England's Response To The Constitution

The UK's constitution is unique in that its core aspects are not contained in a single legal source. Unlike the US, the UK does not have a written constitution in the traditional sense, instead, it is a compilation of traditions and court rulings that together establish a working constitution. The UK's constitution traces back to before the four nations of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland were fully formed. The UK's constitution is based on the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, which means that an Act of Parliament is the highest form of law. This principle has been central to the British constitution since the Magna Carta in 1215, which limited the king's power and asserted the notion that the monarch is not above the law. Over time, the UK's constitution has evolved through key Acts of Parliament, such as the Acts of Union between Wales and England in 1536/1543, and the Treaty and Acts of Union of 1706-1707 between Scotland and England. The UK's unique constitutional structure has led to debates about the role of international law and the potential adoption of a monist or dualist theory.

Explore related products

The Words That Made Us: America's Constitutional Conversation, 1760-1840

$22.76 $40

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$31.99 $39.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

American Constitutional History: A Brief Introduction

$36.95 $36.95

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

The UK constitution is a compendium of traditions and rulings, not a single document

The UK's constitution is unique in that it is not contained within a single document. Instead, it is a collection of traditions, rulings, and historical documents that have evolved over time. This sets it apart from other countries, such as the United States, where the constitution is considered the 'supreme law'. The UK's unwritten constitution is a result of its distinct historical context, lacking a revolutionary moment in the 18th or 19th centuries, when written constitutions gained popularity.

The UK constitution's core principles are based on parliamentary sovereignty, which asserts that an Act of Parliament is the highest form of law. This sovereignty was established through power struggles between the monarch, the church, the courts, and the people. The Magna Carta of 1215, for instance, limited the king's power and asserted the notion that the monarch is subject to the law.

Over time, various Acts of Parliament have contributed to the evolution of the UK constitution. The Acts of Union between Wales and England in 1536/1543 legally incorporated Wales into England. The Act of Settlement in 1701 prevented Catholics from ascending to the English throne and further solidified Parliament's power. The Treaty and Acts of Union of 1706-1707 united Scotland and England under a single legislature, the Parliament of Great Britain.

The UK constitution also encompasses rulings that have shaped the country's political landscape. The jurist Edward Coke's ruling in Dr. Bonham's Case in 1610 established the concept of judicial power to overrule government acts. The views of legal scholars like Albert Venn Dicey and political journalists like Walter Bagehot have also influenced the understanding of parliamentary sovereignty and the operation of a constitutional monarchy.

While the UK constitution lacks a single document, it is a dynamic and evolving compilation of traditions and rulings. This unique characteristic has shaped the country's political and legal landscape, contributing to the distinct features of the UK's system of governance.

The UK constitution is different from other countries' constitutions

The UK's constitution is unique when compared to other countries' constitutions. Unlike many other nations, the UK's constitution does not stem from a single legal source or document. Instead, it is a collection of traditions, court rulings, and statutes that have evolved over time. This lack of a centralised legal source is partly due to the UK's history, as it did not experience a revolution or political rupture during the late eighteenth or nineteenth centuries, when written constitutions were gaining popularity after the American Revolutionary War.

The UK constitution is also distinct in its lack of a "higher law" concept. Unlike the United States, where the constitution is considered the supreme law, the UK does not have a clear distinction between constitutional and regular laws. This means there are no special procedures for amending the constitution; a constitutional statute can be changed by a simple majority vote in Parliament, just like any other legislation.

The UK's unwritten constitution is based on the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, which holds that Parliament has sovereign power over the government, rather than the people or the monarch. This principle has evolved over time through power struggles between the monarch, the church, the courts, and the people. The Magna Carta of 1215, for instance, limited the king's power and asserted the notion that the monarch is subject to the law.

Another unique aspect of the UK constitution is the role of the judiciary. While the lower British courts, including the Supreme Court, are not constitutionally equal to the other branches of government, the country has a long history of judicial review, dating back to the ruling in Dr. Bonham's Case in 1610 by the jurist Edward Coke. This has led to debates about the extent of judicial power and its potential distortion of the constitutional hierarchy.

Finally, the UK's approach to international law sets it apart from other countries. While the UK has been a strong supporter of international organisations and a founding member of several bodies upholding universal rights, there is a debate about whether international law should be directly applicable in the UK (a "monist" theory) or if it should be translated into domestic law ("dualist" theory). This debate reflects the complex nature of the UK's constitution and its ongoing evolution.

Parliamentary sovereignty is a central element of the British constitution

The United Kingdom's constitution is distinct from those of many other countries in that its core aspects are not contained within a single legal source. Unlike the United States, for example, the UK does not have a written constitution in the traditional sense. Instead, it is a vast collection of traditions and court rulings that collectively constitute a working constitution. This unique characteristic of the UK's constitution can be attributed to its historical context. The UK did not undergo a revolution or political rupture during the late eighteenth or nineteenth centuries, when written constitutions gained widespread popularity following the American Revolutionary War.

Parliamentary sovereignty is often regarded as a fundamental component of the British constitution. This concept holds that Parliament possesses sovereign power, or ultimate authority and control over the government, rather than the people, as seen in the United States. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty has been significantly influenced by legal scholars such as Albert Venn Dicey and political journalists like Walter Bagehot. While knowledge of their works has diminished over time, their ideas continue to shape the British constitution.

The history of the British constitution extends far beyond the formal beginning in 1800. One of the earliest recorded laws in the UK is the Magna Carta, which dates back to 1215. This document played a pivotal role in limiting the king's power over his subjects and establishing the notion that the monarch is subject to the constraints of the law. The Magna Carta also recognised the right of Parliament to exist for "common counsel" before any taxation, challenging the "divine right of kings" doctrine.

Over time, the British constitution has undergone significant transformations. The Act of Settlement in 1701, for instance, prevented Catholics from ascending to the English throne and affirmed Parliament's authority to determine the line of succession. The Act of Supremacy in 1534 marked another important milestone, with King Henry VIII asserting his divine right over the Catholic Church and proclaiming himself the supreme leader of the Church of England.

While parliamentary sovereignty is a key feature of the British constitution, its extent is a subject of ongoing debate. Parliamentary sovereignty implies that an Act of Parliament holds the highest legal authority, but it also suggests that "Parliament cannot bind itself". This principle has been challenged in light of the UK's membership in international organisations and the potential conflict between domestic and international law. The UK's support for organisations formed under international law, such as the United Nations, has raised questions about the primacy of parliamentary sovereignty in relation to international legal principles.

Explore related products

Select Charters of English Constitutional History: From Earliest Times to Edward the First

$36.03

The Constitutional History of England

$1.99 $44.9

Documents of American Constitutional and Legal History (Documents of American Constitutional & Legal History)

$55 $108

English History: An Enthralling Story of England, from Ancient Times through the Medieval Period and the Tudors to the Dawn of the Modern Age (Exploring the Past)

$25.58 $19.46

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference)

$17.01 $22

The UK constitution has no concept of a 'higher law'

The UK's constitution is distinct from those of many other countries in that its core aspects are not contained in a single legal source. Unlike France, Italy, and several other nations, the UK did not experience a revolution or political rupture in the late eighteenth or nineteenth century, when written constitutions were most popular following the American Revolutionary War. The UK constitution is unwritten and is instead a vast compendium of traditions and court rulings that collectively constitute a working constitution.

The UK system, unlike that of the United States, has no clear concept of a 'higher law'. There is no distinction between constitutional law and regular law, and no special procedures for amending the constitution. A 'constitutional statute' can be repealed or amended by a simple majority vote in Parliament, just like any other legislation. This is because parliamentary sovereignty is a fundamental element of the British constitution, meaning that an Act of Parliament is the highest form of law. However, this also means that "Parliament cannot bind itself".

The UK constitution's history can be traced back to before the four nations of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland were fully formed. Following the Norman Conquest of 1066, William the Conqueror summoned nobles learned in the law from across the country to learn the established laws and customs. The Magna Carta of 1215, which arose from the conflict leading to the First Barons' War, granted Parliament the right to exist for "common counsel" before any tax, challenging the divine right of kings to rule. The Magna Carta is considered a significant point in the history of constitutional law, as it placed formal limits on the King's power and articulated the notion that the monarch should be subject to the law.

Over time, the UK constitution has undergone several key reforms. The Act of Supremacy of 1534, for instance, saw King Henry VIII declare himself the supreme leader of the Church of England, asserting his divine right over the Catholic Church in Rome. The Acts of Union of 1706-1707 united England and Scotland into a single legislature, the Parliament of Great Britain, following the Treaty of Union. The Act of Settlement of 1701 prevented Catholics from ascending to the English throne and established Parliament's right to decide on the line of succession, further enhancing its power.

The UK constitution is influenced by international law

The UK's constitution is unique in that it is not contained in a single legal source. Unlike countries like the United States, the UK has no written or codified constitution. This means there is no clear distinction between constitutional law and regular law, and constitutional statutes can be changed by a simple majority vote in Parliament. This has resulted in a flexible system that can be altered by the government of the day and is influenced by various sources, including international law.

The UK's constitution is influenced by international law in several ways. Firstly, the UK has accepted that its sovereignty would not be used unlawfully, and it has cooperated with international organisations and agreements, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, the United Nations, and the International Labour Organization. Secondly, the UK has a long history of supporting organisations formed under international law, such as the League of Nations and the United Nations, to uphold human rights and international peace and security. Thirdly, while the UK has not always followed international law to the letter, it has been influenced by it in shaping its own laws and policies, such as in the Human Rights Act 1998, which required the judiciary to apply human rights norms directly in British cases.

The influence of international law on the UK's constitution can also be seen in the development of constitutional principles. For example, the Magna Carta, a foundational constitutional principle, inspired the notion of the rule of law, which is a fundamental principle of modern legal systems, including the UK's. The rule of law, as defined by Lord Bingham of Cornhill, includes the protection of fundamental human rights and working according to international law. This indicates that international law has shaped the UK's understanding of key constitutional principles.

Additionally, the UK's membership in the European Union (EU) has influenced the constitution. The UK joined the EU in 1973 and left in 2020, and during this time, EU law took precedence over UK law in certain areas. This dynamic between international law and domestic law has been a subject of debate in the UK, with some arguing for a "monist" theory, where international law is adopted directly, and others preferring a "dualist" theory, where international law principles are translated into domestic law.

In conclusion, the UK's constitution is influenced by international law in several ways. The UK has cooperated with international organisations, supported international agreements and laws, and integrated international principles into its own constitutional framework. The dynamic between international law and the UK's constitution is complex and has evolved over time, reflecting the UK's unique constitutional history and its engagement with the international community.

Frequently asked questions