Resident Alien Rights: Are They Protected By The Us Constitution?

The US Constitution provides resident aliens with certain protections, including the right to due process of law and equal protection of the laws. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee these rights to all 'persons' within the United States, regardless of their legal status. The Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, has also been construed as applicable to resident aliens. In addition, the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech and of the press to aliens residing in the country. While states may not pass regulations affecting aliens that conflict with federal laws or the Constitution, they may pass other regulations if they bear a rational relationship to a legitimate state interest.

Explore related products

The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (The Seeley Lectures, Series Number 5)

$21.96 $30

Resident Aliens: Life in the Christian Colony (Expanded 25th Anniversary Edition)

$14.16 $21.99

Resident Alien Omnibus Volume 1

$21.78 $24.99

Resident Alien: Season Three

$27.47

An Analysis of Seyla Benhabib's The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens (The Macat Library)

$8.5 $8.95

Resident Alien Volume 4: The Man with No Name

$14.33 $14.99

Aliens are considered 'persons' under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments

Aliens are considered persons under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. This means that aliens residing in the United States are guaranteed the right to due process of law and equal protection of the laws. The Fifth Amendment states that aliens are entitled to constitutional protection, regardless of whether their presence in the country is lawful, unlawful, temporary or permanent.

The Fourteenth Amendment also applies to aliens who have established connections in the United States, such as those with substantial ties to the country or those who have gained admission and begun to develop ties that go with permanent residence.

In addition, aliens receive treatment very similar to that of US citizens in the judicial system. For example, aliens have the right to freedom of speech and of the press, as well as the right to retain counsel and assistance from their embassy if they fail to abide by certain obligations, such as paying state and federal taxes.

While states may not pass regulations affecting aliens that directly conflict with federal laws or the US Constitution, they may pass other regulations if they bear some rational relationship to a legitimate state interest.

Aliens are entitled to due process of law

The Court has reasoned that aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognised as 'persons' guaranteed due process of law. This is supported by the Supreme Court case of Zadvydas v. Davis, which explained that the Due Process Clause applies to all 'persons' within the United States, including aliens, regardless of their legal status.

In addition, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press, also applies to aliens residing in the country. While the amendment makes no distinction between citizens and noncitizens, Supreme Court precedents do not always interpret the amendment in the same way for both groups.

However, it is important to note that the Court has suggested that the constitutional protections to which an alien is entitled may depend on whether the alien has been admitted into the United States or has developed substantial ties to the country. For example, in the case of United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the Court stated that aliens receive constitutional protections when they have come within the territory of the United States and developed substantial connections with the country.

Aliens are protected by the First Amendment

In various opinions, the Court has suggested that at least some of the constitutional protections to which an alien is entitled may turn upon whether the alien has been admitted into the United States or developed substantial ties to the country. Aliens who have established connections in the U.S. have due process rights in deportation proceedings.

Aliens who reside in the U.S. have certain obligations that U.S. citizens also have, such as paying state and federal taxes. For situations in which an alien fails to abide by these obligations, the alien may retain counsel and assistance from the alien's embassy. States possess the power to confer additional rights on aliens within their respective jurisdictions.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution apply to aliens residing within the United States. As such, the courts guarantee aliens the right to due process of law and equal protection of the laws. The Fourth Amendment also applies to aliens, prohibiting the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures.

Explore related products

Resident Alien Volume 6: Your Ride's Here

$10.99 $17.99

Resident Alien Volume 5: An Alien in New York (Resident Alien, 5)

$20.82

Resident Alien Volume 1: Welcome to Earth!

$8.99

Resident Alien Volume 2: The Suicide Blonde

$8.99

Citizen Strangers: Palestinians and the Birth of Israel's Liberal Settler State (Stanford Studies in Middle Eastern and Islamic Societies and Cultures)

$9.99 $19.99

The Constitutional Protection of Capitalism

$94 $110

Aliens are entitled to the same constitutional protections as citizens, except for voting, some government jobs and gun ownership

The US Constitution makes no distinction between citizens and noncitizens, and the Supreme Court has determined that aliens are entitled to the same constitutional protections as citizens, except for voting, some government jobs, and gun ownership. The Court has reasoned that aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognised as "persons" guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. This means that even those whose presence in the country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory are entitled to constitutional protection.

The Court has also concluded that freedom of speech and of the press is accorded to aliens residing in the country. In Bridges v. Wixon (1945), the Court reversed the deportation of labour activist Harry Bridges, an Australian, because of statements he had made that prosecutors charged indicated "affiliation" with the Communist Party. Writing for the Court, Justice William O. Douglas concluded that "the literature published by Harry Bridges, the utterances made by him were entitled to that protection".

However, it is important to note that the constitutional protections afforded to aliens may depend on whether they have been admitted into the United States or have developed substantial ties to the country. For example, in Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam (2020), the Court stated that "aliens who have established connections in this country have due process rights in deportation proceedings".

Aliens who have developed substantial ties to the US are entitled to constitutional protections

Aliens who reside in the US have certain obligations that US citizens also have, such as paying state and federal taxes. In situations where an alien fails to abide by these obligations, they may retain counsel and assistance from their embassy. States possess the power to confer additional rights on aliens within their respective jurisdictions, as long as these rights do not directly conflict with federal laws or the US Constitution.

Aliens are also guaranteed due process of law and equal protection of the laws by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the US Constitution. The Fourth Amendment, which prohibits the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures, has also been construed as applicable to aliens.

Writing for the Court, Justice William O. Douglas concluded that "freedom of speech and of the press is accorded aliens residing in this country". Although the First Amendment to the US Constitution makes no distinction between citizens and noncitizens, Supreme Court precedents interpreting the amendment do not always treat these groups the same.

Frequently asked questions