Alien Enemies Act: Constitutional Or Unconstitutional?

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime law that permits the president to detain or deport citizens of an enemy nation without a hearing, based solely on their country of birth or citizenship. While it was enacted to prevent foreign espionage and sabotage during wartime, the Act has been criticised as unconstitutional, with opponents arguing that it violates individual liberties and can be abused in peacetime. The Act has been invoked three times during major conflicts, but its constitutionality remains a subject of debate, with some arguing that it grants the president too much discretionary power.

Explore related products

The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution (Witness to History)

$22 $22

Port of No Return: Enemy Alien Internment in World War II New Orleans

$23 $29.95

Alien Enemies and Property Rights Under the Trading With Enemy act ..

$24.95

Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism

$20.99

Supplemental Brief of the United States in Support of the Plenary Power of Congress Over Alien Enemies, and the Constitutionality of the Alien Enemy Act (Revised Statutes, Sections 4067-4070)

$24.95

An act for the sequestration of the property of alien enemies, adopted Auqust 30, 1861 1861 [Leather Bound]

$18.57

The Alien Enemies Act's constitutionality

The Alien Enemies Act, passed in 1798, is a wartime law that permits the president to detain or deport citizens of an enemy nation without a hearing, based solely on their country of birth or citizenship. While the Act has been defended as a necessary tool for national security, particularly in times of declared war, it has also been criticised as unconstitutional and vulnerable to abuse.

The Act grants the president substantial discretion in responding to threats posed by enemy aliens. It authorises the president, through proclamation, to direct the conduct towards alien enemies and establish regulations for their restraint, removal, and residence. This includes the power to apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove male natives, citizens, or subjects of a hostile nation above the age of fourteen who are within the United States and not naturalised. The Act was initially aimed at French and Irish immigrants during a time of anticipated war with France.

The constitutionality of the Alien Enemies Act centres on the interpretation of "invasion" and "predatory incursion." The Act can be invoked during a "declared war" or when a foreign government undertakes or threatens an "invasion" or "predatory incursion." While the Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, the president has the authority to act in response to sudden attacks. The Supreme Court and past presidents have acknowledged the Act as a wartime authority. However, the terms "invasion" and "predatory incursion" are subject to debate, with anti-immigration groups advocating for a broader interpretation to include unlawful migration.

The Act's constitutionality has been challenged due to concerns over individual liberties and civil rights. Critics argue that the Act violates constitutional rights, particularly during peacetime, as it can be used against immigrants who are lawfully present and show no signs of disloyalty. The Act has been invoked during major conflicts, such as the War of 1812 and World Wars I and II, resulting in detentions and expulsions based solely on ancestry.

Courts have a role in checking the executive's use of the Alien Enemies Act. In the case of Sterling v. Constantin, the Court held that the president's obligation to faithfully execute the law implies a permitted range of honest judgment. This suggests that proclamations of "invasion" or "predatory incursion" solely to unlock the Act's powers may fall short of the president's duty to act in good faith. Additionally, the Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case emphasised the role of all three branches in protecting individual liberties during conflicts. While courts can reject the Act's application, they often rely on the political question doctrine, avoiding intervention in matters of war and peace.

The Act's use in wartime

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime authority that allows the president to detain or deport the citizens of an enemy nation. The Act can be invoked via a Presidential Proclamation on two bases: firstly, when there is a declared war between the US and a foreign nation, and secondly, when there is an invasion or predatory incursion perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against US territory by a foreign power.

The Act has been invoked three times, each during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. In the first two instances, the Act was used to target German, Austro-Hungarian, and Japanese immigrants based solely on their ancestry. In the case of World War II, it was used to target Italian immigrants as well. The Act was also used after the cessation of hostilities in World Wars I and II. For example, the Wilson administration used the law to intern German and Austro-Hungarian immigrants until 1920, two years after the war ended.

In more recent times, President Trump invoked the Act to detain and deport alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. However, a federal judge in Texas ruled that the invocation was unlawful.

The Act has been criticised as outdated, dangerous, and vulnerable to abuse, especially in peacetime. While some anti-immigration politicians advocate for a non-literal reading of "invasion" and "predatory incursion" to include unlawful migration, this interpretation is at odds with legislative, presidential, and judicial practices. The courts have also been criticised for not rejecting the application of the Act.

The Act's use in peacetime

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime authority that allows the president to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an "enemy" nation. The Act can be invoked via a Presidential Proclamation on two bases: firstly, whenever there is a "declared war" between the US and a foreign nation, and secondly, when there is an "invasion or predatory incursion" by a foreign nation against the US.

The Act has been invoked three times, each during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. In the first two instances, the Act was used to detain and expel German and Austro-Hungarian immigrants, while in World War II, it was used to target German, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese, and Italian immigrants. The Act was also used after the cessation of World Wars I and II, and during World War I, it was invoked to intern immigrants.

Courts should reject any attempts to use the Act in peacetime and instead rely on existing immigration, criminal, and intelligence laws to address national security concerns. The Act's broad authority may violate constitutional rights, and its application in peacetime could lead to the detention and deportation of immigrants who have no ties to foreign belligerents and are lawfully present in the US.

The Act's constitutionality in peacetime is further complicated by the political question doctrine, which cautions courts against addressing issues within the executive's constitutional duties. However, the courts' failure to reject the migration-as-invasion theory sets a concerning precedent, suggesting that a president could potentially invoke the Act based on migrant "invasions."

Explore related products

Democratizing the Enemy: The Japanese American Internment

$37.95 $45

Report of All Proceedings Under the Trading With the Enemy Act During 1918 and to Feb. 15, 1919

$41.95

Trading With The Enemy Act: With The Report On The Act Submitted To The Senate By The Committee On Commerce

$29.95

Supplemental brief of the United States in support of the plenary power of Congress over alien enemies, and the constitutionality of the Alien enemy act (Revised statutes, sections 406 [Leather Bound]

$21.97

Counter-Espionage Laws of the United States: A Condensed Summary of the Amended Espionage and Sedition Act, the Trading-With-Enemy Act, the Sabatoge ... Act, the Alien Enemy Regulations, the Ar

$29.95

Control of Enemy Alien Civilians in Great Britain, 1914-1918 (Routledge Revivals)

$240 $58.99

The Act's use in the War of 1812

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime law that allows the president to detain or deport citizens of an enemy nation without a hearing, based solely on their country of birth or citizenship. The Act has been invoked three times, each during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II.

During the War of 1812, the United States was in conflict with Great Britain. The Act was used to detain and deport British citizens and natives who were within the United States and not naturalized. The Act allowed the government to target these individuals without providing them with legal recourse or due process. This was the first use of the Alien Enemies Act since its passage in 1798.

The Act was passed in anticipation of a potential war with France. At the time, the United States was on the brink of war with France, and the Act was intended to prevent foreign espionage and sabotage. The Fifth Congress, which passed the law, understood that noncitizens with connections to a foreign belligerent could be treated as prisoners of war under the rules of war.

The Alien Enemies Act authorises the president to act when there is a declared war or when a foreign government threatens or undertakes an "invasion" or "predatory incursion" against US territory. While the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, the president has the authority to respond to invasions or incursions. This distinction is important because it allows the president to act quickly and decisively in the face of an immediate threat, without needing to wait for congressional approval.

The Act's use during the War of 1812 demonstrates how it can be a powerful tool for the president to protect national security and take decisive action against enemy nationals during a time of conflict. However, it is important to note that the Act has also been criticised as a violation of individual liberties and a means to bypass conventional immigration law.

The Act's use in World Wars I and II

The Alien Enemies Act was invoked three times, each time during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II.

In World War I, President Woodrow Wilson invoked the act against nationals of the Central Powers. In 1918, an amendment to the act struck out the provision restricting the law to males. The Wilson administration defended the act in court, arguing that noncitizens with connections to a foreign belligerent could be treated as "prisoners of war" under the "rules of war under the law of nations."

In World War II, the law was invoked by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the bombing of Pearl Harbor. He issued presidential proclamations #2525 (Alien Enemies – Japanese), #2526 (Alien Enemies – German), and #2527 (Alien Enemies – Italian), authorising the apprehension, restraint, and removal of Japanese, German, and Italian foreigners. The law was also used as a legal authority for interning noncitizens of Japanese, German, and Italian descent, as well as the internment of U.S. citizens of Japanese descent under separate executive orders.

The last time the Alien Enemies Act was challenged in court was in 1948, three years after World War II ended. In Ludecke v. Watkins, the Supreme Court upheld President Harry S. Truman's extended reliance on the law, reasoning that the question of when a war terminates and wartime authorities expire is too "political" for judicial resolution. Truman continued to use the law for internment and deportations until 1951.

Frequently asked questions