Campaign Finance Laws: Purposes And Their Limits

Campaign finance laws are a set of regulations that govern the funding, advertising, accounting, and procedures of political campaigns. These laws aim to ensure transparency, integrity, and fairness in the election process by limiting the amount of money that individuals, organisations, and political parties can contribute to specific candidates during elections. The laws also mandate regular disclosures by candidates in the form of reports. The first campaign finance law in the US was the Tillman Act, enacted in 1907, which barred corporations and national banks from contributing to federal election campaigns. Since then, there have been four major periods of US campaign finance regulation, with the most recent being the era following Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (2010), a Supreme Court ruling that struck down key provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002.

Characteristics and Values of Campaign Finance Laws

Explore related products

The Campaign Finance Cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$20.67 $29.99

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®

$12.77 $16.95

PACs, Activism, & Campaign Finance Law: How You Can Quickly & Easily Build Your Own Political Action Committee using PACs, Super PACs, and FARA (The ... and the Science of Electioneering)

$19

Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values)

$19.84 $32

Analysis of Federal and state campaign finance law, summaries, and quick-reference charts

$25.99

US Federal Election Law: US Title 52 Code - Voting Rights, Election Administration, Campaign Finance

$14.95

Limitations on individual and organisation contributions

Campaign finance laws are designed to regulate campaign donations, spending, and public funding. They are enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which sets contribution limits for individuals and groups.

The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) limits the amount of money individuals and political organisations can donate to a candidate running for federal office. These limits apply to both the amount an individual can contribute and the total amount a candidate can receive from all sources. For example, an individual may contribute up to a certain limit to a publicly funded presidential primary candidate, but only a maximum of $250 of each individual's contribution is counted towards federal matching funds.

FECA also prohibits corporations and labour unions from making direct contributions or expenditures in connection with federal elections. This includes "hard money", or direct donations to candidates, and national party committees. However, these organisations may sponsor a "separate segregated fund" (SSF), known as a "connected PAC".

In addition to limits on the amount of money that can be contributed, there are also restrictions on who can donate. For example, individuals who are not US citizens or permanent residents are prohibited from contributing to federal candidates. There are also restrictions on contributions from foreign nationals, federal contractors, and certain types of organisations, such as corporations and labour unions.

Candidates are required to disclose the sources of their campaign contributions and expenditures. This includes reporting the names of individuals and organisations that contributed to their campaigns, as well as the amounts contributed. This information is made available to the public through the FEC, which provides a database that allows anyone to search for a candidate's campaign finances.

FECA also sets limits on the amount of money that candidates can spend on their campaigns. For example, a publicly funded presidential primary candidate must agree to limit spending from their personal funds to $50,000. Candidates who accept government funding are also typically subject to spending limits. However, it's important to note that candidates can spend their own personal funds on their campaigns without restriction, as long as they report the amount spent to the FEC.

Reporting and disclosure requirements

Federal campaign finance laws mandate regular disclosure by candidates and political committees through the submission of detailed reports. These reports must include information about the sources, recipients, amounts, and frequency of contributions received. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is responsible for enforcing these reporting obligations, and the reports are made available to the public. However, it is important to note that social welfare groups, regulated under Section 501(c)(4) of the federal tax code, are not required to disclose their donors.

The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), enacted in 1971 and amended in 1974, played a pivotal role in enhancing disclosure requirements. FECA established stringent standards for federal candidates, political parties, and political action committees (PACs), requiring them to disclose their receipts and disbursements. This amendment addressed the need for a central administrative authority to effectively enforce campaign finance laws.

In addition to federal regulations, state and local governments have their own reporting and disclosure requirements for campaigns operating within their jurisdictions. These requirements may vary, and it is important for campaigns to adhere to the specific rules applicable to their respective states or localities.

The reporting and disclosure landscape has evolved over time, with four significant periods of regulation in the past century. Before the enactment of FECA in 1971, campaign finance laws primarily focused on specific types of contributors. FECA introduced comprehensive limitations on candidate spending, contributions from individuals and PACs, and reporting obligations. The subsequent era, from 1974 to 2002, witnessed FECA's direct regulation of campaigns, further shaping the disclosure landscape.

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002 marked another critical juncture, addressing the emergence of "soft money" donations and imposing restrictions on electioneering communications by advocacy groups. BCRA prohibited national parties from accepting soft money contributions and restricted political advertising by organizations receiving corporate or labour funding during specific periods before primary and general elections.

Regulations on advertising and spending

Campaign finance laws are designed to regulate the money used to fund political campaigns, and they apply to candidates for federal office, as well as state and local candidates. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) enforces these laws, which include setting limits on campaign contributions and overseeing public funding in presidential elections.

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), also known as the "McCain-Feingold" Act, amended the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in several ways. Firstly, it prohibited national political party committees from soliciting or spending any soft money, and barred state and local party committees from using soft money for activities influencing federal elections. Soft money refers to donations with no limits on the amount that can be given or received, and they can come from any source, including corporations and unions.

Secondly, the BCRA prohibited the use of corporate and union treasury funds to pay for "electioneering communications" within a certain timeframe of an election. These are broadcast or cable advertisements that clearly identify a federal candidate, and the law also required candidates to appear in these ads to take responsibility for them.

Independent expenditures are another form of spending in political campaigns. These are sums spent on political advertising in support of or against a particular candidate, but they are not coordinated with the candidate's campaign or committee. There are generally no limits placed on independent expenditures. Super PACs, or independent expenditure-only committees, can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to advocate for or against political candidates, and they must file regular reports with the FEC.

Social welfare groups, on the other hand, are not required to disclose their donors. These groups are defined as non-profit organisations operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare or charitable purposes.

While campaign finance reports filed with the FEC are available to the public, the law prohibits the use of individual contributor information for solicitation or commercial purposes. This ensures that personal information is protected while still providing transparency into the sources of campaign funding.

Explore related products

The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook

$31.83

Campaign Finance & American Democracy: What the Public Really Thinks and Why It Matters

$2.99 $32

The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform

$29.17 $32

The Nigerian Campaign Finance Law

$50

Michigan Campaign Finance Second Edition

$295

Campaigns, Congress, and Courts: The Making of Federal Campaign Finance Law

$95

Enforcement and jurisdiction

Campaign finance laws are designed to regulate the influence of money in politics, specifically targeting the impact of large donors and the role of corporations and unions. These laws are enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which has exclusive jurisdiction over the civil enforcement of federal campaign finance law.

The FEC is responsible for enforcing federal campaign finance laws, including monitoring donation prohibitions, setting contribution limits, and overseeing public funding for presidential campaigns. The FEC's jurisdiction, however, does not extend to laws relating to voting, voter fraud and intimidation, ballot access, or election results. These matters are handled by the appropriate federal or state agencies.

The FEC's enforcement process is designed to be transparent and accessible to the public. Anyone can submit a complaint if they believe a violation of the law has occurred or is about to occur, and enforcement cases can originate from audits, complaints, referrals from other government agencies, or self-submissions. The FEC's website provides information on how to file a complaint and access enforcement case documents.

Enforcement cases are primarily handled by the FEC's Office of General Counsel and are known as Matters Under Review (MURs). The Office of General Counsel may also resolve some matters through the Commission's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program or the Administrative Fine Program.

The FEC also has the power to conduct audits and reviews of committee reports to detect potential violations. In addition, other government agencies can refer possible violations to the FEC, and the Commission has released documents relating to enforcement and compliance processes to increase transparency.

The FEC's enforcement of campaign finance laws aims to ensure compliance with the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), which sets limits on campaign contributions to candidates for president and Congress. The FEC's jurisdiction and enforcement processes are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the electoral process and addressing public concerns about the influence of money in politics.

History of campaign finance laws

Campaign finance laws have a long history in the United States, with the first federal campaign finance law passed in 1867. This law, a Naval Appropriations Bill, prohibited officers and government employees from soliciting contributions from Navy yard workers. The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883 furthered this, making it illegal for government officials to solicit contributions from any civil service workers and requiring that government jobs be given based on merit.

In the early 20th century, Progressive advocates, journalists, and political satirists pushed for reforms to address the influence of corporate and moneyed interests in politics. In 1905, following a corporate fundraising scandal in his own campaign, President Theodore Roosevelt called for a ban on corporate contributions to political committees. This resulted in the Tillman Act of 1907, which prohibited corporations and national banks from contributing to federal campaigns and required public disclosure of money spent on elections by political parties.

In the 1970s, the landscape of campaign finance regulation changed significantly with the passing of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). This Act created a framework for regulating contribution limits and reporting and established the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) to oversee and enforce campaign finance laws. The 1972 presidential campaign, which saw serious financial abuses, and the Watergate scandal in 1974, spurred amendments to FECA to strengthen enforcement and set limits on contributions by individuals, political parties, and PACs (political action committees).

Since then, campaign finance laws have continued to evolve, with ongoing debates and legal challenges regarding the role of money in politics. Citizens United v. FEC, for example, struck down limits on independent expenditures by corporations and labor unions, while other cases have upheld contribution limits while overturning expenditure limits. Recent studies and opinions polls highlight ongoing concerns about the influence of large donors and the increasing use of personal wealth by billionaires to influence political outcomes.

Frequently asked questions