Why Virginia And New York Ratified The Constitution

The ratification of the US Constitution by Virginia and New York was a crucial step in the formation of the United States. Led by James Madison and George Washington, Virginia's delegates to the Constitutional Convention prepared a plan for a strong national government with proportional representation in a bicameral legislature. This plan, known as The Virginia Plan of Government, became the basis for debate and helped shape the final Constitution. New York, meanwhile, played a key role in calling for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation's governing document, with Alexander Hamilton leading the charge. The ratification process in New York was marked by a struggle between the Anti-Federalists, led by Governor George Clinton, and the Federalists, led by Hamilton, who was the only New York member of the Constitutional Convention to sign the Constitution.

Explore related products

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$25.07 $40

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 12: Ratification of the Constitution by the States, Maryland, No. 1 (Volume 12)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 1: Constitutional Documents and Records 1776-1787 (Volume 1)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 41: Bill of Rights, No. 5 (Volume 41)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 11: Ratification of the Constitution by the States, Maryland, No. 1 (Volume 11)

$95

The Federalist Papers

Hamilton was instrumental in leading the call for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation's governing document. He believed that the country needed a stronger, more centralized government, and that the Articles of Confederation were no longer sufficient.

The Virginia Plan of Government

The plan was presented to the convention on May 29, 1787, by Virginia’s governor, Edmund Randolph, who ultimately refused to sign the Constitution. The Virginia Plan became the basis for debate at the convention, and it is credited with shaping the final form of the US Constitution.

The Virginia Plan's emphasis on proportional representation and a strong national government reflected the interests and concerns of the large states. These states sought to ensure that their influence and power would be adequately represented in the new government. By providing for a bicameral legislature, the Virginia Plan aimed to balance the representation of states based on population and ensure that larger states had a stronger voice.

Additionally, the Virginia Plan's support for a strong national government with veto power over state laws reflected a desire to create a more unified and cohesive nation. This was a significant shift from the weaker central government established by the Articles of Confederation, which had granted significant autonomy to the individual states.

The Virginia Plan's influence extended beyond the ratification of the Constitution. It laid the foundation for the structure and principles of the US government, shaping the nation's political system and the balance of power between the states and the federal government.

The Articles of Confederation

New York's Alexander Hamilton led the call for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation's governing document. The Confederation Congress endorsed his initiative, and representatives from all 13 states were invited to convene in Philadelphia on 25 May 1787. The initial purpose of the Convention was to amend the Articles of Confederation, but the ultimate outcome was the proposal and creation of a completely new form of government.

The ratification of the Constitution was a significant moment in the history of the United States, as it marked the transition from a loose confederation of states to a more unified and centralised nation. The Constitution established a strong national government with the power to make laws and conduct foreign relations, while the states retained certain powers and rights under the system of federalism.

Explore related products

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 37: The Bill of Rights, No. 1 (Volume 37)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 38: Bill of Rights, No. 2, The Public Debate, September 1787-May 1788 (Volume 38)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 40: Bill of Rights, No. 4, 1 January-31 August 1789 (Volume 40)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 8: Ratification of the Constitution by the States: Virginia, No. 1 (Volume 8)

$95

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 39: Bill of Rights, No. 3, The Public Debate, 4 June-31 December 1788 (Volume 39)

$95

The Anti-Federalist contingent

The ratification of the US Constitution in New York in 1788 was preceded by a struggle between the Anti-Federalist contingent, led by Governor George Clinton, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton. The Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the Constitution, which was ultimately signed by Hamilton, the only New York member of the Constitutional Convention to do so.

The Anti-Federalists' stance was in opposition to the Federalists' desire for a stronger, more centralised government. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, who had initially called for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation's governing document, the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation had been tailored to a newly formed nation of states acting more like independent, sovereign countries, but it became clear to some of America's leaders that future stability required a stronger central government.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government and took away the independence of the states. They were concerned that the strong national government proposed in the Constitution would infringe on the rights of the states and the people. The Anti-Federalists also argued that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties and that it gave too much power to the executive branch of the government.

The ratification of the Constitution in Virginia was also a contentious issue. Virginia's governor, Edmund Randolph, refused to sign the Constitution, even though the Virginia delegates to the Constitutional Convention, led by James Madison and George Washington, had prepared a plan of government that provided for proportional representation in a bicameral (two-house) legislature and a strong national government with veto power over state laws. The Virginia Plan, as it was known, became the basis for debate at the Constitutional Convention.

The Federalists

Hamilton led the call for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation’s governing document, arguing that future stability required a stronger, more centralized government. The Confederation Congress endorsed his initiative, and representatives from all 13 states were subsequently invited to convene in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787, to participate in the Convention.

Frequently asked questions