Simone Lawson
The Philippines is an archipelago of about 7,641 islands, with a coastline that is the fifth-longest in the world. In recent years, the Filipino government has intensified its fight against terrorism, and counterterrorism operations have diminished the capacity of terrorist groups to operate within the country. However, there is still a threat of kidnapping and attacks by remaining militants, especially in Western Mindanao. The Philippines has also been facing land conflict and land-grabbing issues, with authorities offering large swathes of land to foreign companies and governments, leading to the violent eviction of farmers and local communities. This has fuelled tensions and conflicts, with some rebel groups adopting brutal responses and investors and landlords using violent intimidation methods. Civil society organisations (CSOs) and advocacy groups are working to include local communities in decision-making processes and ensure farmers' independence from large landholders.
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
Farmers are violently evicted by investors and landlords
Since 2007, the Philippine government has been offering large areas of land to foreign companies and governments, with the promise of new jobs and more efficient use of agricultural land. However, this has resulted in the violent eviction of farmers from the land they occupy.
The Philippine government has a history of attempting to reform land ownership to promote equitable distribution. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) was implemented in 1988 for a ten-year period to improve land distribution and productivity and farmers' self-reliance. Despite this, farmers continue to express discontent with the system, which continues to facilitate large-scale land leases.
The country's thriving civil society organisations (CSOs) have played a role in uniting communities and raising awareness to influence decision-makers. Farmers have also formed cooperatives to improve their economic opportunities and ensure their independence from large landholders.
However, the competition for land in the Philippines has intensified, and investors and landlords have resorted to violent intimidation methods to evict farmers. These tactics include destroying crops, burning houses, physical assaults, and even murders, allegedly perpetrated by investors and local authorities.
In one case, 16 farmers from Barangay Talomo, Sto. Tomas, Davao del Norte, were threatened with eviction from the land they were cultivating. They were given a short notice period of fifteen days to vacate the property, and the eviction was set to be implemented in August 2002. This dispute over land has left farmers struggling to earn a living and provide for their children.
The Money Behind Political Campaigns: Who Funds Them?
You may want to see also
Agrarian reforms are not well implemented
The Philippines has a history of agrarian reform efforts, with various laws and programmes implemented over the years to address land ownership issues and improve the situation of farmers. However, despite these efforts, it is widely acknowledged that agrarian reforms in the Philippines are not well implemented and have had limited success in reducing land inequalities and poverty in rural areas.
Since 2007, the Philippine government has been offering large areas of land to foreign companies and governments, leading to the eviction of farmers and increasing tensions. While several agrarian reforms supporting land redistribution have been issued, they have not been effectively implemented. This has resulted in forceful evictions and harassment of farmers to clear land for foreign investors.
One example of a recent agrarian reform effort is the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), implemented in 1988 for a ten-year period. CARP aimed to promote a more equitable distribution of land and improve productivity, income, and farmers' self-reliance. However, its success is debated, with some studies questioning its positive economic impact. Additionally, the CARP Extension with Reforms (CARPER), supported by the German Technical Cooperation Agency, was completed in 2014, but its effectiveness is still uncertain. While the government claims to have distributed 88% of the land under the programme, there are ongoing discussions about a third extension.
The weak implementation of agrarian reforms in the Philippines can be attributed to various factors, including conceptual differences, multiplicity of reform objectives and components, comprehensiveness of the reform, and the involvement of multiple implementing agencies. Additionally, landowner resistance, weak farmers' organisations, and violent responses from rebel groups like the New People's Army have hindered the success of these reforms.
To improve the implementation of agrarian reforms, legal reforms are essential. This includes addressing issues such as compensation for landowners and improving the transparency and inclusivity of decision-making processes. Additionally, strengthening farmers' cooperatives and civil society organisations (CSOs) can enhance farmers' independence and economic opportunities, contributing to reduced land inequalities.
Campaign Trail: An Insider's Political Journey
You may want to see also
Civil society organisations (CSOs) are working to include communities in decision-making
The Philippines has a large number of civil society organisations (CSOs) with strong links to government officials and skills in network capacity-building. These CSOs have been instrumental in the state's efforts to include local communities in the decision-making process. For example, in Palawan, the Coalition against Land Grabbing, a local NGO, gathered signatures to petition the Vice-Governor to prevent palm oil expansion on their island. This is just one of many initiatives across the country that are pushing back against land-grabbing and calling on decision-makers to reconsider large-scale projects.
CSOs have been effective in uniting communities and raising awareness to gain the attention of decision-makers. They have also helped farmers pool their resources and improve their economic opportunities, thereby reducing land inequalities in the country. Cooperatives, for instance, have been successful in ensuring farmers' independence from large landholders.
Public consultations at the national and regional levels have also improved transparency and given a voice to the different interests involved. However, legal reforms are still essential to improve the situation of farmers in the Philippines. While there have been successive attempts to reform land ownership throughout history, they have not achieved satisfactory results. The latest and most controversial attempt is the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), which was implemented in 1988 to promote a more equitable distribution of land and improve productivity, income, and farmers' self-reliance. Despite studies showing that the program had a positive impact on land ownership and poverty reduction, its success is still debated.
In conclusion, civil society organisations (CSOs) in the Philippines are working effectively to include communities in decision-making processes. They have helped to raise awareness, unite communities, and improve economic opportunities for farmers. However, more legal reforms are needed to address the ongoing land conflict in the country.
Donating to Political Campaigns: Your Money, Your Voice
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$11.49 $19.99
Landlords use coercive means to evict tenants
In the Philippines, landlords have been reported to use coercive means to evict tenants. This is part of a larger issue of land-grabbing in the country, where the government has been offering large areas of land to foreign companies and investors. This has led to the harassment and violent eviction of farmers and local communities.
Landlords and investing companies have employed violent intimidation methods to remove farmers from the land, including destroying crops, burning houses, physical assaults, and even arrests and murders. These actions are often carried out with the help of local public authorities and investors, who stand to gain from clearing the land for foreign investors.
The farmers and tenants being evicted are often from the poorest populations and are severely impacted by these land deals. Despite several agrarian reforms supporting land redistribution, they are not well implemented, and farmers do not benefit from secure land tenure. This has resulted in forceful evictions and frequent cases of harassment and violence.
To address this issue, various initiatives and advocacy groups have emerged to call for better communication, transparency, and inclusion in decision-making processes. For example, the Coalition against Land Grabbing, a local NGO in Palawan, gathered signatures to prevent palm-oil expansion on their island. Additionally, farmers are forming cooperatives to pool resources and improve their economic opportunities, reducing their dependence on large landholders.
Legal reforms are also essential to improve the situation. While the Philippine government has made attempts to reform land ownership, the results have often been unsatisfactory. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), implemented in 1988, aimed to promote more equitable land distribution and improve productivity and farmers' self-reliance. However, its success is still debated, and it has faced opposition from landowners.
Political Campaigns: A Business of Persuasion and Strategy
You may want to see also
Land grabbing is leading to violent conflicts
Land grabbing is a worldwide phenomenon that occurs when governments or private companies seize land, often to the detriment of local communities and farmers. This issue is particularly salient in the Philippines, where authorities have been offering large swathes of land to foreign companies and governments since 2007. The attractive investment policies implemented by the Philippine authorities have led to an influx of Asian governments and companies acquiring vast amounts of land for tourism, heavy industry, and agriculture.
The consequences of these land acquisitions have been dire for the poorest populations in the Philippines, who are severely impacted by land leases to foreign investors. Farmers, who do not benefit from secure land tenure, are often harassed and violently evicted from their land to make way for investors. This has fuelled tensions and led to violent conflicts. Investing companies and landlords have adopted violent intimidation methods, including the destruction of crops, house burnings, physical assaults, and arrests. In some extreme cases, farmers refusing to leave have been murdered, with the acts allegedly perpetrated by order of investors and local authorities.
The situation in the Philippines is not an isolated case. Land grabbing is leading to violent conflicts in other parts of the world as well. For example, in Cambodia, governmental seizures of land in favour of private businesses have affected more than half a million citizens since 2000. Land loss and the destruction of livelihoods have resulted in social and economic marginalization, with forced evictions and a lack of public consultation for families. Civil discontent has grown, and peaceful protests have been violently repressed by the government.
In Indonesia, increasing demand for palm oil for biofuels has led to drastic increases in land grabbing and deforestation. This has provoked strong resentment, and community resistance has resulted in casualties. Similarly, in Kenya's Tana River Delta, large-scale land acquisitions by domestic and foreign companies have reduced available pastures and farmland for local communities, leading to public protests and exacerbating existing land-use conflicts.
The global pressures on land are increasing and threatening millions of livelihoods, peace, and stability. Land degradation, fuelled by climate change and environmental pollution, is reducing the surface area available for growing crops. As a result, large-scale land acquisitions by domestic and transnational companies further diminish local communities' access to pastures and farmland, sparking clashes between state authorities and different communities.
Stop Political Texts: Regain Your Peace
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
This phrase is a quote from a speech made by Chinese President Xi Jinping. It refers to China's alleged disregard for diplomatic negotiations with the Philippines and its alleged intention to unilaterally seize territorial lands claimed by the Philippines in the South China Sea.
The quote is taken out of context from a longer speech and has been circulated online as a meme, often with altered or exaggerated wording to emphasize the perceived aggressive nature of the statement.
I am unable to comment on the official response from the Philippines as there is no information available on this particular topic. However, the quote has sparked discussions and reactions on social media platforms, with varying interpretations and responses to the perceived aggressive nature of the statement.
The statement, especially when taken out of context and circulated as a meme, can fuel tensions and shape public perceptions of the dispute. It may also influence how the involved countries approach diplomatic negotiations and territorial claims.
Without additional context or official statements clarifying the intent behind the phrase, it is challenging to accurately determine its direct impact on bilateral relations. However, such statements can contribute to public sentiment and potentially influence how citizens of each country view one another.
