Wwii Japanese Internment: Unconstitutional Incarceration?

The incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II is considered one of the greatest constitutional injustices in American history, with over 110,000 people of Japanese ancestry forcibly relocated to isolated camps and imprisoned behind barbed wire. This decision, made by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, was based on unfounded fears of Japanese Americans turning against the United States and was fueled by racism and war hysteria. The constitutionality of these actions was challenged in court, with the Supreme Court ultimately upholding the removals under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The impacts of this race-based trauma have been far-reaching, with Japanese Americans experiencing healing at individual, group, and community levels.

Explore related products

Japanese American Incarceration: The Camps and Coerced Labor during World War II (Politics and Culture in Modern America)

$29.99 $39.95

The Literature of Japanese American Incarceration

$12.4 $20

Japanese American Incarceration (21st Century Skills Library: Racial Justice in America: AAPI Histories)

$14.21

Un-American: The Incarceration of Japanese Americans During World War II: Images by Dorothea Lange, Ansel Adams, and Other Government Photographers

$40 $49.95

Seen and Unseen: What Dorothea Lange, Toyo Miyatake, and Ansel Adams's Photographs Reveal About the Japanese American Incarceration

$12.88 $21.99

Only What We Could Carry: The Japanese American Internment Experience

$15.19 $28

The US Supreme Court's ruling

The incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II was a result of Executive Order 9066, issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942. The order authorized military commanders to forcibly remove all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast and relocate them to "relocation centers" further inland. This resulted in the incarceration of approximately 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, two-thirds of whom were US citizens.

The constitutionality of the incarceration was challenged by three Japanese-American citizens: Gordon Hirabayashi, Fred Korematsu, and Mitsuye Endo. In its 1944 decision, the US Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the removals under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States avoided the issue of incarcerating US citizens without due process and focused on the validity of the exclusion orders. On the same day, the Court ruled in Ex parte Endo that a loyal citizen could not be detained, leading to the release of Endo and others from the camps.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Korematsu v. United States has been widely criticized and, in later years, deemed incorrect. In 1988, Congress passed the Civil Liberties Act, which officially apologized for the incarceration and provided $20,000 in reparations to each surviving individual who had been detained. The law stated that the incarceration was based on "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership" and concluded that the exclusion and detention of Japanese Americans was "unjust and motivated by racial animus".

The incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II represents one of the greatest constitutional injustices in American history, fueled by racism and war hysteria. The imprisonment of innocent people based solely on their ancestry has had far-reaching consequences, and the healing process has been ongoing for multiple generations. The use of terms like concentration camp to describe the incarceration sites reflects the intense feelings and perspectives about what occurred during the war.

The Roosevelt administration's justification

In his speech to Congress, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared that the Pearl Harbor attack was "a date which will live in infamy." He urged the incarceration of Japanese Americans, citing the need to protect the country from potential acts of treason or espionage. This led to the issuance of Executive Order 9066 in February 1942, which authorized the Secretary of War and military commanders to evacuate all persons deemed a threat from the West Coast to internment camps, referred to as "relocation centers."

The Roosevelt administration argued that the incarceration was necessary to safeguard the nation from potential threats within its borders. They asserted that the presence of Japanese Americans on the West Coast posed a significant risk, given their proximity to strategic military areas. The administration's stance was influenced by intelligence reports suggesting that Japanese Americans had a stronghold on key sectors of the economy in Hawaii, further stoking fears of economic sabotage.

Additionally, the administration faced pressure from lobbyists and nativist groups who advocated for the removal of individuals of Japanese descent from the West Coast. These groups often represented competing economic interests and contributed to the growing anti-Japanese sentiment. The Leadership of the Japanese American Citizens League also advised the affected community to comply with the government's orders without protest, prioritizing what they believed to be the greater good.

It is important to note that the incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II has been widely recognized as a grave injustice fueled by racism and war hysteria. The U.S. government's actions violated the constitutional rights of Japanese Americans, and the Supreme Court later ruled that loyal citizens could not be detained, leading to their eventual release.

The economic impact

In Hawaii, the imprisonment of Japanese Americans had a particularly notable economic impact. Japanese Americans made up a significant portion of the workforce in several key sectors, including agriculture, transportation, and carpentry. According to intelligence reports, Japanese Americans held "a virtual stranglehold on several key sectors of the economy in Hawaii," and their removal could have potentially crippled the local economy. General Delos Carleton Emmons, the military governor of Hawaii, argued against the incarceration, emphasising the essential role of Japanese labour in rebuilding the defences destroyed at Pearl Harbor.

The removal of Japanese Americans from their homes and businesses also resulted in significant property and business losses. Many Japanese Americans lost their lands, farms, and economic institutions, which were often taken over by competing agricultural groups or businesses. The managing secretary of the Western Growers Protective Association, for example, reported substantial profits for growers and shippers following the removal of Japanese American competitors. The incarceration also led to limited compensation for those who lost their properties and businesses, often far less than the value of what they had originally owned.

The incarceration disrupted the education and employment opportunities for Japanese Americans. Over 4,000 students were allowed to leave the camps to attend college, and approximately 33,000 Japanese Americans served in segregated military units during WWII. However, the mass incarceration and removal disrupted the normalcy of their lives and affected their ability to pursue education and careers freely.

The economic consequences of imprisonment extended beyond the war years, with Japanese Americans experiencing long-term economic and psychological impacts. The incarceration resulted in a culture of silence and race-based trauma, affecting multiple generations. Japanese Americans faced challenges in healing and recovery, drawing upon psychotherapeutic, artistic, and legal efforts to seek acknowledgment and redress for the injustices they endured during World War II.

Explore related products

WE HEREBY REFUSE: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration

$18.55 $19.95

The Showgirl and the Writer: A Friendship Forged in the Aftermath of the Japanese American Incarceration

$16.95 $16.95

Lost and Found: Reclaiming the Japanese American Incarceration (Asian American Experience)

$19.41 $25.95

Collective Agency and Resistance during Japanese American Incarceration: The Amache Silk Screen Shop

$37.99

Moving Images: Photography and the Japanese American Incarceration (Asian American Experience)

$27

The Incarceration of Japanese Americans in the 1940s: Literature for the High School Classroom (THE NCTE High School Literature Series)

$14.99

The racial trauma

The imprisonment of Japanese Americans during World War II was a racially-motivated decision that violated several constitutional rights and resulted in long-lasting racial trauma for the community.

On February 19, 1942, ten weeks after the Japanese military bombed Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. This order authorized the removal of all persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast of the United States, regardless of citizenship status. The order was based on unfounded fears and suspicions that Japanese Americans might engage in acts of espionage or sabotage, despite a lack of evidence to support these claims. More than 110,000 Japanese Americans were forced to leave their homes and communities and live in isolated camps located in deserts and swamplands. They were imprisoned behind barbed wire fences, watched by armed guards, and endured harsh conditions for an average of two to four years.

The mass incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII represents a powerful case of race-based historical trauma. The community experienced significant losses, including properties, businesses, and limited compensation. The imprisonment also had a profound impact on the mental health and well-being of those affected, with many experiencing racial trauma that persisted long after the war ended. The children of Japanese Americans, known as the Nisei generation, faced a distinct set of challenges due to the generation gap created by the immigration ban of 1924. They navigated questions of loyalty and identity, with some choosing to enlist in the military to prove their allegiance to the United States.

The constitutionality of the forced relocation and incarceration of Japanese Americans was challenged by several individuals and organizations. Three Japanese-American citizens, Gordon Hirabayashi, Fred Korematsu, and Mitsuye Endo, took legal action against the government's actions. Hirabayashi and Korematsu initially received negative judgments, but Endo was eventually determined to be "loyal" and allowed to leave the internment camp. The Supreme Court's decision in Ex parte Endo ruled that loyal citizens could not be detained, marking a turning point in the release of Japanese Americans from incarceration.

The Japanese American community has engaged in healing and coping responses to address the racial trauma inflicted during WWII. Arts and humanities have played a significant role in community healing, with jazz musicians, writers, poets, plays, and films promoting engagement with the incarceration trauma. The imprisonment of Japanese Americans during WWII, based solely on their ancestry, represents a dark chapter in American history and a stark reminder of the consequences of racial discrimination and the violation of constitutional rights.

The terminology used

Some of the terms used to describe the forced removal and incarceration include “detention”, “confinement”, “evacuation”, “exclusion”, “imprisonment”, “incarceration”, “internment”, and “relocation”. The people who were subjected to these measures have been referred to as “evacuees”, “detainees”, “incarcerees”, “inmates”, “internees”, “non-aliens”, and “prisoners”.

The term “concentration camp” has also been used to describe the sites where Japanese Americans were held. Scholars and stakeholders agree that this term is accurate, as it refers to places where people are imprisoned due to their identity, rather than because they have committed any crimes. The Japanese American National Museum and American Jewish Committee issued a joint statement endorsing the use of "concentration camp" in this context.

The use of different terminology reflects the complex and controversial nature of the imprisonment of Japanese Americans during World War II. The choice of words can influence how the events are perceived and interpreted, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding the constitutionality and morality of the actions taken by the US government.

It is important to note that the terminology used can carry emotional weight and trigger intense feelings for those impacted by the imprisonment. The varying terms reflect the multifaceted nature of the historical events and the ongoing process of understanding, interpreting, and coming to terms with this difficult chapter in American history.

Frequently asked questions