Monarchs Compared: Absolute Vs Constitutional Rule

Absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy are two different systems of governance. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch holds supreme power and acts as both the head of state and government, with no constitution to limit their powers. On the other hand, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch shares power with an elected parliament and acts within the limits prescribed by an established legal framework. While the monarch in an absolute monarchy is the sole decision-maker, a constitutional monarchy distributes power between the monarch and the government, with the monarch typically having a ceremonial role.

Explore related products

Royal Purple 11757 Set of 2 Max Boost Octane Booster 16-Ounce Bottles

$24.75 $29.98

[(Power System Analysis : Analysis and Design)] [By (author) John Grainger ] published on (February, 1994)

$79.44 $108.07

33 & Beyond: The Royal Art of Freemasonry

$2.99

Royal Arrangement: The Complete Series (Royal Heartbreakers Complete Series Book 3)

$7.99

W. Palm III's System 2nd(Second) edition(System Dynamics [Hardcover])(2009)

$162.4

Third System EP

$2.58

Absolute monarchs are the sole source of political power, unconstrained by constitutions

Absolute monarchy is a form of monarchy in which the sovereign is the sole source of political power and authority. This means that an absolute monarch has complete and unrestricted power over the government and the people. Unlike constitutional monarchies, absolute monarchies are unconstrained by constitutions, legislatures, or other checks on their authority. The monarch in an absolute monarchy is not bound by any written law, legislature, court, economic sanction, religion, custom, or electoral process.

The succession of power in an absolute monarchy is typically hereditary, with the throne passing among members of a ruling family. This is in contrast to dictatorships, which often result from military takeovers or an elected official's refusal to step down. While dictatorships can be hereditary, they do not always involve a royal family.

Absolute monarchy reached its high point in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries, with figures such as Louis XIV of France, the "Sun King", embodying this form of rule. In Prussia, King Frederick the Great practiced enlightened absolutism, introducing a civil code, abolishing torture, and establishing the principle of non-interference in matters of justice.

In the Ottoman Empire, the Sultan was considered a "Padishah", or "Great King", and wielded absolute power through heavenly mandates reflected in their titles, such as the "Shadow of God on Earth". Similarly, in Russia, the concept of absolutism was deeply ingrained, and even after some reforms, the Russian Constitution of 1906 described the monarch as an autocrat.

While absolute monarchy was largely supplanted by constitutional monarchy after the French Revolution, which promoted the idea of popular sovereignty, it still exists in countries like Saudi Arabia, Brunei, and Oman.

In summary, absolute monarchy is characterized by the concentration of supreme power in the hands of a single monarch, unconstrained by any constitution or legislative body, and often justified by claims of divine right or mandate.

Constitutional monarchies share power with an elected parliament

A constitutional monarchy, also known as a limited, parliamentary, or democratic monarchy, is a form of government where the monarch's power is restricted by a constitution and shared with an elected parliament. The monarch acts within the framework of the government and has a ceremonial, representative, and civic role, but does not make policies. Their authority is limited by a constitution, legislature, or unwritten customs, or balanced by other officials, such as a prime minister.

Constitutional monarchies differ from absolute monarchies, where the monarch holds supreme power and is the sole source of political power, unconstrained by constitutions, legislatures, or other checks on their authority. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is the only decision-maker, and their power is not limited by any written law, legislature, court, custom, or electoral process.

In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch shares power with an elected parliament, and their role is largely ceremonial and symbolic. They may retain some powers, such as the ability to veto legislation, but their authority is clearly defined and limited by a constitution. The people have a voice in the government through a limited electoral process.

Examples of constitutional monarchies include Japan, the United Kingdom, Spain, Sweden, and Thailand. In Japan, the emperor has ceremonial duties but does not govern directly, while in the United Kingdom, the monarch can theoretically exercise an absolute veto over legislation by withholding royal assent. In Thailand, the monarch is protected by lèse-majesté, which carries strict criminal penalties for violators.

Constitutional monarchies can also vary in the amount of power held by the monarch. In executive monarchies, the monarch wields significant power, although it is not absolute. In ceremonial monarchies, on the other hand, the monarch holds little or no actual power or direct political influence, although they may still have significant social and cultural influence.

Absolute monarchies can respond to emergencies quickly

The absence of a constitution or legislative body to serve as a check on the monarch's power can lead to rapid changes in laws and policies. For example, during times of crisis, an absolute monarch can quickly issue new decrees or enforce strict measures without the need for debate or consensus-building, as seen in the historical examples of Louis XIV of France and Peter I of Russia. This concentration of power in the hands of a single individual enables a swift and decisive response to emergencies.

However, it is worth noting that the effectiveness of an absolute monarchy's response to emergencies depends on various factors, such as the competence and wisdom of the monarch. While some absolute monarchs may possess the skills and resources to effectively manage crises, others may lack the necessary expertise or act in their self-interest rather than for the betterment of their people.

Furthermore, the lack of checks and balances in an absolute monarchy can lead to potential abuses of power. The absence of a legislative body or constitution to constrain the monarch's authority may result in the enactment of arbitrary or unjust laws, with little recourse for the people to influence or challenge these decisions. This concentration of power in a single individual can lead to human rights violations, as absolute monarchs can impose their will without regard for the well-being or consent of their subjects.

In contrast, constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, Japan, and Morocco, provide a system of checks and balances that can slow down decision-making but also help prevent abuses of power. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's power is limited by a constitution and may be balanced by other officials, such as a prime minister or parliament. While this system may not allow for the same swiftness in decision-making as an absolute monarchy, it provides a framework for governing that includes representation and input from the people, helping to ensure that decisions are made with a broader range of perspectives and considerations in mind.

Explore related products

Royal Arrangement #6

$2.99

House II: The Second Story

$4.99

Monarchy Complete Collection

$94.98

Missing Monarchy: Correcting Misconceptions About The Middle Ages, Medieval Kingship, Democracy, And Liberty

$16.99

Monarchy With David Starkey

$34.94 $39.99

The Monarchy (TV Series)

$1.99

Constitutional monarchies allow the people to have a voice in their government

Absolute monarchy is a form of government in which a single person—usually a king or queen—holds absolute, autocratic power. The succession of power is typically hereditary, with the throne passing among members of a ruling family. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is the sole source of political power and is unconstrained by constitutions, legislatures, or other checks on their authority.

Constitutional monarchies, on the other hand, allow the people to have a voice in their government. This is achieved through a limited electoral process, where the monarch shares power with an elected parliament. The authority of the monarch is restricted by a constitution and other officials, such as a prime minister, and they may only play a ceremonial role. For example, in the United Kingdom, the monarch can theoretically exercise an absolute veto over legislation by withholding royal assent, but this is rarely used, and the monarch primarily serves as a symbolic head of state.

The distinction between absolute and constitutional monarchies lies primarily in the distribution of power. In absolute monarchies, the monarch holds complete and unrestricted power over the government and the people, with control over the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. They can respond quickly to emergencies without the need to consult with or gain approval from a legislative body. However, this concentration of power can lead to swift and harsh enforcement of laws, with limited avenues for complaint or redress.

In contrast, constitutional monarchies provide a framework for sharing power between the monarch and other governing bodies, such as a parliament or legislature. While the monarch may retain some significant powers, they are regulated and limited by a constitution, ensuring that the monarch does not have total authority. This allows for a greater voice for the people in the government and provides checks and balances on the power of the monarch.

Examples of constitutional monarchies include Japan, where the emperor has ceremonial duties but does not govern directly, and the United Kingdom, where the monarch has a largely ceremonial role and legislative power rests with Parliament. These countries demonstrate how constitutional monarchies can provide a balance between the tradition and symbolism of monarchy while still allowing for democratic representation and the voice of the people in the government.

Absolute monarchy is associated with rule unconstrained by the checks of feudalism

Absolute monarchy is a form of government in which a single person—usually a king or queen—holds absolute, autocratic power. The succession of power is typically hereditary, with the throne passing among members of a ruling family. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch has complete and unrestricted power over the government and the people. There is no constitution to limit their powers, and they typically have control over the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.

In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is the sole source of political power, unconstrained by constitutions, legislatures, or other checks on their authority. Any complaints or protests against the monarch are considered acts of treason and are punishable by torture and death. The people have no voice in the government or the direction of the country, and all laws are issued by the monarchs and typically serve only their best interests.

The concept of absolutism was so ingrained in Russia that even after the 1905 Revolution, the Russian Constitution of 1906 described the monarch as an autocrat. Similarly, in the Ottoman Empire, the Sultan wielded absolute power and was considered a "Great King" by his people. Many sultans claimed heavenly mandates, reflected in their titles such as "Shadow of God on Earth".

Absolutism began to decline substantially after the French Revolution, which gave rise to the principle of popular sovereignty, or government by the people. This decline continued after World War I, as these events popularized modes of government based on popular sovereignty and opposed to liberal democracy.

Frequently asked questions