Key Provisions Of Japan's Constitution

The Japanese Constitution, implemented in 1947, is founded on three key principles: pacifism, popular sovereignty, and fundamental human rights. The document's preamble contains a firm declaration of popular sovereignty, stating that sovereign power resides with the people. The Emperor's role is limited to ceremonial matters of state, with no involvement in government. The constitution also provides a framework for local government, requiring elected heads and assemblies, and that local laws must be approved by residents. It forbids war and raising arms in conflict, but allows for self-defence forces. The constitution has not been amended since its implementation, despite efforts by the Liberal Democratic Party.

Explore related products

Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan (Asia-Pacific: Culture, Politics, and Society)

$2.89 $34.95

The Constitution of Japan: A Contextual Analysis (Constitutional Systems of the World)

$44.95

THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN: ENGLISH-JAPANESE EDITION

$0.99 $9.99

Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan

$32.5 $43

Drunk Japan: Law and Alcohol in Japanese Society

$80.79 $125

Forces of Order: Policing Modern Japan

$28.01 $29.95

Pacifism and the abolition of war

The Japanese Constitution, implemented in 1947, contains provisions that reflect the country's commitment to pacifism and the abolition of war. Article 9 of the Constitution states that "the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes". This article also stipulates that Japan will not maintain land, sea, and air forces, or other war potential. The inclusion of this "no-war" provision was influenced by General MacArthur, who drew on the idea of a world without war expressed in the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact.

The interpretation and application of Article 9 have been debated over time. While it clearly forbids war and the use of arms in conflict, there is ambiguity regarding national defense and self-defense forces. Some argue that it allows for ground, air, and maritime self-defense forces, while others caution that it could prevent Japan from contributing to international peacekeeping efforts. The ambiguity of Article 9 came to the fore during the Cold War, when the communist victory in the Chinese Civil War and the Korean War raised questions about regional security.

The Japanese people embraced the no-war provision, and there was early support for the Constitution, indicating that it was not solely a product of foreign imposition. However, there have been movements, particularly by the Liberal Democratic Party, to amend the Constitution, reflecting a desire among some in future generations to move away from the pacifism that underpins it.

Popular sovereignty

The Japanese Constitution, implemented in 1947, contains a firm declaration of the principle of popular sovereignty. This is proclaimed in the name of the "Japanese people" and asserts that "sovereign power resides with the people".

The principle of popular sovereignty is evident in the constitution's preamble, which states that the government is a "sacred trust of the people", with its authority derived from them. This reflects the democratic ideals embraced by the Japanese people, who have shown support for fundamental human rights as a core principle of their constitution.

The process of drafting the constitution involved active participation from the Japanese public. Between late 1945 and spring 1946, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP) received 12 proposals for constitutional revisions from various political parties, grassroots organisations, and individuals outside the Japanese government. These proposals included a range of topics, such as the role of the emperor, economic rights, gender equity, and the right to education. The drafters of the constitution, led by General MacArthur, considered these suggestions, and many were incorporated into the final document. This engagement from the Japanese people demonstrates their commitment to shaping their nation's future and ensuring their voices were heard in the country's foundational document.

The principle of popular sovereignty is further reflected in the constitution's provisions for local government. It requires that local entities have elected heads and assemblies, and that government acts applicable to specific areas must be approved by the residents of those areas. This framework for local autonomy empowers the people at a grassroots level, giving them a direct say in the decisions that affect their communities.

Additionally, the Japanese Constitution's stance on war and international disputes reflects the will of the people. Article 9 of the constitution, known for its renunciation of war, aligns with the public's embrace of the "no-war" provision. It states that the Japanese people "forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes". This commitment to peace and the rejection of war as a means of resolving disputes is a powerful expression of the people's will and their desire for a peaceful future.

Fundamental human rights

The Japanese Constitution, implemented in 1947, outlines fundamental human rights as a core principle. These rights are guaranteed to the people and are to be conferred upon the current and future generations as "eternal and inviolate rights".

The Constitution explicitly states that the people "shall not be prevented from enjoying any of the fundamental human rights". This statement ensures that individuals have the freedom to exercise and access their fundamental rights without obstruction.

The protection of fundamental human rights in Japan is deeply rooted in the country's democratic values and has been strongly adopted and supported by the Japanese public. The Constitution serves as a framework for safeguarding these rights and ensuring they are respected and upheld.

One notable aspect of fundamental human rights in the Japanese Constitution is the right to sue the state. This right is guaranteed under Article 17, which was added by the House of Representatives. It provides individuals with the legal recourse to hold the state accountable for any torts or wrongful acts committed by government officials.

Additionally, the Constitution also establishes the principle of popular sovereignty, declaring that "sovereign power resides with the people". This principle affirms that the government derives its authority from the people and exists to serve their interests.

The Japanese Constitution has not been amended since its implementation, and the people's early support for it indicated their endorsement of its principles, including fundamental human rights.

Explore related products

The Ritual of Rights in Japan: Law, Society, and Health Policy (Cambridge Studies in Law and Society)

$59

Japan's Colonization of Korea: Discourse and Power (Peoples of Hawai'i, the Pacific, & Asia)

$24

Imagining Exile in Heian Japan: Banishment in Law, Literature, and Cult

$31.8 $42

From Imperial Myth to Democracy: Japan's Two Constitutions, 1889-2002

$21.95

Refugee Law and Practice in Japan (Law and Migration)

$65.54 $68.99

Original Texts and English Translations of Japanese Laws and Acts Related to Intellectual Property: Copyright, Trademark, Design, Patent, Utility Model, and Unfair Competition Prevention Act of Japan

$35.68

The Emperor's role

The role of the Emperor of Japan is outlined in the country's constitution, which came into effect in 1947. The constitution starts with an imperial edict made by the Emperor, containing the Emperor's Privy Seal and signature.

The Emperor, along with the Regent and the Ministers of State, members of the Diet, judges, and all other public officials, has the obligation to respect and uphold the Constitution. The constitution also outlines that it is the supreme law of the nation, and no law, ordinance, imperial rescript or other acts of government contrary to the provisions of the Constitution shall have legal force or validity.

The constitution was adopted as an amendment to the Meiji Constitution, with the new document maintaining legal continuity with the previous constitution. The Emperor played a role in this process, submitting the draft constitution to the Imperial Diet, which was elected by universal suffrage. The old constitution required a two-thirds majority in both houses of the Diet for the new constitution to become law, and both chambers made amendments.

Local government

The Japanese Constitution, written in 1946 and implemented in 1947, includes provisions for local self-government, which were absent in the Meiji Constitution. Articles 92 to 95 of the Constitution of Japan outline the framework for local government, requiring local entities to have elected heads and assemblies.

Article 92 states:

> Regulations concerning the organisation and operations of local public entities shall be fixed by law in accordance with the principle of local autonomy.

This means that local governments have a degree of independence from the national government in terms of their operations. The Local Autonomy Law of 1947, which established the modern system of prefectures, municipalities, and other local government entities, further solidified this framework. The number of prefectures has been stable at 47 since the adoption of the new Constitution and local autonomy law in 1947.

The US Government's "Reform of the Japanese Governmental System (SWNCC 228)", sent to MacArthur in January 1946, emphasised the need for "the popular election or local appointment of as many of the prefectural officials as practicable" to strengthen prefectural and municipal assemblies. This shift in power dynamics between the central and local governments was a significant departure from the pre-war structure, where control of local areas was centralised with the national government.

The principle of local autonomy is further emphasised in the Constitution, allowing local public entities to create their own regulations within the laws enacted by the Diet. This provision grants local governments the authority to make policy decisions independently, with the chief executive being responsible for administration. The assembly can hold a "no confidence" vote against the chief executive, similar to the US presidential structure. If the vote passes, the chief executive can dissolve the assembly and call for new elections.

Frequently asked questions