
The Fourteenth Amendment has been used to incorporate parts of the Bill of Rights, which comprises the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, limits what state governments may do, and its Due Process Clause has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to impose on the states many of the Bill of Rights' limitations. This process, known as incorporation, has been used to selectively incorporate parts of the Bill of Rights into the Fourteenth Amendment, making them applicable to states as well as the federal government.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Name of the doctrine | Incorporation doctrine |
| What it applies to | Parts of the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (known as the Bill of Rights) |
| How it applies | Through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment |
| When it applies | When applying parts of the Bill of Rights to States |
| Who uses it | The Supreme Court |
| What it does | Makes the Bill of Rights enforceable against state governments |
| What it doesn't do | It does not incorporate the entire Bill of Rights |
| What it affects | The power of the states and the federal government |
| What it protects | Individual rights |
Explore related products
$9.99 $9.99
What You'll Learn

The Fourteenth Amendment and the expansion of civil rights protections
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, passed by Congress on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868, was a significant development in the expansion of civil rights protections. This amendment addressed citizenship rights and equal protection under the law, ensuring that all persons born or naturalized in the United States were granted citizenship, including formerly enslaved people.
One of the key provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment was its role in extending liberties and rights outlined in the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved individuals. This marked a shift from the pre-amendment era, where the Supreme Court had ruled in Barron v. Baltimore (1833) that the Bill of Rights only constrained the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause played a pivotal role in incorporating parts of the Bill of Rights and making them applicable to the states.
Section 1 of the amendment is particularly noteworthy for its role in defining citizenship and protecting civil rights. It ensured that no state could abridge or deny the civil rights guaranteed by the amendment. This section was pivotal in countering discriminatory Black Codes enacted by southern states, which restricted the rights of African Americans. The Citizenship Clause overruled the Dred Scott decision, which had denied citizenship to African Americans.
The Fourteenth Amendment also empowered Congress to enforce its provisions, leading to significant civil rights legislation in the 20th century, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The amendment has been frequently litigated, forming the basis for landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which prohibited racial segregation in public schools, and Loving v. Virginia (1967), which ended interracial marriage bans.
Despite its importance, it is essential to acknowledge that the Fourteenth Amendment did not single-handedly protect the rights of Black citizens during the Reconstruction era. Citizens had to petition, initiate court cases, and advocate for their rights, laying the groundwork for more significant changes in the 20th century.
Who Can Propose Amendments to Maryland's Constitution?
You may want to see also

The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution, passed in 1868, addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law at all levels of government. It was a response to issues affecting freed slaves following the Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment has been interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court in various landmark cases over the years, shaping the understanding of individual rights and protections.
One of the key aspects of the Fourteenth Amendment is the Due Process Clause, which guarantees that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Early interpretations of the Due Process Clause by the Supreme Court focused on evaluating the procedures for depriving someone of property rights. In cases like Mathews v. Eldridge (1976), the Court considered the nature of the property right, the adequacy of the procedure, and the potential burdens on the state.
The Fourteenth Amendment also includes the Privileges or Immunities Clause, which prohibits states from denying any citizen the "privileges and immunities" of citizenship. While the Supreme Court initially foreclosed on this interpretation in the Slaughter-House Cases (1873), it later applied it in cases like Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago (1897) to incorporate the Bill of Rights against the states. This began a process of incorporation, where the Supreme Court extended the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states, ensuring that individual rights were protected at both the federal and state levels.
Another important provision of the Fourteenth Amendment is the Equal Protection Clause, which was written to constitutionalize the anti-discrimination principles of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Supreme Court has applied this clause in numerous cases, such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which prohibited racial segregation in public schools, and Loving v. Virginia (1967), which ended interracial marriage bans. The Equal Protection Clause has also been central to the evolution of Title IX, prohibiting sex discrimination in educational institutions receiving federal funding.
The Fourteenth Amendment has also been interpreted by the Supreme Court to protect unenumerated rights, which are not explicitly listed in the Constitution. Through "substantive due process" jurisprudence, the Court has elevated privacy to a fundamental right, influencing cases related to contraceptive sales, consensual sex, and same-sex marriage. Additionally, in Roe v. Wade (1973), the Court recognised a substantive due process right to abortion, which was later overturned in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022).
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment has significantly shaped the understanding and protection of individual rights in the United States. Through cases involving due process, equal protection, incorporation, and unenumerated rights, the Court has expanded the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment, ensuring that the liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights are extended to all citizens, including those previously denied them, such as formerly enslaved people and ethnic minorities.
Death Penalty: Constitutional Amendments Explained
You may want to see also

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment, passed by Congress on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868, was a pivotal moment in extending the liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people. This amendment played a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of citizens, ensuring that states could not arbitrarily deprive individuals of their life, liberty, or property.
Another important interpretation is "substantive due process," which holds that there are certain fundamental rights that the government cannot infringe upon, even if it provides procedural protections. This interpretation recognises that some liberties are so essential that they cannot be violated without a compelling reason, regardless of the procedural safeguards in place.
In conclusion, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment serves as a critical safeguard against government overreach, ensuring that individuals' rights to life, liberty, and property are protected. Through its interpretations by the Supreme Court, this clause has expanded civil rights protections and provided a foundation for challenging state actions that infringe upon the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Amendment History: The 19th Amendment's Adoption
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$94.95 $99.95

The incorporation of the Bill of Rights
The United States Constitution's first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were initially only binding on the federal government. The Supreme Court held in 1833 that the Bill of Rights did not place limitations on the authority of state and local governments.
However, this changed with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, which was ratified in the post-Civil War era to abolish slavery and limit what state governments could do. The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to "incorporate" parts of the Bill of Rights, making them enforceable against state governments. This process, known as "incorporation," has been used by the Supreme Court to define rights for the entire union, increasing federal power at the expense of state power.
The Supreme Court has rejected the notion of "total incorporation," instead opting for a "selective incorporation" approach, where it decides on a case-by-case basis whether a right safeguarded against federal government action also applies to state government action. The Court has used the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause to strike down many state laws and incorporate specific rights from the Bill of Rights, such as the right to peaceably assemble and petition for redress of grievances.
The Fourteenth Amendment has vastly expanded civil rights protections, and it is cited in more litigation than any other amendment to the Constitution. The process of incorporation has led to a greater emphasis on the individual rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, rather than the natural rights not listed in it.
Religious Teaching Laws: Constitutional Amendments Explained
You may want to see also

The impact of the Fourteenth Amendment on federal and state powers
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted on July 9, 1868, significantly impacted the balance of power between the federal government and the states. One of the key provisions of this amendment was the expansion of citizenship rights and equal protection under the law at all levels of government. This amendment was a response to issues affecting freed slaves following the Civil War, and it had a profound impact on the relationship between the federal government and the states.
Prior to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court held in Barron v. Baltimore (1833) that the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government and did not restrict the actions of state and local governments. However, with the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court began interpreting the amendment to "incorporate" portions of the Bill of Rights, making them enforceable against state governments. This process, known as incorporation, applied both substantively and procedurally, and it gave rise to the concept of reverse incorporation, where state law is used to fill in the gaps when the Supreme Court has not previously considered an issue.
The Fourteenth Amendment also granted Congress the power to enforce the amendment's provisions through appropriate legislation, which allowed the federal government to limit state sovereign immunity. This meant that private individuals could seek federal injunctions against state officials to prevent the enforcement of unconstitutional laws, further strengthening the federal government's ability to hold state officials accountable to constitutional standards.
In addition, the Fourteenth Amendment addressed the process of readmitting Confederate states to Congress by authorising federal prosecutors to remove those disqualified by the Insurrection Clause from their political offices. This provision demonstrated the expanded authority of the federal government in ensuring compliance with the amendment's requirements.
While the Fourteenth Amendment expanded federal power in certain areas, it is important to note that there were limitations. For example, the Supreme Court explicitly rejected the incorporation of certain clauses, such as the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause and the Seventh Amendment. Additionally, the amendment's impact on protecting the rights of Black citizens was limited, and it failed to extend the Bill of Rights to the states as originally intended by some of its authors.
Amendment Impact: Voting Rights for 18-Year-Olds
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The Incorporation Doctrine is a constitutional doctrine that applies parts of the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (known as the Bill of Rights) to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. It protects certain rights against infringement by the federal government.
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". This clause has been used to strike down many state laws and incorporate parts of the Bill of Rights.
Selective incorporation refers to the process by which the Supreme Court selectively incorporates rights that it considers fundamental and essential to due process, rather than incorporating an entire amendment at once.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, differs from previous amendments as it limits the powers of state governments. It has been used to expand civil rights protections and is cited in more litigation than any other amendment.


![Act of Incorporation and Amendments, Constitution, Regulations and List of Members of the St. James' Club of Montreal 1900 [Leather Bound]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/617DLHXyzlL._AC_UY218_.jpg)





















![Due Process is Law | Bumper Sticker or Car Magnet | Sarcastic Humorous Black Magnetic Bumper Sticker for Trucks Cars [7.5x3.75]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61aKSNeEVEL._AC_UL320_.jpg)