Mason's Constitution: Main Concerns And Misgivings

George Mason was a Virginia planter, statesman, and one of the founders of the United States. He is best known for his proposal of a bill of rights at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which he refused to sign due to his belief that it did not adequately protect citizens' rights. Mason's main concerns about the Constitution included the absence of a bill of rights, the federal judiciary, and federal control of militias. He also objected to the improper powers of the Senate and the office of the vice president, and warned of the danger of standing armies in times of peace. Mason's ideas and objections were influential and helped shape the final document.

Explore related products

Secret Societies: Inside the Freemasons, the Yakuza, Skull and Bones, and the World's Most Notorious Secret Organizations

$14.83 $18.99

The Templars and the Assassins: The Militia of Heaven

$14.96 $19.99

Freemasonry: An Introduction

$11.95 $24

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

The Anti-Federalist Papers

$10.95

The Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights

George Mason was a Virginia planter, statesman, and one of the founders of the United States. He was also an Anti-Federalist and a consistent advocate of republicanism. In 1787, he attended the Constitutional Convention, a gathering of representatives from different states tasked with revising the Articles of Confederation, the first Constitution of the United States.

Mason refused to sign the Constitution due to several concerns, one of which was the absence of a bill of rights. He believed that a strong national government without a bill of rights would undermine individual freedom. Mason helped pave the way for a bill of rights by consistently supporting a formal amending process. He proposed a bill of rights at the Constitutional Convention, but it was not included in the final document. This proposal was in line with his earlier work on the Fairfax Resolves, which advanced ideas found in important American documents such as the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.

Mason's concern about the absence of a bill of rights was not his only objection to the Constitution. He also had issues with the federal judiciary, which he believed would lead to suits in federal courts by citizens against states where they did not live. Additionally, he disagreed with the provision prohibiting ex post facto laws. Mason wanted to protect individual liberties and ensure that the government could not retroactively criminalize actions that were legal when committed. He also gave an impassioned speech against slavery, despite owning slaves himself.

Mason's objections to the Constitution were recorded in a document known as "George Mason's Objections to the Constitution." In this document, he outlined his reasons for not signing the Constitution, including the absence of a bill of rights. He circulated these notes, which became a platform for critics of the Constitution. Mason's concerns about the federal courts and other matters were addressed when the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, and he displayed much satisfaction with this development.

The federal judiciary posed a threat to state courts

George Mason was a Virginia planter, statesman, and one of the founders of the United States. He is best known for his proposal of a bill of rights at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. As an Anti-Federalist, he believed that a strong national government without a bill of rights would undermine individual freedom.

Mason's concerns about the federal judiciary and its potential threat to state courts were outlined in his "Objections to the Constitution." He warned that the federal judiciary would lead to citizens suing states in federal courts where they did not live. This prediction came true in the case of Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), which resulted in the passage of the Eleventh Amendment.

In two lengthy speeches, Mason objected to federal control of militias and warned that Congress might use the militias as a pretext for establishing a standing army. He also attacked the federal judiciary, arguing that its broad scope would not only render state courts unnecessary but also destroy state governments. Mason suggested that federal courts should be limited to matters of international law, maritime concerns, and suits involving the United States and two or more states. He even proposed that state judges should decide ordinary matters of federal law.

Mason's concerns about the federal judiciary and state courts were shared by Edmund Randolph, who also believed that the federal judiciary posed a threat to state courts. Randolph suggested that state ratifying conventions propose amendments to the constitution, which could be put into effect or rejected by a second general convention. However, these concerns were not adequately addressed by the Committee of Style or the Convention.

Overall, Mason's objections to the Constitution and his warnings about the federal judiciary and state courts highlight his consistent advocacy for republicanism and his suspicion of governments at all levels. His contributions to the development of the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights, which he warmly welcomed, remain significant in American political history.

Congress's power was too broad

George Mason was a Virginia planter, statesman, and one of the founders of the United States. He was an early advocate for independence from Great Britain and played a significant role in the American Revolution. Mason is known for his proposal of a bill of rights at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where he was among the more effective delegates.

Mason had several concerns about the Constitution, one of which was that Congress's power was too broad. He disagreed with delegates who thought Congress might not have to meet every year, arguing that they underestimated the importance of Congress, which would have not just legislative but "inquisitorial powers." Mason believed that Congress would have the power to declare war, not just "make" it, and he wanted to require a two-thirds vote of Congress for all laws regulating trade to protect the interests of the exporting South against a Northern congressional majority.

In addition to his concerns about Congress's power, Mason also objected to federal control of militias, warning that Congress might make service in the militias unattractive as a pretext for establishing a standing army. He gave an impassioned speech against slavery, which he owned, and he feared that a federal tax on slaves would put a disproportionate burden on the South. Mason also attacked the federal judiciary, predicting that it would lead to suits in federal courts by citizens against states where they did not live. He suggested that federal courts be limited to matters of international law, maritime concerns, and suits involving the United States and two or more states.

Mason's concerns about Congress's power and other issues led him to refuse to sign the Constitution. He drafted a list of objections and circulated them, which became known as George Mason's "Objections to the Constitution." Despite his initial opposition, Mason's stance softened after the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, and he expressed satisfaction with this development.

Explore related products

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Dispute: The Original Arguments For Each

$0.99 $25.13

The Anti-Federalist Writings of the Melancton Smith Circle

$14.5 $29

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$10 $14.95

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist: ALL Essays and Articles in One Edition: Founding Fathers' Political and Philosophical Debate, Their Opinions and Arguments about the Constitution:

$0.99

The Senate was too powerful

George Mason was a Virginia planter, statesman, and one of the founders of the United States. He is best known for his proposal of a bill of rights at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. As an Anti-Federalist, he believed that a strong national government without a bill of rights would undermine individual freedom.

Mason's concerns about the Senate's power were shared by Edmund Randolph, who also believed that Congress's power was too broad. They warned that the federal judiciary would pose a threat to state courts and state governments. Mason suggested that federal courts be limited to matters of international law, maritime concerns, and suits involving the United States and two or more states. He also proposed that state judges decide ordinary matters of federal law.

Mason's concerns about the Senate's power were not fully addressed by the Committee of Style, which was tasked with refining the constitution. He and Randolph continued to object to the constitution even after the delegates had considered a mass of changes. Mason's objections were distributed and became known as "George Mason's Objections to the Constitution."

Mason's concerns about the Senate's power were not limited to the judiciary. He also objected to federal control of militias, predicting that Congress might make service in the militias unattractive as a pretext for establishing a standing army. Additionally, Mason disagreed with delegates who thought Congress might not have to meet every year. He believed that Congress would have important legislative and inquisitorial powers that could not be kept in suspension.

In conclusion, George Mason's main concerns about the Constitution included the Senate's power, specifically regarding the federal judiciary and federal control of militias. He believed that the Senate's power threatened state courts and state governments, and that Congress's power needed to be checked by regular meetings. Mason's objections to the Constitution and his proposal for a bill of rights reflect his commitment to individual freedom and a balanced government.

Federal control of militias was concerning

George Mason was an Anti-Federalist and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. He was a delegate at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which aimed to revise the Articles of Confederation, the first Constitution of the United States. Mason was among the most active and effective participants in the Convention's debates. However, he refused to sign the final document due to several concerns, including federal control of militias.

Mason gave one of his longest speeches against federal control of militias, arguing that it would give Congress the power to establish a standing army. He warned that Congress might make service in the militias unattractive, which could be used as a pretext for creating a standing army. This concern was likely shaped by his belief in a strong and active government, as well as his suspicion of governments at all levels. Mason wanted to limit the power of Congress and protect the interests of the states.

Mason's objection to federal control of militias was part of his broader concern about the potential abuse of power by the federal government. He feared that the federal judiciary would lead to citizens suing states in federal courts, and he predicted that the president would use the pardon power corruptly. Additionally, he believed that the Senate was too powerful and that Congress's legislative and "inquisitorial powers" were too broad. These concerns led him to propose amendments to the Constitution, such as limiting federal courts to matters of international law, maritime issues, and suits involving multiple states.

Mason's opposition to federal control of militias and his other concerns about the Constitution were not without impact. He played a constructive role in pointing out perceived flaws in the document and recommending amendments. His ideas influenced important American documents, including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. While his relationship with George Washington suffered due to their differing views on the Constitution, Mason remained on good terms with other Anti-Federalists and supporters of the Constitution, such as James Monroe, Jefferson, Madison, and John Marshall.

Frequently asked questions