Federalist Arguments: Constitution's Defense Strategies

The Federalists were supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and believed that a stronger national government was necessary after the failed Articles of Confederation. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. Federalists also believed that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution and that the document had many built-in safeguards. They asserted that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights because the new Constitution did not vest the new government with the authority to suppress individual liberties.

Explore related products

The Original Argument: The Federalists' Case for the Constitution, Adapted for the 21st Century

$3.57 $16

The Federalist Papers | U.S. Constitution: | All 85 Federalist Papers | The U.S. Constitution | The Bill of Rights | All Amendments | New Edition

$11.97

The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings (Leather-bound Classics)

$13.21 $24.99

The Federalist Papers: The Best Argument for the Constitution

$16.95

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Constitution was an improvement on the Articles of Confederation

The Federalists, who supported the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, argued that the Constitution was a significant improvement over the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution. The Articles of Confederation, the first U.S. Constitution, had several shortcomings that the Federalists believed the new Constitution addressed.

One of the key improvements of the Constitution over the Articles of Confederation was the establishment of a strong federal government. The Articles of Confederation gave almost all power to the individual states, resulting in a weak central government that struggled to enforce laws. The Constitution, on the other hand, set up a strong national government with greater congressional powers, a more powerful executive, and an independent judiciary. Federalists, including influential figures like Alexander Hamilton, argued that this stronger federal government was necessary to ensure the country's survival and effectively address the concerns of the people.

The Federalists also emphasized the importance of separation of powers and checks and balances within the government. They believed that by dividing the government into three equal branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—no single branch or person would have too much power. This balanced approach was designed to prevent the consolidation of power in a distant, central government, addressing the concerns that had led to the American Revolution. Federalists saw the Constitution as a document that supported federalism and protected the natural rights to life, liberty, and property.

In addition, the Federalists argued that the Constitution provided safeguards to protect the liberties of the people. While the Anti-Federalists advocated for a bill of rights to guarantee certain basic freedoms, such as freedom of speech and trial by jury, the Federalists believed that the Constitution already contained protections for individual liberties. They pointed to Article I, Sections 9 and 10, which limited the powers of both Congress and the states. Federalists also argued that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints, served as an effective check on government power and made a clear distinction between state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution.

Furthermore, the Federalists saw the Constitution as a flexible document that could be amended or changed over time. Several states suggested amendments simultaneously as they voted to ratify the Constitution, recognizing that it was a work in progress. This adaptability allowed for the inclusion of additional protections, such as the Bill of Rights, which was added in 1791 to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists.

The Constitution could be amended

The Federalists, supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, argued that the document could be amended or changed. They believed that the Constitution was a significant improvement over the Articles of Confederation, which gave almost all power to individual states and resulted in a weak central government. The Federalists, including influential figures like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, advocated for a strong national government, weaker state governments, and a more mercantile economy. They saw the Constitution as a way to safeguard the liberty and independence gained from the American Revolution.

The Federalists' support for a strong central government was driven by their belief that the greatest threat to the nation lay not in the abuse of central power, but in the excesses of democracy. They pointed to events like Shays' Rebellion and pro-debtor state policies as evidence of the need for a stronger central authority. To address concerns about individual liberties, the Federalists argued that the Constitution already contained protections in Article I, Sections 9 and 10, which limited both Congress and the states. They also promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties, which later became the Bill of Rights.

The Federalists' arguments for a strong national government and the amendability of the Constitution were crucial in convincing enough states to ratify the document. In December 1787, Delaware became the first state to approve the Constitution, and by June 1788, New Hampshire provided the ninth and final vote needed for ratification. The Federalists' willingness to amend the Constitution played a significant role in building support for its adoption, even among those who had initial reservations.

While the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing views on the role of the central government, they both recognized the importance of protecting Americans from excessive government control. The Anti-Federalists, who favoured state governments, demanded freedoms that later became the first ten amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights. Despite their differing philosophies, both groups left their mark on the Constitution, shaping the foundation of the American political system.

The Constitution already contained protections for individual liberties

The Federalists argued that the Constitution already contained protections for individual liberties. They pointed to Article I, Sections 9 and 10, which limited Congress and the states, respectively. They also argued that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints and checks and balances, was effectively a Bill of Rights.

The Federalists believed that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution and that a stronger national government was necessary after the failed Articles of Confederation. They argued that the new government created by the Constitution had many built-in safeguards to prevent it from becoming too powerful. These included limited government, where the national government only had the powers specifically granted to it under the Constitution, and the separation of powers, where the basic powers of government were divided into three equal branches to prevent any one branch or person from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists also argued that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights because the new Constitution did not vest the new government with the authority to suppress individual liberties. They further argued that because it would be impossible to list all the rights afforded to Americans, it would be best to list none. They believed that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous. It was unnecessary because the new federal government had no authority to regulate freedoms of the press or religion, for example. It was dangerous because any listing of rights could be interpreted as exhaustive, and rights omitted could be considered as not retained.

The Federalists also believed that bills of rights had historically been useless when they were most needed and that the state constitutions already delegated to the state all rights and powers which were not explicitly reserved to the people. They argued that the state governments had broad authority to regulate even personal and private matters, while the federal government only had strictly delegated powers limited to the general interests of the nation.

Explore related products

The Federalist Papers (Signet Classics)

$7.23 $8.95

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Dispute: The Original Arguments For Each

$0.99 $25.13

THE ORIGINAL FEDERALIST CASE FOR THE CONSTITUTION: THE FEDERALIST PAPERS AND OTHER KEY AMERICAN WRITINGS ON LIBERTY (The Federalist Papers and Other Writings Book 1)

$2.99

Federalist Papers: The Best Argument for the Constitution

$9.95

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Federalist Papers By Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison (Illustrated & Annotated): Foundational Arguments for the U.S. Constitution

$18.59

The Constitution supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism

The Federalists, including big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, supported the Constitution. They favoured weaker state governments, a strong centralised government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy.

The Constitution divides governmental power among three branches: the Legislative Power of the Federal Government is vested in Congress; the Executive Power in the President; and the Judicial Power in the Supreme Court and any lower courts created by Congress. The Constitution also features many checks and balances. For example, bicameralism reduces legislative predominance, while the presidential veto gives the President a means of defending his priorities and preventing congressional overreach. The Senate's role in appointments and treaties provides a check on the President. The courts are assured independence from the political branches through good-behaviour tenure and security of compensation.

Federalism refers to the division and sharing of power between the national and state governments. The Framers sought to establish a unified national government of limited powers while maintaining a distinct sphere of autonomy in which state governments could exercise a general police power. The Tenth Amendment provides that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution

Federalists believed that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the failed Articles of Confederation. The Federalists argued that the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution, had resulted in a weak central government that was unable to enforce laws. They believed that the nation required a stronger union, with a more centralized government, to endure.

The Federalists, who were largely big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, advocated for a stronger national government with more expansive powers. They supported a strong federal government with greater congressional powers, a more powerful executive, and an independent judiciary. They believed that this new government would better protect the natural rights to life, liberty, and property.

The Federalists also argued that the Constitution included protections for individual liberties. They pointed to Article I, Sections 9 and 10, which limited the powers of Congress and the states, respectively. They also argued that the entire Constitution, with its checks and balances, served as a Bill of Rights. Additionally, they believed that because it was impossible to list all the rights afforded to Americans, it was best to list none, to avoid any potential interpretation of omitted rights as not retained.

The Federalists' belief in the necessity of the Constitution for the nation's survival was so strong that they published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers, advocating for its ratification. Their arguments convinced enough states that, despite its imperfections, the Constitution was a significant improvement over the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, officially becoming the law of the land in 1789.

Frequently asked questions