the Constitution

The ratification of the US Constitution was a contentious process, with Federalist supporters of the document facing off against Anti-Federalist opponents. The Federalists, who included big property owners, conservative small farmers, businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, advocated for a strong central government and the adoption of the Constitution. They believed that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. They also favoured weaker state governments, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, feared that the Constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They worried that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Federalists were better organized and had strong support in the press. They published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers advocating for ratification of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote these essays under the pen name of Publius, and they came to be known as The Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalists also published a series of articles and delivered numerous speeches against ratification, known collectively as The Anti-Federalist Papers.

During the year-long debates over ratification, the Federalists ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates. The Constitution was sent to the states for ratification, and between December 1787 and January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut ratified the Constitution with only minor edits. The ratification of the Constitution, however, did not end the political divisions between Federalists and Anti-Federalists, which continued into the presidency of George Washington.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution and, at the urging of Anti-Federalists, the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. This spirit of compromise reflected genuine patriotism and suggested that the Americans were capable of self-government.

Federalist Party

The Federalist Party emerged from the supporters of Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies. The Federalists, as a whole, were better organized and connected. They were the supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and members of one of the nation's first two political parties. They included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They advocated for a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution, supporting a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy. They favored weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy.

Federalists defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. They believed that the Constitution, as the supreme law of the land, provided adequate protection of rights and freedoms, and that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous. They also rejected the idea that a bill of rights was needed to protect against oppressive acts of the federal government, arguing that the state constitutions already delegated to the state all rights and powers not explicitly granted to the federal government.

To combat the Federalist campaign, the Anti-Federalists published a series of articles and delivered numerous speeches against the ratification of the Constitution, citing concerns about too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties.

The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 powerful newspaper essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pen name of Publius, articulated the Federalists' position in favor of the adoption of the Constitution. The Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates illustrated the vigor of the rights to freedom of speech and press in the United States, even before the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were adopted. Ultimately, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution, but political divisions emerged during the presidency of George Washington over national fiscal policy.

Explore related products

The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 20: April 1791 to August 1791

$166.25 $175

The Federalist

$14.5

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Federalist Papers (Signet Classics)

$7.23 $8.95

The Federalist Papers: Large Print Unabridged 1787 Original Version

$27.99

The Federalist Papers, Extended Edition: An Essential Collection of The Original, Unabridged Text (1787–88) With Detailed Commentary on Each Essay to Guide you Through America's Founding Ideas

$24.95

Federalist Papers

The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays published in New York newspapers written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pen name of Publius. The first of these Federalist essays was published in a New York newspaper, under the pseudonym Publius, on October 27, 1787. They advocated for the ratification of the US Constitution, arguing for a strong central government, and against the Anti-Federalists, who sought to protect states' rights and individual liberties.

The Federalists, who included big property owners, conservative small farmers, businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, believed in weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy. They supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

The Federalist Papers were a response to the Anti-Federalists, who wrote and spoke out against the ratification of the Constitution, arguing that it would give too much power to the central government and threaten individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Federalist Papers were successful in advocating for the adoption of the Constitution, which was ratified by nine or more state conventions in 1788. However, the political divisions between Federalists and Anti-Federalists continued, particularly over fiscal policy during the presidency of George Washington. Despite these ongoing divisions, the Federalist Papers remain a vital source for understanding the key provisions and underlying principles of the US Constitution.

Anti-Federalists

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution, fearing that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. They wanted to preserve the autonomy of the state against federal encroachments and sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists wrote and delivered numerous speeches against the ratification of the Constitution, which have come to be known as The Anti-Federalist Papers. Their opposition was an important force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. The political split between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists began in the summer of 1787 when 55 delegates attended the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia to draw up a new plan of government.

In 1788, debates over the ratification of the Constitution took place across the country, with both sides holding meetings and marches that sometimes became violent. In July 1788, a group of Anti-Federalists in Albany, New York, stopped a group of Federalists from marching through the town, leading to a violent clash. Despite their efforts, New York became the eleventh state to ratify the Constitution on July 26, 1788, although the Anti-Federalists managed to attach a list of proposed additions that had to be considered before the state would fully participate in the new government.

Although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution, this harmony did not extend into the presidency of George Washington. Political divisions emerged in 1792 over fiscal policy, with those who supported Alexander Hamilton's aggressive policies and expansive constitutional interpretations forming the Federalist Party, while those who opposed him, including some former Federalists, formed the Democratic-Republican Party.

Frequently asked questions