Executive Order 9066: Constitutionality Of Japanese Internment

Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to relocation centers further inland, resulting in the incarceration of Japanese Americans. This order, issued during World War II, raised significant constitutional issues regarding civil liberties and the right to due process, with critics arguing that it endorsed racism and failed to uphold the rights guaranteed under the Constitution, particularly the Fifth Amendment's Due Process clause.

Explore related products

Impounded: Dorothea Lange and the Censored Images of Japanese American Internment

$18.05 $19.95

Colors of Confinement: Rare Kodachrome Photographs of Japanese American Incarceration in World War II (Documentary Arts and Culture, Published in ... for Documentary Studies at Duke University)

$9.99 $19.99

Study Guide: Executive Order 9066 by Franklin Delano Roosevelt (SuperSummary)

$3.95 $8.95

Gale Researcher Guide for: Literature after Executive Order 9066

$6.99

The Executive Order: A Novel

$14.99 $16.02

Legal Guide for Police

$35.56 $56.99

The right to due process

Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to "relocation centers" further inland. This order specifically impacted Japanese Americans, with two-thirds of the 125,000 people displaced being U.S. citizens.

The constitutional issues stemming from this executive order revolved around civil liberties, particularly the right to due process. The Supreme Court initially upheld the internment in the Hirabayashi and Korematsu cases, citing military necessity. However, these rulings have been widely criticized for violating the constitutional rights guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

The Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1980, conducted an official study of Executive Order 9066 and its effects. The Commission's findings, published in 1982, concluded that the internment was driven by racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership. This was further evidenced by a US Navy report, which stated that Japanese Americans did not pose a threat to the US government, contradicting the premise of the executive order.

In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, formally apologizing for the internment and providing reparations to surviving internees. This act acknowledged the violation of the constitutional right to due process, as individuals of Japanese descent were targeted based solely on their race and ethnicity.

In summary, Executive Order 9066 raised significant constitutional concerns regarding the right to due process, as it resulted in the internment of Japanese Americans without charges or evidence of disloyalty, solely based on their race and ethnicity. The subsequent criticism, official apologies, and reparations acknowledged the injustice and violation of constitutional rights caused by the executive order.

Racial discrimination

Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to "relocation centers" further inland. This order specifically impacted Japanese Americans, resulting in the incarceration of approximately 110,000-125,000 people, two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens.

While the executive order did not mention any specific group or location, it was swiftly applied to the entire Japanese American population on the West Coast. This was due to the proximity of large Japanese American communities to vital war assets along the Pacific Coast, as well as heightened suspicions following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. The entire West Coast was deemed a military area, and Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt issued orders specifying "all people of Japanese ancestry" for removal.

The constitutional issues raised by Executive Order 9066 centred on civil liberties and racial discrimination. The Supreme Court initially upheld the internment in the Hirabayashi and Korematsu cases, citing military necessity. However, these rulings have been widely criticized for violating constitutional rights and endorsing racism, particularly the Fifth Amendment's Due Process clause.

In 1982, the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC) concluded that the internment was driven by racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership. This was supported by evidence discovered in 1983, which showed that Japanese Americans did not pose a significant threat to the US government. As a result, in 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, formally apologizing for the internment and providing reparations to surviving internees. This acknowledged the wrongful imprisonment based solely on race and recognized it as a grave injustice against Japanese Americans during World War II.

False pretense

Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to "relocation centers" further inland. This order specifically impacted Japanese Americans, with approximately 110,000-125,000 people, two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens, being displaced and interned.

The constitutional issues stemming from Executive Order 9066 revolved around civil liberties and racial discrimination. While the order itself did not specify any particular ethnic group, in practice, it was applied almost exclusively to Japanese Americans. This was due to the perception of Japanese Americans as a threat to national security following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941.

The Supreme Court initially upheld the internment in the Hirabayashi and Korematsu cases, citing military necessity. However, these rulings have been widely criticized for violating constitutional rights, particularly the Fifth Amendment's Due Process clause, and for endorsing racism. In 1982, the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC) concluded that the internment was driven by racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership. This was supported by evidence discovered in 1983, which showed that the U.S. Navy had reported that Japanese Americans did not pose a threat to the U.S. government, indicating that the order was based on the false pretense of Japanese Americans being "enemy aliens."

In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, formally apologizing for the internment and providing reparations to surviving internees. This act acknowledged that the imprisonment was based solely on race and recognized it as a grave injustice against American citizens of Japanese descent.

Explore related products

Legal Guide for Police: Constitutional Issues

$31.85 $54.95

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

CrunchTime for Contstitutional Law (Emanuel CrunchTime Series)

$33 $59.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$241.98 $359

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Violation of civil liberties

Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to "relocation centers" further inland, resulting in the incarceration of Japanese Americans. This order, issued during World War II, was based on the false premise that Japanese Americans were "enemy aliens" and posed a threat to national security following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941.

The constitutional issues stemming from Executive Order 9066 revolved around civil liberties, particularly the right to due process guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. The Supreme Court initially upheld the internment in the Hirabayashi and Korematsu cases, citing military necessity. However, these rulings have been widely criticized for violating the constitutional rights of Japanese Americans based on racial prejudice. Fred Korematsu, a young man who refused to comply with the order, was arrested and challenged the constitutionality of the order in court, but his case was unsuccessful.

The Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, established in 1980, later recognized the internment as a result of racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership. In 1982, the Commission published a report stating that the internment was driven by these factors and that Japanese Americans did not pose a threat to the US government. This conclusion was supported by crucial evidence discovered in 1983, which showed that the passage of Executive Order 9066 was based on the false premise of Japanese Americans being "enemy aliens."

In response to the Commission's findings, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act in 1988, which formally apologized for the internment and provided reparations to surviving internees. This act acknowledged the wrongful imprisonment based solely on race and recognized it as a grave injustice against American citizens of Japanese descent. The scale and nature of the internment of Japanese Americans were also distinctively harsher than that of German and Italian Americans, who were interned during the same period but based on their status as enemy aliens rather than solely on ethnicity.

The constitutional issues raised by Executive Order 9066 and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II involved complex legal and ethical considerations. The violation of civil liberties, including the right to due process, and the endorsement of racial discrimination in the name of national security, were significant and contested aspects of this executive order.

Failure of political leadership

Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to "relocation centers" further inland, resulting in the incarceration of Japanese Americans. This order was issued in the context of World War II, specifically the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, which heightened suspicions around individuals of Japanese descent and fueled fears about national security, especially on the West Coast.

The failure of political leadership in relation to Executive Order 9066 can be examined through several aspects:

Lack of Political Will to Protect Civil Liberties

Executive Order 9066 raised significant constitutional issues regarding civil liberties, particularly the right to due process guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment. The order authorized the removal of individuals based on vague criteria of being a "threat to national security," and it was applied disproportionately to Japanese Americans, with two-thirds of the 125,000 people displaced being U.S. citizens. Political leaders failed to intervene and protect the constitutional rights of these citizens, despite the clear infringement on their liberties.

Racial Discrimination and Prejudice

The enforcement of Executive Order 9066 was driven by racial prejudice and discrimination against individuals of Japanese descent. Despite evidence indicating that Japanese Americans did not pose a significant threat, as revealed in Lieutenant Commander K.D. Ringle's report, political leaders failed to act on this information and continued to uphold the order. The result was the targeted incarceration of Japanese Americans based solely on their ethnicity, with over 110,000 individuals spending the remainder of the war in internment camps.

Inadequate Legislative Oversight and Scrutiny

The passage of Executive Order 9066 highlights a failure of political leadership in conducting adequate legislative oversight. Public Law 77-50, which provided for the enforcement of the executive order, was approved with minimal discussion in the Senate and House, demonstrating a lack of thorough scrutiny by political leaders. This lack of oversight contributed to the passage of legislation that enabled the infringement of civil liberties and targeted incarceration of a specific ethnic group.

Political Capitulation to War Hysteria

The political leadership of the time failed to act as a check against the war hysteria and public sentiment fueled by the attack on Pearl Harbor. Instead of calming fears and ensuring a measured response, political leaders capitulated to the prevailing atmosphere, resulting in the issuance of Executive Order 9066. This failure to provide calm and rational leadership led to the unjust targeting and incarceration of Japanese Americans.

In conclusion, the failure of political leadership in relation to Executive Order 9066 encompassed multiple dimensions, including the neglect of civil liberties, racial discrimination, inadequate legislative oversight, and capitulation to war hysteria. The consequences of these failures were profound, resulting in the unjust incarceration of over 100,000 individuals of Japanese descent and the violation of their constitutional rights.

Frequently asked questions