Debt Incarceration: Is It Constitutional?

Debtors' prisons were abolished by federal law in the US in 1833. However, this did not put an end to the practice, as many states continued to incarcerate people for debt beyond the mid-19th century. Even today, it is still possible to be imprisoned due to unpaid debts in certain parts of the country. While it is not common, there are circumstances in which debt can lead to jail time. This is often related to contempt of court, where individuals are jailed for disobeying a court order or failing to show up for a court date. In some states, people can be jailed for failing to pay child support, while others may jail people for debt owed to the government, such as fines or court costs.

Explore related products

A Debt Against the Living: An Introduction to Originalism

$15.58 $28

The Glannon Guide to Constitutional Law: Powers and Liberties: Learning Constitutional Law Through Multiple-Choice Questions and Analysis (Glannon Guides)

$40 $66.95

Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice

$23.1 $27.95

The Debt Collector's Handbook: Collecting Debts, Finding Assets, Enforcing Judgments, and Beating Your Creditors

$169.95

Living Debt Free: Restoring Arizona’s Commitment to its Constitutional Debt Limit

$0.99

American Solvency: One Constitutional Amendment To Permanently Fix Much Of What Is Broken In American Government

$6.99

Debtors' prisons were abolished in the 1830s

Debtors' prisons, where people who were unable to pay off their debts were incarcerated and forced to work off their debts, were a common phenomenon in Western Europe until the mid-19th century. In the United States, debtors' prisons were abolished in the 1830s when the US Supreme Court ruled that jail time for debt was unconstitutional. Despite this, people across the country are still being incarcerated because they owe court debts. This is often justified by claiming that the incarceration is a result of "contempt" or failure to comply with a court order, rather than non-payment.

In certain states, creditors can request a Debtor's Examination, where the debtor must answer questions about their financial situation under oath. Failure to show up for this examination can result in a charge of contempt and potential jail time. Additionally, there are still nine US states without constitutional provisions prohibiting imprisonment for debt: Connecticut, Delaware, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Virginia, and West Virginia.

The term "debtors' prisons" is also used to describe situations where people are sentenced to jail for willfully failing to pay criminal fees or fines, such as traffic tickets or municipal infractions. This practice has been criticised for disproportionately impacting people of colour and perpetuating racial disparities. While it is illegal for debt collectors to threaten individuals with jail time, the reality is that the threat of incarceration for debt still looms large for many Americans, particularly those from marginalised communities.

Imprisonment for debt is unconstitutional and biased against people with lower incomes

Imprisonment for debt has been deemed unconstitutional in the United States since the 19th century, when debtors' prisons were abolished. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) prohibits debt collectors from threatening debtors with criminal prosecution or jail time. However, there are still ways that creditors can manipulate the system to indirectly result in jail time for debtors. This often involves creditors suing debtors and requesting a Debtor's Examination, where the debtor must answer questions about their financial situation under oath. If the debtor fails to appear for this examination or court dates, they can be found in contempt of court and face jail time.

While debtors cannot be imprisoned solely for their inability to pay a debt, they can be jailed for contempt of court if they fail to comply with court orders or appear for court dates related to their debt. This is a significant issue as it disproportionately affects people with lower incomes, who may not have the financial resources to pay their debts or navigate the legal system effectively. The threat of jail time further exacerbates the challenges faced by low-income individuals, creating a cycle of financial and legal difficulties.

The discretion afforded to courts in handling debt cases is crucial. Courts must consider a defendant's financial resources when deciding on sanctions such as jail time, fines, or other penalties. Without this consideration, courts may impose unnecessary prison terms, especially on defendants with limited financial means. The Bearden v. Georgia case sets a precedent by mandating that monetary obligations imposed by a court cannot be converted into imprisonment solely for non-payment without a special finding. This ensures that defendants are not punished for their poverty.

The constitutional protections against imprisonment for debt have some limitations. For instance, debtors who evade payment or commit fraud may be exempt from these protections. Additionally, certain monetary obligations, such as failure to pay child support or alimony, may fall outside the scope of these protections. Nevertheless, the overall trend in legal interpretation is to limit the use of imprisonment for debt, recognising its disproportionate impact on people with lower incomes.

In conclusion, imprisonment for debt is unconstitutional in the United States, and the legal system has evolved to recognise the inherent biases against people with lower incomes. While there are exceptions and complexities, the overarching principle is to protect debtors from incarceration solely due to their financial situation. This highlights a shift towards recognising the intersection of economic inequality and the justice system, striving for a more equitable approach to debt handling.

Debt collectors threatening jail time is illegal

Debt collectors can, however, file a lawsuit against debtors in state civil court to collect the money owed. If the lawsuit is successful, the judge can issue a court order requiring the debtor to pay. While debtors cannot be arrested or sentenced to prison for failing to pay off debt, they can be jailed for contempt of court if they do not show up for a court date or fail to obey a court order to make payments. This is a common tactic used by creditors to manipulate the system and put debtors in jail for consumer debt.

In some states, debtors may be allowed to make periodic payments on a debt, which can help them avoid jail time. Additionally, non-profit credit counselors can offer free or low-cost help to borrowers struggling with debt, providing tips on budgeting and negotiating with creditors.

It is important to note that there are certain situations where jail time can be a consequence of unpaid debt. For example, not paying income taxes or court-ordered child support payments can result in jail time if it is considered tax fraud or willful violation of a court order. However, debtors cannot be jailed solely for owing credit card debt, student loan debt, or other types of debt.

Explore related products

Moral Debt: Defending a New Account of Reparative Justice

$42.74 $56.99

Make America Constitutional Again, On Point: After Debt Default, Survival and A Constitutional Federal Government

$4.95 $4.95

On the Constitutional and Moral Right Or Wrong of Our National Debt

$8.95 $11.95

Fiscal Rules - Limits on Governmental Deficits and Debt (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law Book 20)

$127.27 $159

Make America Constitutional Again: After National Debt Default, Survival and Constitutional Federal Government

$4.95 $8.95

Constitutional Originalism: A Debate

$19.66 $34.95

Not showing up for a court date can lead to jail time

In the US, debtors' prisons were abolished in the 1830s when the US Supreme Court ruled that jail time for debt was unconstitutional. Thus, you cannot be sent to jail for defaulting on a personal loan, student loan, credit card debt, or a commercial loan. However, there is an exception for fraud, such as taking out a loan with no intention of paying it back, or failure to pay child support.

Although you cannot be imprisoned for debt, failing to show up for a court date is a serious matter and can indeed lead to jail time. This is because failure to appear in court when ordered is considered a violation of a court order and can result in criminal charges. In Washington State, for example, it is against the law to miss any type of courtroom proceeding, regardless of the reason for being summoned.

If you do not show up for your court date, a judge can issue a bench warrant for your arrest, and you may be taken into custody without bail until your next court date. This can happen during a routine traffic stop or even at your home or workplace. Once in custody, you may be held in jail until a hearing is conducted on your failure to appear. The judge can then impose a jail sentence or fines if you are found guilty of failure to appear, bail jumping, or contempt of court.

Therefore, it is crucial to communicate any legitimate reasons for not being able to attend your court date as soon as possible. While you may be granted a continuance, it will be on a date and time chosen by the court, and it is advisable to consult a criminal defense attorney for guidance.

Willfully violating a court order can result in jail time

While debtors' prisons were abolished in the US in 1833, and it is illegal to jail people for debt, there are still ways that creditors can manipulate the system to have debtors jailed. This is because, while debt is the underlying cause for a debtor's sentencing to jail time, the real reason they are sent to jail is due to debt-related misconduct, such as failing to obey a court order to make payments on a debt.

For example, if a debtor is sued by a debt collector and does not respond, this could lead to arrest. In some states, a creditor may request a Debtor's Examination (Deposition in Aid of Execution) if a judgment has been issued against the debtor. This occurs when a creditor orders the debtor to go to court to answer questions about their financial situation under oath. If the debtor does not show up at the examination, they could be found in contempt of court and face jail time.

Additionally, in some states, a court may order a debtor to pay periodic payments on a debt. As long as the debtor abides by making these payments, they will usually not go to jail. However, if they fail to make these payments, they could face jail time.

It is important to note that debtors have rights that protect them, and they can seek legal aid to help resolve their debt issues and limit the risk of a lawsuit.

Frequently asked questions