Compromise: The Constitution's Foundation

The ratification of the US Constitution was a long and complex process, marked by vigorous debate and compromise. The Articles of Confederation, which had previously governed the US, had proven insufficient, particularly in trade, commerce, and defense. It became clear that a stronger, more centralized government was required. The Constitutional Convention, presided over by George Washington, addressed these issues, and the final draft of the Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by 39 of the 55 delegates. The Constitution promised a stronger central government with three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. However, the ratification process sparked intense national debate between Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. Key figures such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay led lobbying efforts for votes in favor of ratification, producing The Federalist Papers to explain and defend the proposed government. Despite opposition from several states, the Constitution was gradually ratified, with Delaware being the first state to do so on December 7, 1787. The process of ratification continued until May 29, 1790, when Rhode Island became the last state to ratify the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$12.95 $22

Miracle At Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention May - September 1787

$10.55 $19.99

The Constitutional Convention: A History Just for Kids

$13.99 $13.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

The inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation required unanimity for ratification, which proved difficult to achieve. Between 1781 and 1787, several amendments were proposed to strengthen the powers of Congress, but none were adopted due to the unanimous ratification requirement. This led to a deadlock along sectional lines between the North and South. The Articles also lacked a mechanism to enforce laws, and the large majorities required for ratification often resulted in stalemates.

The inadequacies of the Articles became increasingly apparent, and in 1786, Charles Pinckney of South Carolina proposed that Congress appoint a committee to amend them. However, the Convention soon abandoned this project and instead focused on creating a new constitution. The Constitutional Convention, held in 1787, aimed to address the weaknesses of the central government under the Articles. The delegates to the Convention, including George Washington, sought to create a stronger national government with more specific powers, particularly in foreign affairs.

The ratification process of the new Constitution was not smooth, with intense debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued for the need for a stronger central government. They believed the Constitution provided a necessary framework for an effective government capable of unifying the nation and protecting against foreign threats. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, opposed the concentration of power in the federal government and criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights. Despite the opposition, the Constitution was gradually ratified by the required nine out of thirteen states, with New Hampshire becoming the decisive ninth state in June 1788.

The Federalist Papers

The authors of The Federalist Papers initially attempted to hide their identities due to Hamilton and Madison's involvement in the constitutional convention. However, their identities were eventually discerned, and after Hamilton's death in 1804, a list emerged claiming he had written two-thirds of the essays. Modern scholarship has since attributed 51 articles to Hamilton, 29 to Madison, and five to Jay.

The promise of a stronger central government

The ratification of the US Constitution was a long and complex process, with the promise of a stronger central government being a key factor in its eventual adoption.

The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, had created a loose confederation of sovereign states. However, it soon became clear that a stronger, more centralized government was needed for future stability. The Articles proved insufficient, particularly in trade, commerce, and defense. The federal government faced challenges in conducting foreign policy, as it lacked the power to pass or enforce laws.

The Constitutional Convention, presided over by George Washington, met in Philadelphia from May to September 1787. The convention addressed the weaknesses of the central government under the Articles of Confederation. Washington, though against political parties and divisions, supported ratification, believing that the current government was so powerless that it risked losing the support of the people or the participation of states in the Confederation Congress.

The delegates to the convention wanted the new constitution to be ratified by a majority of states and citizens. They decided that nine states would be needed for ratification, ensuring that a majority of citizens was represented. This ratification process was designed to demonstrate that the new constitution was established by the will of the people, rather than political elites.

The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued for the necessity of a stronger central government. They believed the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays, were a key tool in articulating these arguments and addressing concerns.

The ratification process sparked an intense national debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists raised concerns about the concentration of power in the federal government and the lack of a Bill of Rights. However, Federalists secured ratification by promising to support amendments, such as the Bill of Rights, once the Constitution was adopted.

The first state to ratify was Delaware on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify, ensuring the Constitution would take effect. The Constitution came into effect in 1789, and the machinery of state was designed, marking a significant step towards a stronger central government.

Explore related products

Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence: Senator Rand Paul, Delegates of The Constitutional Convention

$2.99 $2.99

Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787

$18 $18

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$28.49 $32.5

The Selling of the Constitutional Convention: A History of News Coverage (Culture)

$44.73 $52

Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention

$26 $26

The Constitutional Convention: Core Documents

$0.99

The role of George Washington

George Washington played a crucial role in the ratification of the US Constitution. In 1787, Washington's concerns about the potential disintegration of the nation under the Articles of Confederation prompted him to serve as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. He was unanimously elected as the president of the convention, a role in which he guided 55 state delegates through four months of intense debate.

Washington rarely participated in the debates, but he ensured that delegates remained open to compromise. His commanding presence and support were key to achieving a consensus and producing the final document. Washington's endorsement of the framework for a stronger national government, with three branches, was significant. He believed that the country required a more unified and centralised government, with the power to make war, peace, and treaties, and to levy taxes and regulate commerce.

Washington's influence extended beyond the convention. He actively supported the ratification process, corresponding with political leaders across the nation to urge them to ratify the Constitution. He sent copies of the document to key figures, including Thomas Jefferson and the Marquis de Lafayette, seeking their backing. He also wrote letters to individuals like Charles Carter, expressing his opinion on the Constitution and emphasising the importance of a strong union.

Washington's support for the Constitution was widely known and had a strong influence on others. Federalists, in particular, used his image and signature on the document to promote ratification. Many assumed he would become the first president under the new Constitution, which further encouraged delegates to propose strong executive powers. Washington himself agreed to serve as president, believing it would help cement support for the new government.

In summary, George Washington's role as the president of the Constitutional Convention, his guidance during the debates, and his endorsement of the final document were pivotal in achieving ratification. His active support for ratification across the states and his influence as a respected leader further contributed to the establishment of the US Constitution.

The need for a majority of states and citizens

The ratification of the US Constitution was a complex and challenging process. The Articles of Confederation, which had previously governed the country, had proven insufficient, particularly in trade, commerce, and defence. It became clear that a stronger, more centralized government was needed. The Articles of Confederation required unanimous ratification by state legislatures, which was difficult to achieve and led to deadlocks.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention wanted the new constitution to be ratified by a majority of both states and citizens. They added the requirement that nine out of the thirteen states would need to ratify the document, ensuring that a majority of citizens were represented. This approach was designed to demonstrate that the new constitution was established by the will of the people, rather than a few political elites.

The ratification process sparked a national debate between Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, known as Federalists, led the lobbying efforts for votes in favour of ratification. They produced "The Federalist Papers," a series of 85 essays published in newspapers nationwide, explaining and defending the proposed government. The essays addressed people's fears about a federal government and argued for the need for a stronger central government.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, raised concerns about the concentration of power in the federal government and the lack of a Bill of Rights. They believed the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties and states' rights. Despite the opposition, the Constitution gained enough support, and on June 21, 1788, with New Hampshire becoming the ninth state to ratify, the requirement for ratification was met.

The process of achieving ratification by a majority of states and citizens was crucial to the establishment of the new Constitution. It ensured that the will of the people was represented and that the government had the legitimacy and support needed to function effectively.

Frequently asked questions