Sectionalism In The Constitution: Evident Divide Of 1787

Sectionalism in the context of the US refers to an identification with a geographic section of the country and the cultural, social, economic, and political interests of that section. The Constitution of 1787 was drafted by 55 delegates in Philadelphia and was the first written constitution for any nation in the world. It was neither wholly anti-slavery nor wholly pro-slavery. It recognised the existence of slavery as a powerful sectional interest and granted slaveholders important privileges. It also allowed for important state and federal action against slavery, such as the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which prohibited slavery in what would become the states of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The Constitution also contained a territorial clause that granted the federal government the power to make rules for US territories, which would become eligible for statehood once their population reached 60,000. The Missouri Compromise of 1820, which admitted Missouri (a slave state) and Maine (a free state) to the Union, marked a turning point in America's sectional crisis by exposing how divisive the issue of slavery had become.

Explore related products

The Constitution of 1787: A Commentary

$29.7 $35

Constitutional Convention of 1787, The: A Reference Guide (Guides to Historic Events in America)

$15.86 $29.95

History of American Abolitionism; Its Four Great Epochs, Embracing Narratives of the Ordinance of 1787, Compromise of 1820, Annexation of Texas, Mexic

$14.4

History of American Abolitionism; Its Four Great Epochs, Embracing Narratives of the Ordinance of 1787, Compromise of 1820, Annexation of Texas, ... Riots, Slave Rescues, Compromise of 1850,...

$24.95

The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

$18.89 $47.99

The Union As It Is: Constitutional Unionism and Sectional Compromise, 1787-1861

$29.99 $50

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 prohibited slavery in future states Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois

The Constitution of 1787 was a product of prolonged conflict, debate, and accommodation. It recognised the existence of slavery, granting slaveholders privileges, but also allowed for state and federal action against it. It did not establish the US as a slaveholders' union. The Constitution's provisions regarding slavery were the result of a series of conflicts and compromises.

Sectionalism was evident in the Constitution of 1787, and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 is a key example of this. The Ordinance prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territory, which would become the states of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. This signaled a willingness to limit the expansion of slavery into federal government-owned territories.

The Northwest Ordinance, adopted on July 13, 1787, provided a government for the Northwest Territory and a method for admitting new states to the Union. Article VI of the Ordinance, also known as Article 6, prohibited slavery and indentured servitude in the region. This reflected the views of national politicians who wanted to limit slavery's expansion into federal territories. The Ordinance also included a fugitive slave clause, which was later mirrored in the Constitution.

The inclusion of the fugitive slave clause and the removal of Article VI from the Ordinance by Massachusetts delegate Nathan Dane, the author of the Ordinance, demonstrated the influence of Southern states and delegates. Southerners did not want competing slave economies north of the Ohio River, and they supported the prohibition of slavery in the Northwest Territory to protect their interests.

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787, with its prohibition of slavery in future states, reflected the complex dynamics of sectionalism evident in the Constitution of 1787. It represented a compromise between the interests of the North and the South, and the desire to balance the expansion of slavery with the preservation of the union.

The Constitution recognised slavery as a powerful sectional interest, granting slaveholders privileges

The Constitution of 1787 was the product of prolonged and contentious conflict, debate, and accommodation. The 55 delegates to the convention in Philadelphia that summer were divided over the issue of slavery, which was not on the original agenda but could not be avoided. About 25 of the delegates owned slaves, and many had moral qualms about the practice.

The Constitution recognised slavery as a powerful sectional interest, granting slaveholders important privileges. It enabled representation in the South to be based on rules defining enslaved people as three-fifths of a voter, meaning Southern white men were overrepresented in Congress. The Constitution also stipulated that Congress could not interfere with the slave trade before 1808 and enabled Congress to draft fugitive slave laws.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a concession to the South, which had wanted slaves to be counted as full voters. It was a victory for the Southern slave power in national politics. The compromise did not validate slavery nationally, and the Constitution stopped short of making the United States a slaveholders' republic. It allowed for important state and federal action against slavery and did not establish the United States as a slaveholders' union.

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 prohibited slavery in what would become Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and politicians from both sections agreed that the federal government had the authority to prohibit slavery in territories it owned. However, the first federal Congress voted to permit slavery in the Southwest Territory, which became Tennessee in 1796. North Carolina agreed to cede the land that would become the Southwest Territory to the federal government on the condition that Congress would not use its powers to prohibit slavery there.

The Constitution's Article 1, Section 2, enabled representation in the South to be based on enslaved people as 3/5 of a voter

The Constitution of 1787 was a product of prolonged and contentious conflict, debate, and accommodation. It was drafted by fifty-five delegates in Philadelphia, many of whom owned slaves. The Constitution recognised the existence of slavery as a powerful sectional interest and granted slaveholders important privileges. It also allowed for important state and federal action against slavery, stopping short of constitutionally establishing the US as a slaveholders' republic.

Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution, also known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, is considered one of the most infamous provisions of the US Constitution. It enabled representation in the South to be based on rules defining enslaved people as three-fifths of a voter. This meant that southern white men were overrepresented in Congress and had relatively more power than voters in the northern states, making abolition less likely. This provision also gave slaveholders greater power in Southern legislatures.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a result of a dispute between slaveholding states and free states. Slaveholding states wanted their entire population to be counted to determine the number of representatives they could send to Congress. Free states, on the other hand, wanted to exclude the counting of slave populations since slaves had no voting rights. The compromise counted three-fifths of each state's slave population towards the total population for the purpose of apportioning the House of Representatives.

The inclusion of this clause in the Constitution had significant implications for the future of slavery in the US. It reflected the concessions made to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. The framers of the Constitution believed that if they restricted the slave trade, some southern states would refuse to join the Union. By sidestepping the issue of slavery, the framers laid the groundwork for future conflict.

The Missouri Compromise in 1821 marked a turning point in America's sectional crisis, exposing how divisive the issue of slavery had become. It sparked debates about the intentions of the Constitutional framers regarding slavery's expansion and the interpretation of phrases like "all men are created equal". While the Three-Fifths Compromise was superseded by the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, the legacy of slavery and sectionalism continued to shape American society and politics well beyond the Civil War.

Explore related products

Federalism: A Very Short Introduction

$11 $12.99

The Federalist Papers, Extended Edition: An Essential Collection of The Original, Unabridged Text (1787–88) With Detailed Commentary on Each Essay to Guide you Through America's Founding Ideas

$24.95

Progressive States' Rights: The Forgotten History of Federalism (Constitutional Thinking)

$37.79 $44.99

The Federalist Papers: The Ideas that Forged the American Constitution (Arcturus Ornate Classics)

$12.99

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

FEDERALISM: How Decentralization Can Save America

$24.99

The Missouri Compromise exposed how divisive the slavery issue was, with legislators battling over the intentions of the framers

The Constitution of 1787 recognised the existence of slavery as a powerful sectional interest and granted slaveholders important privileges. It also allowed for important state and federal action against slavery, and did not establish the United States as a slaveholders' republic or union. The Constitution was the product of prolonged and contentious conflict, debate, and accommodation.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a major turning point in America's sectional crisis. It exposed to the public just how divisive the slavery issue had become. The debate filled newspapers, speeches, and Congressional records. Legislators battled for weeks over whether the framers of the Constitution intended for slavery to expand. These contests left deep scars, and even seemingly simple phrases like "All Men Are Created Equal" were hotly contested.

Antislavery participants in the Missouri debates argued that the framers never intended for slavery to survive the Revolution and hoped it would disappear through peaceful means. They pointed to the Tenth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment as evidence that slavery could be banned in the territories. The Three-Fifths Clause of the Constitution, which allowed for greater legislative representation for states with slave populations, had already given the South a significant number of legislative victories and increased their influence in party caucuses and the appointment of judges.

Proslavery legislators countered that the framers supported slavery and wanted to see it expand. They argued that the Constitution had long been interpreted as having relinquished any claim to restricting slavery in the states. The free inhabitants of Missouri, they claimed, had the right to establish or disengage slavery without interference from the federal government.

The Missouri Compromise created a new sectional consensus that most white Americans hoped would ensure a lasting peace. However, it also exposed deep fault lines in American society. The debates over Missouri's admission offered the first sustained debate on the question of Black citizenship, as Missouri's State Constitution wanted to impose a hard ban on any future Black migrants. Legislators agreed that this ban violated the Constitution but reaffirmed Missouri's ability to deny citizenship to African Americans.

Sectionalism was driven by economic differences, with the North industrialising and the South's economy dependent on slavery

The Constitution of 1787 was a product of prolonged and contentious conflict, debate, and accommodation. It was shaped by the emergence of sectional differences between the North and the South, driven by contrasting economic visions and practices. The North was industrialising, while the South's economy was predominantly agrarian and dependent on slavery.

The North and the South in the United States developed along divergent economic paths in the decades leading up to the Civil War. The South, with its vast farmland and favourable climate for agriculture, relied heavily on slave labour to cultivate profitable crops like tobacco and cotton. This "peculiar institution" was deeply entrenched in the region's economy and culture. By 1860, there were nearly as many blacks, both enslaved and free, in the South as there were whites, with approximately 4 million blacks and 5.5 million whites in the region. The South lacked large-scale industrial cities, and most Southerners lived and worked on farms or plantations. The economic practices in the South, centred on slavery and agriculture, contributed to its distinct social and cultural characteristics.

In contrast, the North embarked on a path of industrialisation. The absence of a predominant reliance on slavery and the emergence of industrial cities marked a significant divergence from the South. The North attracted immigrants seeking employment opportunities, further contributing to its demographic and economic growth. The urban-industrial nature of the North's economy fostered different values and a vision for the future that contrasted with the agrarian South.

The economic differences between the North and the South influenced their political affiliations and ideologies. Southern men, for example, tended to align with the Democratic political party and were more inclined towards military careers and agricultural pursuits. The North, on the other hand, witnessed the rise of new political parties and reform movements that challenged traditional institutions, including slavery.

The Constitution of 1787 reflected the sectional interests and conflicts of the time. It recognised the existence of slavery and granted slaveholders important privileges, such as representation in the South based on enslaved people being counted as three-fifths of a voter, resulting in overrepresentation of Southern white men in Congress. However, it also allowed for state and federal action against slavery and stopped short of establishing a slaveholders' republic. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787, for instance, prohibited slavery in what would become Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, demonstrating a willingness to limit slavery's expansion into federal territories.

In summary, sectionalism in the Constitution of 1787 was driven by economic differences between the North and the South. The North's industrialisation and the South's dependence on slavery and agriculture led to contrasting economic practices, political affiliations, and social structures, shaping the content and interpretation of the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions