Presidential Roles: Two Unconstitutional Powers Explored

what 2 presidential roles do not come from the constitution

The President of the United States has a wide range of roles and responsibilities, some of which are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. While the Constitution does grant the President federal executive power and authority over foreign affairs, it does not cover all aspects of the role. Two notable examples of presidential roles that are not explicitly defined in the Constitution are the power to assert executive privilege and the authority to appoint staff. The former was established as a precedent by George Washington, and the Supreme Court has since ruled on its limitations. The latter, which includes the appointment of aides, advisers, and assistants, is also not subject to Senate review.

cycivic

The President's role as Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces

As Commander-in-Chief, the president is ultimately responsible for the safety and security of the United States and its citizens. This role comes with significant powers, including the authority to launch, direct, and supervise military operations, order or authorize the deployment of troops, and unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The president also has the power to form military policy, in conjunction with the Department of Defense and Homeland Security.

The exact degree of authority granted to the president as Commander-in-Chief has been the subject of much debate throughout American history. While the president has broad powers, the constitutional ability to declare war is vested solely in Congress. The president does, however, have the duty and power to repel sudden attacks and act in emergencies. In these situations, the president, as Commander-in-Chief, can direct the armed forces for any purpose specified by Congress.

The operational command of the Armed Forces is delegated from the president to the Department of Defense and is typically exercised through its secretary. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the combatant commands also assist with operations, as outlined in the presidentially-approved Unified Command Plan (UCP).

President Clinton, for instance, used his role as Commander-in-Chief to address conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo. He supported peace talks and, when necessary, authorized military force to ensure the safety of the United States and its allies.

cycivic

The President's power to launch nuclear weapons

The President of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces and has the authority to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. This power is not derived from the Constitution but from the National Security Act of 1947 and its 1949 amendments, which placed the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force under the "authority, direction, and control" of the secretary of defence. The president has plenary power to launch, direct, and supervise military operations, including the deployment of troops and the formation of military policy with the Department of Defense and Homeland Security.

While the president has the sole authority to launch nuclear weapons, there have been concerns about the lack of checks and balances in this process. The president's power to launch nuclear weapons is not subject to review or approval by Congress or any other body, and there are no constraints on their authority to do so. This means that the president can order a nuclear strike without Congressional authorization, as allegedly occurred when President Richard Nixon, in an intoxicated state, ordered a nuclear strike that was ignored and never carried out.

The absence of constraints on the president's power to launch nuclear weapons has led to calls for reform and the proposal of various solutions. Some have suggested requiring consensus among the president, vice president, and speaker of the House of Representatives, while others have proposed involving multiple parties in the decision-making process, such as national security advisers or Congress. However, the involvement of Congress in this decision has been debated, with some arguing that it would violate the separation of powers principle and that national security decisions should not be subject to political games.

Despite these concerns, the president's power to launch nuclear weapons remains unchecked. The current system, known as the NC3 system, provides checks on the authority to use weapons at every level below the president but does not limit the president's authority. This paradox highlights a troubling aspect of US strategy, where the ultimate decider of nuclear weapons use has unfettered power, even in the absence of an apparent emergency.

cycivic

The President's ability to grant reprieves and pardons

The President of the United States has the power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment. This power is derived from Article II of the United States Constitution, which outlines the executive powers of the President.

The ability to grant reprieves and pardons is a significant aspect of the President's role as it allows them to exercise clemency and mercy in certain situations. A reprieve is a temporary relief from punishment, often used to delay an execution or postpone a sentence. On the other hand, a pardon is an act of forgiveness that eliminates the legal consequences of a crime. It can be granted before or after a conviction and may even be used to overturn a conviction or reduce a sentence.

The President's power to grant reprieves and pardons is not without limitations. While the President can grant pardons for federal offences, the power to pardon for state offences rests with the governor of each state. Additionally, the President cannot pardon themselves or grant pardons in cases of impeachment.

Throughout history, the use of reprieves and pardons by presidents has been a controversial topic. Some notable examples include President George Washington's pardon of participants in the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794, and President Gerald Ford's controversial pardon of former President Richard Nixon for his role in the Watergate scandal.

The power to grant reprieves and pardons is an important tool for the President to correct injustices, show mercy, and uphold the fair administration of justice. However, its use is carefully scrutinized to ensure it is exercised responsibly and in the best interests of the nation.

cycivic

The President's power to appoint staff

The President of the United States is the country's commander-in-chief and has the power to launch, direct and supervise military operations, order or authorise the deployment of troops, and unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The President also has the power to make treaties, which need to be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, and is responsible for foreign affairs functions not granted to Congress or shared with the Senate.

Article II of the U.S. Constitution designates the President as the Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Navy, and Militia of the United States. The President is also empowered to make appointments within the federal government, with the advice and consent of the Senate. This includes the appointment of ambassadors, public ministers and consuls, Supreme Court judges, and other officers of the United States.

cycivic

The President's role in passing legislation

The President has the power to convene or adjourn Congress. They can summon both Houses into extra or special sessions for legislative purposes, and they can call on the Senate alone for the consideration of nominations and treaties. The President's power to adjourn the Houses has never been exercised. The President can also recommend measures to Congress for their consideration and communicate to them in precise terms. However, the President is not obliged to impart information that they believe should be withheld in the public interest.

The President is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces and all federalized Militia. They have the power to launch, direct, and supervise military operations, deploy troops, and form military policy. However, the power to declare war is vested in Congress.

The President can make suggestions about new laws and direct officials on how to interpret the law (subject to judicial review). They can also grant reprieves and pardons.

Once a bill has passed both Houses of Congress, the President considers it. They can approve the bill and sign it into law, or they can veto it. If the President vetoes a bill, Congress can override the veto, and the bill becomes law. However, if the President does not sign off on a bill and Congress is no longer in session, the bill is pocket-vetoed by default, and Congress cannot override this.

Frequently asked questions

Written by
Reviewed by

Explore related products

Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment