Understanding California's Necessity Defense For Felony Shoplifting

what constitutes a necessity defense for felony shoplifting in california

Shoplifting is a common theft crime in California, with the state recording billions of dollars in losses annually. In California, shoplifting is a wobbler offense, meaning it can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. If convicted of felony shoplifting, one may face up to three years in state prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000. However, there are certain defenses that can be used to avoid a conviction. This article will explore the topic of what constitutes a necessity defense for felony shoplifting in California, including the specific criteria that must be met for a successful defense.

Characteristics Values
Shoplifting defined as felony or misdemeanor If the value of the stolen property is $950 or less, it is a misdemeanor. Above $950, it is a felony.
Penalty for felony shoplifting Up to three years in state prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000
Penalty for misdemeanor shoplifting Up to six months in county jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000
Defenses for shoplifting Lack of intent, mistaken identity, contesting merchandise value, proving a legitimate reason for handling items without intent to steal, arguing that intent to steal was formed after entering the store, or raising a mistake defense
Alternative to jail time Probation for up to two years, diversion programs, civil compromise

cycivic

Shoplifting is a wobbler crime in California, meaning it can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony

Shoplifting is a "wobbler" crime in California, meaning it can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. If convicted of a misdemeanor act of shoplifting, the penalty may be six months in a county jail, a $1,000 fine, or both. However, if convicted of a felony, the penalty for a first offense may be up to three years in state prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000. A felony violation of shoplifting is punishable under California's "Three Strikes" system, meaning that if an individual receives three "strikes" on their record, they will serve a minimum of 25 years in state prison.

The crime of shoplifting is defined under California Penal Code 459.5 PC as entering a commercial establishment with the intent to commit larceny during regular business hours, with the value of the property taken or intended to be taken being $950 or less. Any entry into a commercial business with the intent to commit larceny that does not meet these criteria is considered burglary.

In order to be convicted of shoplifting under CPC §459.5(a), an individual must enter a commercial establishment during business hours with the intent to commit theft. The specific criminal intent to steal items from a store prior to entry is a key element that needs to be proven in a shoplifting case. While not technically defenses, there are alternative methods to resolve a shoplifting case without ending up with a criminal conviction, such as diversion programs or civil compromises.

Prior to Proposition 47 in 2014, shoplifting could be charged as Penal Code 459 burglary with felony penalties. However, now, shoplifting is typically charged as a misdemeanor under PC 459.5. If an individual is accused of stealing or attempting to steal items valued at more than $950, they can be charged with Penal Code 487 PC grand theft, which can be a felony. Additionally, felony charges may apply if the defendant has a prior conviction for certain crimes, such as a sex crime that requires registration as a sex offender.

cycivic

Felony shoplifting charges can be brought if the value of the stolen goods exceeds $950

Shoplifting is a serious offense in California, and the state considers it a "wobbler" crime, meaning it can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. The value of the stolen goods is a key factor in determining whether felony charges can be brought.

In California, shoplifting is defined under Penal Code 459.5 PC, which states that shoplifting is entering a commercial establishment with the intent to commit larceny during business hours, with the stolen property valued at $950 or less. If the value of the stolen goods exceeds $950, individuals can be charged with Penal Code 487 PC grand theft, which is a felony.

Felony shoplifting charges can result in significant penalties. A first offense may carry up to three years in state prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000. Additionally, California's "Three Strikes" system means that if an individual receives three "strikes" on their record, they will serve a minimum of 25 years in state prison.

It is important to note that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual intended to commit theft when they entered the establishment. Defenses against shoplifting charges can include lack of intent, mistaken identity, contesting merchandise value, or proving a legitimate reason for handling items without the intent to steal.

Recent updates to California's shoplifting laws, such as Proposition 47 (2014), have reclassified certain nonviolent crimes, including shoplifting under $950, from felonies to misdemeanors. This shift prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. However, Assembly Bill 1700 aims to enhance penalties for habitual offenders, allowing felony charges for repeated theft-related convictions.

cycivic

Prior convictions can result in felony charges

Shoplifting is typically a misdemeanor in California, but it can escalate to a felony under certain circumstances. If convicted, this escalation can lead to severe legal consequences, including several years of imprisonment.

Shoplifting can be filed as a felony crime under certain circumstances, such as when an individual has prior convictions for certain crimes. Under Proposition 36, a third-time theft crime can be charged as a felony punishable by 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in jail. The prior two convictions can include petty theft, shoplifting, burglary, robbery, or carjacking. The decision to file felony shoplifting charges is made by the district attorney, particularly when there is a prior conviction for serious offenses such as murder or attempted murder.

Other prior convictions that can result in felony shoplifting charges include sex crimes requiring sex offender registration, any offense against a child under 14, any violent sex crime involving force or threats, and any serious or violent felony punishable by life imprisonment or death. Additionally, if the offender has a serious criminal record, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior, they may face felony charges. This includes individuals with multiple theft convictions or violent crimes on their records.

Furthermore, the value of the stolen property can also be a factor in determining felony charges. If the stolen property is worth more than $950, it can be charged as grand theft, which carries harsher penalties, including up to three years in county jail. The intent to steal property valued at over $950 can also elevate the offense to a felony.

It is important to note that shoplifting is a "wobbler" crime in California, meaning it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the circumstances and the offender's prior convictions. If convicted of a felony, the penalty for a first offense can be up to three years in state prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000.

cycivic

Lack of intent is a possible defense

Shoplifting is considered a serious offense in California, and the associated penalties can be severe. California operates under the Three Strikes law, which includes shoplifting. This means that a defendant with two or more previous "strikes" or convictions will face a minimum of 25 years in prison. Given the severity of the penalties, it is important to understand your defense options if facing shoplifting charges.

One possible defense is a lack of intent. To be convicted of shoplifting under California Penal Code Section 459.5, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual intended to commit theft when they entered a commercial establishment during business hours. If an individual did not intend to steal at all or did not form the intent to steal until after entering the establishment, they may be able to avoid shoplifting charges and instead face charges for petty theft or a reduced charge.

The specific criminal intent to steal must be formed prior to entering the store, and this is often the key element that needs to be proven in a shoplifting case. Prosecutors will examine every fact and circumstance to establish this intent. However, it can be challenging to prove what an accused person was thinking at the time of the incident. While certain actions within the store may indicate an intent to steal, a defense attorney may argue that the intent to steal was formed after entering the business.

Additionally, there are other ways to resolve a shoplifting case without a criminal conviction. These include diversion programs and civil compromises. Diversion programs involve agreeing to conditions set by the court, such as community service or restitution, and successful completion can result in the dismissal of charges without a criminal record. Civil compromises, on the other hand, are agreements between the shoplifter and the business where the shoplifter repays the costs incurred due to theft, and the business agrees not to prosecute.

While lack of intent can be a possible defense, it is important to note that shoplifting is a "`wobbler`" offense in California, meaning it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances. Felony charges may apply if the defendant has prior convictions for certain types of crimes, such as violent offenses or sex offenses. The value of the stolen items also plays a role, as theft of items valued at more than $950 can be charged as grand theft, which carries more severe penalties.

cycivic

Mistake defence can be raised if the defendant forgot to pay for an item

In California, shoplifting is defined under Penal Code 459.5 PC as entering a commercial establishment with the intent to commit larceny during regular business hours, with the value of the property taken or intended to be taken being $950 or less.

Shoplifting is typically a misdemeanor offence, punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine. However, a third-time theft offence can be a felony carrying up to three years of incarceration.

Mistake-of-fact is a defence that can be used in shoplifting cases where the defendant simply forgot to pay for an item when they left the store. This is a common occurrence when shoppers are distracted or preoccupied. If it can be shown that the failure to pay was an innocent accident, then criminal charges cannot stand.

In California, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had the intent to steal. This is often the key element that needs to be proven in a shoplifting case. The defence of mistake-of-fact can be used to show that the defendant did not have the required intent to steal, as they simply forgot to pay for the item in question.

Additionally, there are other ways to resolve a shoplifting case without a criminal conviction. These include diversion programs, where the defendant agrees to conditions set by the court, such as community service or restitution. If the defendant successfully completes these conditions, the case may be dismissed without a criminal record.

While the defence of mistake-of-fact can be effective in certain cases, it is important to note that it may still result in a conviction for petty theft. It is always advisable to consult with a skilled criminal defence attorney in California to understand the specific laws and potential defences available.

Frequently asked questions

Shoplifting is normally a misdemeanor offense in California. However, it can be considered a felony when the individual has prior convictions for shoplifting, or when the stolen items are valued at over $950.

Felony shoplifting in California may result in up to three years of incarceration and a fine of up to $10,000.

A necessity defense for felony shoplifting in California may include lack of intent, mistaken identity, or contesting the value of the merchandise. Additionally, an individual may argue that they developed the intent to steal after entering the store or that they forgot to pay for an item.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment