Constitutional Clause: Exploring Actions And Impacts

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the source of an array of constitutional rights, including procedural protections, individual rights listed in the Bill of Rights, and fundamental rights not specifically enumerated elsewhere in the Constitution. The Clause guarantees due process of law before the government may deprive someone of life, liberty, or property. This means that the government must follow the law and adhere to certain procedures before depriving an individual of these rights. The interpretation and application of the Due Process Clause have evolved over time, with the Supreme Court elaborating on its understanding and making decisions regarding issues such as the regulation of firearms, state taxation, and business contracts.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$245.32 $359

Great Cases in Constitutional Law

$44 $47

The Constitutional Value of Sunset Clauses: An historical and normative analysis

$47.11 $61.99

Equal Citizenship, Civil Rights, and the Constitution: The Original Sense of the Privileges or Immunities Clause (Routledge Research in Constitutional Law)

$55.16 $72.99

The New Constitutional Order

$50 $50

Procedural due process

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution guarantee due process to all persons located within the United States. The Amendments, also known as the Due Process Clauses, protect individuals when the government deprives them of life, liberty, or property, and limit the government's arbitrary exercise of its powers. The U.S. Constitution requires two types of due process: procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures the government must follow in criminal and civil matters.

The criteria for determining whether the due process requirements have been met depend on whether the particular government action concerns a civil or criminal proceeding. In civil contexts, the courts utilize a balancing test between private interests, the government's public interest, and the possibility of the government procedure's erroneous deprivation of private interest in evaluating government conduct. In criminal procedures, the court looks to whether the procedure the government has adopted is offensive to the notion of fundamental fairness for the due process analysis.

Courts evaluate the procedure for depriving someone of a "new property" right by considering the nature of the property right, the adequacy of the procedure compared to other procedures, and the burdens that other procedures would impose on the state. In most cases, the fundamental fairness of the government's actions is examined to determine whether the government has met the requirements for due process.

Individual rights

One of the most important individual rights is the right to freedom of speech and expression. This right allows individuals to express their thoughts, beliefs, and ideas without fear of censorship or retaliation. It also encompasses the freedom of the press, ensuring that media organizations can report and publish information without government interference.

Another key aspect of individual rights is the protection of religious freedom. This includes the right to hold and practice religious beliefs or none at all without discrimination or persecution. It also guarantees the freedom to assemble and associate with others who share similar beliefs and to participate in religious activities and ceremonies.

Furthermore, economic and property rights are also protected under individual rights. These rights guarantee the freedom to own and use property, as well as the right to engage in economic activities and pursue livelihood opportunities. This includes protections against unreasonable government interference in business activities and the right to enter into contracts.

In summary, individual rights are a fundamental aspect of a free and just society, guaranteeing the freedoms and protections that allow citizens to live their lives according to their own choices and beliefs, free from unreasonable interference or discrimination. These rights are enshrined in the Constitution and other laws, ensuring that they are upheld and protected for all citizens.

Substantive due process

The Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. It prohibits the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property" by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law. The Fifth Amendment applies to federal action, and the Fourteenth Amendment applies to state action.

Critics of substantive due process decisions argue that these liberties ought to be left to the politically accountable branches of government. They assert that the term "substantive due process" is an oxymoron, as the Due Process Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of "substantive" rights; it simply requires that the government follow the law.

The interpretation and application of substantive due process continue to be a subject of controversy and debate among justices, with some seeking to extend it, some to scale it back, and others to eliminate it altogether.

Explore related products

The Federal Impeachment Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis

$11.99 $17.99

Contemporary Perspectives On Constitutional Interpretation

$52.43 $68.99

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition

$49.99 $49.99

A Conflict of Principles: The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan

$52.24 $54.99

A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before

$13.77 $22.95

The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment: Its Letter and Spirit

$21.34 $22.95

Congress's enumerated powers

The US Constitution enumerates, or lists, the powers of Congress that it can exercise to make laws to govern the country. These enumerated powers are contained in Article I, Section 8, and include the following:

• The power to lay and collect taxes, including taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states.
• The power to borrow money and pay debts.
• The power to regulate commerce with states, other nations, and Native American tribes.
• The power to coin money.
• The power to establish post offices.
• The power to protect patents and copyrights.
• The power to establish lower courts.
• The power to declare war and raise and support an Army and Navy.
• The power to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.
• The power to make rules concerning captures on land and water.

In addition to these explicit powers, Congress also has implied powers that are derived from the enumerated powers. For example, Congress has the power to raise an army, which implies the power to create an air force. The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, gives Congress the authority to create any laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers. This clause has been interpreted broadly, allowing for an expansion of Congressional power.

The right to bear arms

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which was adopted in 1791 and consists of the first ten amendments to the US Constitution. The right to bear arms is a unique feature of the US Constitution, and it has been a topic of intense debate and controversy.

The amendment's wording suggests that the right to bear arms is linked to the need for a "well-regulated militia," which was important during the early days of the United States when the country lacked a standing army. This has led to differing interpretations, with some arguing that the right to bear arms is primarily about the collective right of states to maintain militias, while others contend that it also includes an individual right to own and carry weapons for self-defence or other purposes.

Over time, the interpretation of this right has evolved through legislative action and court rulings. For instance, the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968 imposed restrictions on certain types of firearms and prohibited specific individuals, such as convicted felons, from possessing guns. However, the Supreme Court has also issued rulings that affirmed an individual's right to own firearms, such as in the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) case. In this case, the Court struck down a Washington, D.C. ban on handgun possession, recognising an individual right to keep a firearm for self-defence within the home.

Frequently asked questions