Education's Constitutional Protection: A Right Or Privilege?

Education is not a right that is protected by the US Constitution. This has been asserted by the US Supreme Court every time it has been challenged. The question of whether education is a constitutional right was first raised in the 1973 case San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez. Since then, the Supreme Court has affirmed that education is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under the Constitution. However, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment has been applied to educational issues, such as in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case, which laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools.

Explore related products

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$25 $74.95

Quality Education as a Constitutional Right: Creating a Grassroots Movement to Transform Public Schools

$15.99 $20

Your Special Education Rights: What Your School District Isn't Telling You

$32.99 $32.99

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Rights: Cases in Context (Aspen Casebook Series)

$177 $177

Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice

$197

Education is not a constitutionally protected right

In 2016, a group of seven DPS students filed a lawsuit, in what became the Gary B. case, seeking to challenge precedent under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs attended five of Detroit's lowest-performing schools. However, the answer is still no – there is no federally protected constitutional right to education.

Judge Eric Murphy’s 24-page dissent from the majority opinion in the three-judge panel decision is full of supporting precedent and reason as to why the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to education. Jenn Ayscue, Ph.D., an assistant professor in the Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis and Educational Leadership programs at the NC State College of Education, explained that even though education is not directly addressed in the Constitution, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment has been applied to educational issues.

The U.S. Supreme Court has asserted this every time it has been challenged

The U.S. Supreme Court has asserted that education is not a constitutionally protected right every time it has been challenged. The lineage of this assertion began with San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez in 1973, where the court opined that education "is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution". This interpretation was affirmed in three other cases in the 1980s.

In 2016, a group of seven DPS students filed a lawsuit, known as the Gary B. case, which sought to challenge this precedent under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs attended five of Detroit's lowest-performing schools. Despite this challenge, the answer remains the same: there is no federally protected constitutional right to education.

However, it is important to note that while education is not directly addressed in the Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been applied to educational issues. This clause provided the basis for the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, which laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools.

Judge Eric Murphy's dissent from the majority opinion in a three-judge panel decision also provides supporting precedent and reason as to why the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to education.

The 14th Amendment's equal protection clause has been applied to educational issues

The U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to education. This assertion has been made by the U.S. Supreme Court every time it has been challenged. The lineage begins with San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez in 1973, and has been affirmed in three other cases in the 1980s. However, the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause has been applied to educational issues.

In 1954, the Brown v. Board of Education decision laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools. The Supreme Court ruled that separate educational facilities for black and white students were inherently unequal. This ruling was based on the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.

The 14th Amendment states that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". This means that all people within a state's jurisdiction are entitled to equal protection under the law, regardless of race, gender, religion, or any other characteristic.

The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment has been used to challenge educational policies that are discriminatory or that deny equal educational opportunities to certain groups of people. For example, in the Gary B. case, a group of seven DPS students filed a lawsuit challenging the precedent under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs attended five of Detroit's lowest-performing schools.

While the right to education is not explicitly protected by the Constitution, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment has been used to ensure that all people have equal access to education, regardless of their race, gender, or other characteristics.

Explore related products

A Federal Right to Education

$26 $45

The Constitutional and Legal Rights of Women (Higher Education Coursebook)

$164

Academic Freedom: From Professional Norm to First Amendment Right

$23.8 $29.95

American Constitutional Law: Liberty, Community, and the Bill of Rights (Higher Education Coursebook)

$181

Constitutional Law: Essential Law Self-Teaching Guide (Essential Law Self-Teaching Guides)

$24.95 $26.95

Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws

$12.29 $26.99

The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools

Education is not a constitutionally protected right. This has been asserted by the U.S. Supreme Court every time it has been challenged.

The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision was a landmark ruling that laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools. The case was brought by the Browns and twelve other local black families in similar situations, who filed a class-action lawsuit in U.S. federal court against the Topeka Board of Education, alleging its segregation policy was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools were otherwise equal in quality. This decision overruled the Court's 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, which had held that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality. The Brown v. Board decision was a major victory for the civil rights movement and paved the way for integration. It established the precedent that "separate-but-equal" education and other services were not, in fact, equal. Within about a decade after the decision, schools across the nation, primarily in the southeast where they had de jure segregation, began to desegregate.

The judiciary is unable to determine what level of quality would be sufficient

Despite this, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment has been applied to educational issues. This clause provided the basis for the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, which laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools.

Frequently asked questions