The Constitution's Exact Words On Freedom

The First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This amendment, ratified in 1791, forms part of the Bill of Rights, which outlines fundamental freedoms and protections for citizens. The Supreme Court has affirmed that the First Amendment protects the right to receive information and ideas and safeguards individuals from government intrusion into their privacy and control of their thoughts.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Pocket U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence by Cato Institute

$6.94

Three Documents of Freedom Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights

$15.97

The U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Pocket Size (Annotated)

$7.49

3- Pocket U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence (Three Pack)

$13.11 $19.99

The Constitution of the United States

$1.5

Freedom of religion: Congress cannot promote one religion or restrict religious practices

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It explicitly states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". This means that Congress is prohibited from promoting any one religion over others and from restricting an individual's religious practices.

The First Amendment ensures that people are free to practise their chosen religion without interference from the government. This includes the freedom to believe, worship, and express one's religious beliefs. It also protects the right of individuals not to follow a particular religion or to hold non-religious beliefs.

The Amendment's wording is designed to prevent the establishment of a state religion. This is often referred to as the "Establishment Clause". The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause as mandating the accommodation, rather than merely the tolerance, of all religions and forbidding hostility towards any religion.

The free exercise clause, "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", protects the right to practise religion. This includes the right to engage in religious activities, such as worship services, rituals, and other forms of religious expression. It also protects the right of religious institutions to operate freely, including the establishment of religious schools and the employment of religious leaders.

The First Amendment's protection of religious freedom is a cornerstone of the U.S. Constitution and reflects the American founders' understanding of the importance of religious liberty. It ensures that individuals have the right to practise their religion without government interference, promoting a diverse and tolerant society.

Freedom of expression: Congress cannot restrict the press or an individual's right to speak freely

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of expression, specifically prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. The exact wording is as follows:

> "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This amendment ensures that individuals are free to express themselves without interference or censorship from the government. It protects their right to share and receive information, ideas, and opinions, regardless of their content or popularity. The Supreme Court affirmed this interpretation in Thornhill v. Alabama (1940), stating that the freedom of speech and of the press includes "the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully all matters of public concern, without previous restraint or fear of subsequent punishment."

The First Amendment's protection of free speech and freedom of the press is not absolute, however. While it shields against prior restraint and subsequent punishment for expressing certain views, there are limitations. For example, in Chicago Police Dept. v. Mosley (1972), the Supreme Court acknowledged that the First Amendment does not guarantee "the right to express any thought, free from government censorship." This means that while individuals have the right to speak freely, they may still face consequences for their speech in certain circumstances.

The First Amendment also does not prevent private entities from imposing their own restrictions on speech. Additionally, while the government generally cannot restrict the content of speech, it can regulate the time, place, and manner of speech to protect public safety and order. For instance, the government may enforce reasonable restrictions on the volume and duration of speeches in public spaces to prevent excessive noise pollution.

In conclusion, the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression serves as a cornerstone of democratic society, fostering open dialogue, a diversity of viewpoints, and government accountability. While not absolute, the protection it affords to free speech and a free press plays a critical role in safeguarding individual liberties and empowering citizens to engage in robust and uninhibited debate.

Freedom of assembly: People have the right to assemble peacefully

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the freedom of assembly, among other freedoms. The exact wording in the Constitution regarding freedom of assembly is:

> "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging [...] the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. The right to assemble peacefully, or freedom of assembly, is a fundamental right that allows citizens to gather together in a peaceful manner. This right is often associated with the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, as it enables individuals to collectively express their views and engage in political action.

The Supreme Court has affirmed the historical basis for the right of peaceful assembly, stating that it has always been one of the attributes of citizenship in a free government. The Court has also treated the right of assembly as distinct from the right to petition, recognizing that the holding of peaceful meetings for political action is a fundamental freedom.

While the First Amendment guarantees freedom of assembly, it is important to note that this right is not absolute. The level of protection provided by the First Amendment is not limitless, as noted by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger in Chicago Police Dept. v. Mosley (1972). There may be certain qualifications and restrictions on the freedom of assembly, such as those related to public order and safety.

Explore related products

Documents of Freedom Boxed Set (Books of American Wisdom)

$0.9 $11.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$19.99 $3.89

The United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Large Print Edition (Annotated)

$9.99

The Charters of Freedom: United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights

$4.95 $4.95

Constitution of the United States: US Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments. Pocket Size

$8.99 $2.79

The Bill of Rights: A Kid's Guide to Freedom in America

$6.99 $6.99

Freedom to petition: Citizens can petition the government for a redress of grievances

The right to petition the government is a fundamental freedom outlined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This right guarantees citizens the ability to approach the government with their grievances and seek redress without fear of punishment or reprisal. The exact words in the Constitution regarding this freedom are: "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This right has been integral to significant historical movements in the United States, such as the fight to abolish slavery. Starting in 1836, the House of Representatives adopted gag rules to automatically table anti-slavery petitions. However, these rules were eventually repealed in 1844 due to their contradiction with the Constitutional right to petition.

The right to petition allows citizens to express their ideas, hopes, and concerns to their elected representatives. It is a form of civil action against the government, which may result in the courts directing the government to act or refrain from acting in a specific manner. The right to petition is not limited to federal legislatures and courts but extends to all departments of the government, including state and federal legislatures, and the executive branch.

While the right to petition is well-established, it is not absolute. Supreme Court cases such as McDonald v. Smith (1985) have acknowledged the limitations of the petition clause. Additionally, public employees suing their employer under the First Amendment's Speech or Petition Clauses must demonstrate that they spoke as citizens on a matter of public concern, as established in Connick v. Myers, Garcetti v. Ceballos, and Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri.

The right to petition is often overlooked in favour of other freedoms, but it is a powerful tool for citizens to hold the government accountable and ensure their voices are heard. It is a critical component of a democratic society, allowing for the peaceful resolution of grievances and the protection of civil liberties.

Freedom of privacy: People are free from government intrusion into their privacy and control of their thoughts

While the US Constitution does not explicitly mention the term "privacy", the Supreme Court has inferred a right to privacy from the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments. This interpretation has been supported by several Supreme Court cases, including Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, which established a right to privacy in marriage, and Eisenstadt, which extended privacy rights to unmarried couples.

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution protected a right of privacy in marriage, even though it was not specifically mentioned. Justice William O. Douglas, writing for the majority, described this right as part of the "'penumbra' of several amendments, including the First Amendment's freedom of association, the Third and Fourth Amendments' protection of the sanctity of private homes, and the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against self-incrimination.

The Ninth Amendment, which states that the "enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people", has also been interpreted to protect privacy rights, particularly in the context of marital relationships. Justice Arthur Goldberg argued that the idea of liberty in the Fourteenth Amendment further protects unenumerated personal rights, such as the right to privacy, that are not listed in the Bill of Rights or any other part of the Constitution.

In addition to the Supreme Court's interpretation, privacy rights have also been shaped by state laws and judicial interpretations. For example, in Packer Corporation v. Utah (1932), Justice Brandeis suggested that the Court should consider the conditions under which privacy interests are intruded upon, setting the stage for the distinction between privacy interests in the home and in public. The First Amendment protection of privacy is strongest when the invasion of privacy occurs in the home or in places where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

While privacy rights are important, they often clash with First Amendment rights, such as the freedom of the press. In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975), the Court ruled that the freedom of the press to publish publicly available information about a crime outweighed privacy rights. Similarly, in Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001), the Court upheld the right of a radio station to broadcast a private conversation involving public persons and political matters, even though it had been illegally intercepted.

In conclusion, while the US Constitution does not explicitly mention privacy, the Supreme Court has interpreted it to include a right to privacy, particularly in the context of marriage and the home. This interpretation has been further shaped by state laws and judicial decisions, balancing privacy rights with other constitutional freedoms.

Frequently asked questions