Who Rules In A Constitutional Monarchy?

A constitutional monarchy is a system of government in which a monarch shares power with a constitutionally organized government. The monarch is the head of state, while the head of the government is typically the prime minister. The monarch's role is largely ceremonial and symbolic, and they must act on the advice of the government. While the monarch has limited powers, they still play an important part in the life of the nation, fulfilling representative and civic duties. The United Kingdom, Thailand, and Japan are examples of constitutional monarchies with a king or queen as the head of state.

Explore related products

The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding

$26 $26

The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy: European Monarchies Compared (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law)

$42.39 $44.95

Coronation: A History of the British Monarchy

$15.9 $34.99

Constitutional Monarchy of the Twenty-First Century

$125.45 $159

The Monarchy and the Constitution

$78 $78

The Canadian Kingdom: 150 Years of Constitutional Monarchy

$12.99 $25

The role of the king or queen in a constitutional monarchy

A constitutional monarchy is a form of monarchy in which the monarch exercises their authority in accordance with a constitution and is not the sole decision-maker. In this system, the monarch is a hereditary symbolic head of state who primarily performs representative and civic roles but does not hold executive or policy-making powers. The British Monarchy is an example of a constitutional monarchy, with the current monarch being King Charles III, who ascended the throne following the death of Queen Elizabeth II.

In addition to their formal duties, the king or queen in a constitutional monarchy also has a significant ceremonial and diplomatic role. They may host foreign dignitaries, receive ambassadors, and undertake official visits to other countries, fostering international relations. The monarch is also typically involved in various cultural and charitable activities, supporting local organizations, recognizing voluntary service, and promoting excellence in different fields.

While the monarch has limited direct political power in a constitutional monarchy, they still possess certain reserve powers and are often seen as a check on the executive branch. For example, the monarch may have the power to dissolve parliament or refuse a government request for an early election under specific conditions, as outlined in the Lascelles Principles. The monarch's role in appointing the prime minister and other ministers is also significant, even if it is largely done based on the conventions and the support of the legislative body.

It is important to note that the role of the king or queen in a constitutional monarchy can evolve over time. For instance, in the United Kingdom, the monarch's role has transformed from holding substantial power, with Queen Anne being the last to veto an Act of Parliament in 1708, to a more ceremonial and symbolic position today.

The difference between a constitutional monarchy and an absolute monarchy

A constitutional monarchy, also known as a limited monarchy, parliamentary monarchy, or democratic monarchy, is a form of monarchy in which the monarch exercises their authority in accordance with a constitution and is not the sole decision-maker. The monarch in a constitutional monarchy is a hereditary or elected figure who serves as the head of state and is bound by the constitution of their country. They mainly perform representative and civic roles, with limited powers, and do not exercise executive or policy-making power. Examples of constitutional monarchies include the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Sweden, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and Bhutan.

On the other hand, an absolute monarchy, also known as an undemocratic monarchy, grants the monarch supreme or absolute powers, making them the sole decision-maker in the country. Absolute monarchs are not legally bound and can rule by divine right, claiming that their authority comes from God, and they are above the law. They have complete control over the government and its people, including the economy, taxation, and spending. Absolute monarchies include countries like Saudi Arabia, Brunei, and Oman.

The main difference between a constitutional monarchy and an absolute monarchy lies in the powers and authorities vested in the monarch. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's powers are limited and regulated by a constitution, while in an absolute monarchy, the monarch holds absolute power and is not bound by any legal framework.

Historically, the emergence of constitutional monarchies can be traced to the 16th and 17th centuries when many European countries experimented with constitutional forms of government. Notable examples include the Glorious Revolution of 1688 in England, which restricted the powers of the monarchy with laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701. France also transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy with the French Constitution of 1791, although this was short-lived and ended with the establishment of the French First Republic in 1792.

In contrast, absolute monarchies have a long history, with the age of absolutism in the 17th and 18th centuries seeing absolute monarchs ruling most of Europe. Even earlier, Hawaii transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy in 1840 when King Kamehameha III promulgated the kingdom's first constitution.

Examples of constitutional monarchies

There are 43 constitutional monarchies in the world today, and more than a quarter of them are in Western Europe. The two most populous constitutional monarchies are in Asia. Here are some examples of constitutional monarchies:

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy, made up of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The monarch is the head of state, while an appointed prime minister leads the government in the form of the British Parliament. The Parliament is bestowed with all law-making powers and is composed of the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

Belgium

Belgium is a constitutional monarchy where the monarch formally appoints a representative to preside over the creation of a coalition government following a parliamentary election.

Norway

Norway is another example of a constitutional monarchy. Here, the King chairs special meetings of the cabinet. While the monarch is the nominal chief executive, they are bound by convention to act on the advice of the Cabinet.

Canada

Canada is a constitutional monarchy, with a similar system to the UK.

Japan

Japan is a constitutional monarchy and is the most populous constitutional monarchy in the world.

Liechtenstein

In Liechtenstein, the ruling monarch wields significant executive power, but they are not an absolute monarch and have limited de facto power.

Jordan

Jordan is another example of a constitutional monarchy.

Explore related products

The Monarchy According to the Charter

$33.95

Timeline of the British Monarchy

$20.79 $25.99

Abolish the Monarchy: Why we should and how we will

$14.5 $33.99

Canada's Constitutional Monarchy: An Introduction to Our Form of Government

$8.99 $32.99

Modern Monarchy: The British Royal Family Today

$43.53

A History of England 1689-1837

$1.99 $22.99

The history of constitutional monarchy in the United Kingdom

The United Kingdom is a democratic constitutional monarchy. The history of the UK's constitutional monarchy can be traced back to the Anglo-Saxon era and the multiple kingdoms that existed before the formation of England as a single polity in the late first millennium CE.

In the early fifth century, following the withdrawal of the Roman Empire from Britain, monarchies emerged in Scotland, with Kenneth MacAlpin viewed as the first king of a united Scotland. In England, the first form of constitution was enacted with the Magna Carta in 1215, which sought to impose constraints upon the monarch. In 1542, the Crown of Ireland Act granted English monarchs the title of King of Ireland.

In 1603, following the death of Elizabeth I, James VI of Scotland also became King of England, uniting the two crowns. This led to an attempt to introduce more assertive monarchical absolutism, but the reaction against this resulted in greater constitutional restraints and a stronger Parliament. During the Interregnum (1649-1660), the monarchy was abolished and replaced with various forms of republican government.

The Glorious Revolution of 1688 furthered the transition towards a constitutional monarchy, with the Bill of Rights of 1689 and its Scottish counterpart, the Claim of Right Act, curtailing the power of the monarchy and excluding Roman Catholics from the throne. The Act of Settlement of 1701 also played a role in restricting the monarchy.

In 1707, the kingdoms of England and Scotland merged to form the Kingdom of Great Britain, and in 1801, the Kingdom of Ireland joined, creating the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. The final transition to a constitutional monarchy occurred during the long reign of Queen Victoria, who succeeded King William IV. As a woman, Victoria could not rule Hanover, which only permitted male succession, thus ending the personal union between the UK and Hanover.

Today, the role of the British monarch is largely ceremonial, with the monarch serving as a symbolic head of state and performing representative and civic duties. The monarch's authority is regulated by the British constitution, and their powers, such as appointing the prime minister and declaring war, are exercised within established limits. The UK's current monarch is King Charles III, who ascended the throne in 2022 following the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II.

The future of constitutional monarchy

One of the key advantages of constitutional monarchy is the stability and continuity that it provides. The presence of a monarch as a symbolic head of state can offer a sense of tradition and unity, especially in countries with a long history of royal families. The monarch can serve as a figurehead that transcends political divisions and provides a sense of national identity. This was evident in the United Kingdom during the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, who was widely respected and seen as a stable presence during times of political upheaval.

Another advantage of constitutional monarchy is the potential for a monarch to act as a check and balance on the powers of the elected government. While the monarch may not have direct political power, they can still play a role in appointing or dismissing the prime minister, providing royal assent to bills passed by parliament, and ensuring that the government acts within the boundaries of the constitution. This can help to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual or party, thereby promoting a more balanced and democratic system.

However, critics of constitutional monarchy argue that it is inherently undemocratic to have a hereditary head of state who is not accountable to the people. They contend that the very existence of a royal family perpetuates inequality and privilege, and that the costs associated with maintaining the monarchy could be better spent on more pressing social and economic issues. In countries with a history of colonial rule, there are also calls to abolish the monarchy as a symbol of oppression and exploitation.

Ultimately, the future of constitutional monarchy will depend on the specific context and circumstances of each country. While some nations may choose to abolish the monarchy and establish a republic, others may find value in retaining the tradition and stability that a constitutional monarchy provides. The ongoing dialogue and debate surrounding this topic will shape the future of constitutional monarchy and its role in the modern world.

Frequently asked questions