Amending The Constitution: An Uphill Battle

Amending the US Constitution is notoriously difficult. The document was designed to be hard to change, but not impossible. The process requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. Following this, three-quarters of states must ratify the amendment. This has resulted in only 27 amendments being ratified out of 33 passed by Congress and sent to the states. In recent times, the political divide in Congress has made it even harder to garner the required support, with some arguing that the current system is dysfunctional.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$103.23 $150

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.18

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.34 $45

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

The US Constitution is the world's most difficult to amend

The US Constitution is widely considered to be the world's most difficult to amend. The document's framers intended for it to be challenging to change, believing that this would create stability in the country. The process of amending the Constitution has become even more difficult in recent years, with the last successful amendment being the 27th Amendment in 1992.

The US Constitution can only be amended through a specific process outlined in Article V. An amendment must be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. Following this, three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) must ratify the amendment for it to become part of the Constitution.

This process has proven to be challenging, with many proposed amendments never reaching ratification. While there have been approximately 11,848 measures proposed to amend the Constitution since 1789, only 27 amendments have been successfully ratified. The high threshold for approval, requiring supermajorities in Congress and state legislatures, makes it difficult to enact changes to the Constitution.

The difficulty in amending the Constitution has led to concerns about its ability to adapt to modern times and address the country's significant issues. Some argue that the Constitution has become frozen and impervious to amendment, making it challenging to renovate outdated aspects of the document.

However, it's important to note that the ease of amending the Constitution has varied throughout history. During the Progressive Era, for example, the Constitution was amended four times in less than a decade due to intense social activism and institutional reform. While the framers intended for the Constitution to be enduring, they also recognized the need for amendments to address future challenges and crises.

Amending the Constitution is the most difficult way to change laws

Amending the Constitution is a challenging and lengthy process, and it is considered the most difficult way to change laws in the United States. The Constitution is the founding document of the nation and is regarded as the "'supreme law of the land," which means that any changes to it have far-reaching implications.

The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately made difficult by the Framers, who wanted to ensure its longevity and stability. They could not have anticipated how challenging it would become with the expansion of the nation to 50 states and a population of over 300 million people. According to Article V, an amendment must be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. Achieving a two-thirds majority in today's highly divided Congress is extremely difficult.

The proposed amendment then needs to be ratified by legislatures or conventions in 38 out of 50 states (three-fourths of the states). This high threshold ensures that amendments are usually permanent and widely accepted across the country. The entire process is complex and time-consuming, resulting in only 27 amendments being ratified out of 33 passed by Congress and sent to the states.

The Constitution was once considered too easy to amend, particularly during the Progressive Era, when it was amended four times in less than a decade. However, over time, it has become increasingly challenging to amend, with the last successful amendment being the 27th Amendment in 1992, which took 202 years to obtain enough state votes.

While some critics argue that the Constitution is too rigid and difficult to amend, others defend its current state, emphasizing the importance of stability and the need for other avenues to address legislative issues. The difficulty in amending the Constitution highlights the significance of the process and ensures that any changes made are carefully considered and widely supported.

The Framers intended the process to be difficult

The United States Constitution is considered the “supreme law of the land”, and the government must follow it. The Constitution can only be changed through the amendment process, and constitutional amendments are rare. In over 230 years, there have only been 27 amendments. The Framers, the men who wrote the Constitution, wanted the amendment process to be difficult. They believed that a long and complicated amendment process would help create stability in the United States.

The process of amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult because the Framers wanted to ensure that the document would be enduring. They knew that for it to meet future challenges and crises, amendments would be necessary, but they wanted to make sure that any changes were carefully considered. The difficulty of amending the Constitution has resulted in a stable and consistent framework for the country's laws and government.

The process of amending the Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. To amend the Constitution, two-thirds of both houses of Congress must pass the amendment. Then, three-fourths of all states must ratify the amendment, either in their state houses or at a special convention. This high threshold for approval makes it challenging to enact constitutional changes.

The difficulty of amending the Constitution has been a topic of debate in recent years. Some people argue that the process is too difficult and that it has become increasingly challenging due to political polarization and congressional dysfunction. Others defend the rigorous process, stating that it ensures stability and prevents hasty decisions.

While the Framers intended the amendment process to be difficult, they likely did not anticipate the level of difficulty that would arise as the nation grew in size and population. The increasing political polarization and gridlock in Congress have further contributed to the challenge of enacting constitutional changes. As a result, some have proposed amendments that would make it easier to amend the Constitution, but these efforts have not gained widespread support.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$16.7 $26.99

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy

$12.65 $27.95

The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution

$16.69 $17.95

Perfecting the U.S. Constitution: 27 and Counting, The Amendments that Shaped America’s Future (Anthem Studies in Law Reform, 1)

$19.99 $90

Congress has become dysfunctional

Secondly, the legislative process itself has become dysfunctional. Committees that were once important for developing expertise and influence have become marginalized, with party leaders and interest groups controlling the process behind closed doors. Party leaders are reluctant to bring legislation before the full House and Senate unless they are assured of a favourable outcome, avoiding any potential divisions within their caucus or alienation of their voter base.

Thirdly, there is a culture of inaction and a lack of seriousness about legislating. Failure to act has become normalized, and members often blame constraints or external factors rather than taking responsibility. This has been exacerbated by a legislative calendar that requires members to be in Washington for only three days a week, further reducing opportunities for meaningful debate and compromise.

Additionally, the frequent ousting of speakers and the threat of government shutdowns contribute to the dysfunction. A small group of right-wing members can wield significant influence, as seen in the case of Kevin McCarthy, who was ousted as speaker for compromising with Democrats. This sends a message that compromise is unacceptable, further entrenching partisan positions and making it harder to find common ground.

Finally, Congress's dysfunction is also reflected in its inability to address pressing issues facing the country, such as immigration, deficits, and climate change. Instead of tackling these challenges head-on, members often prioritize short-term political gains and ideological purity over finding practical solutions.

While Congress has become dysfunctional, it is important to note that there are efforts to break through the partisan gridlock and restore a functioning legislature. However, until there is a shift in the political culture and a willingness to compromise and address the country's challenges, Congress's dysfunction will likely persist.

The Constitution was once thought to be too easy to amend

The United States Constitution is considered the “supreme law of the land,” and it can only be changed through the amendment process. The Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come," and the framers made amending the document a difficult task to ensure its longevity. In the Progressive Era, a period of intense social activism and institutional reform from the 1890s to the 1910s, the Constitution was amended four times in less than a decade. This led to concerns that the Constitution was too easily amendable.

The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately challenging. An amendment must be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. Following this, three-fourths of the states must ratify the amendment. This two-step process, requiring approval from both the federal and state levels, is designed to create stability in the country.

The Constitution has become increasingly difficult to amend in recent years. Over half of the Constitution's amendments were made in the first third of the country's existence, with the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, being ratified almost immediately. The most recent amendment, the 27th Amendment, took 202 years to be ratified by enough states to become part of the Constitution in 1992.

The difficulty in amending the Constitution has led to a backlog of proposed amendments. Since 1789, approximately 11,848 measures have been proposed to amend the Constitution, with only 27 amendments successfully ratified. While some argue that the Constitution is too rigid and difficult to amend, others believe that the current level of difficulty is appropriate. The framers of the Constitution intended for it to be challenging to amend, recognising that it would need to evolve to meet future challenges and crises.

Frequently asked questions