The Constitution: Ratification Made Simpler

The ratification of the U.S. Constitution was a complex and contentious process that took place between 1787 and 1791. The final draft of the Constitution was signed by 38 or 39 delegates (out of 41 or 55) on September 17, 1787, and it was agreed that the document would only come into effect once it had been ratified by nine of the 13 states. The ratification process sparked an intense national debate between Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. The Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and lacked a Bill of Rights. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a strong central government was necessary to unify the nation, protect against foreign threats, and manage domestic affairs. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, produced The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays that defended the proposed government and addressed Anti-Federalist concerns. The ratification process was further complicated by the requirement of unanimous approval from state legislatures, which slowed down the process and led to the decision to bypass them in favor of special ratifying conventions in each state.

Explore related products

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Founding Fathers Guide to the Constitution

$16.99 $17.16

The Ratification of the Federal Constitution by the State of New York [electronic Resource]

$25.95

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Contest Over the Ratification of the Federal Constitution in the State of Massachusetts

$2.99 $11.85

Constitutional Convention of 1787, The: A Reference Guide (Guides to Historic Events in America)

$15.86 $29.95

The Federalists' lobbying efforts

The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, played a crucial role in lobbying for the ratification of the Constitution. They argued that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong and effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against external threats, and effectively managing domestic affairs.

Hamilton, Madison, and Jay produced 85 essays known as "The Federalist Papers," which explained and defended the proposed new government's functionality. These essays were published in newspapers nationwide, primarily in New York state newspapers like "The New York Packet" and "The Independent Journal." The Federalist Papers were addressed to the people of New York but were aimed at influencing the delegates to the state's ratifying convention.

The Federalist Papers were a key tool for the Federalists, articulating arguments in favor of ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns. They explained specific provisions of the Constitution in detail, urging New Yorkers to ratify the proposed Constitution over the existing Articles of Confederation. The essays made a strong case for the Constitution, highlighting the checks and balances built into it to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists also made strategic concessions to sway skeptics in several states. They agreed to recommend and draft a Bill of Rights, which guaranteed fundamental freedoms such as speech, religion, and the press, as well as protections against government overreach. This concession was crucial in gaining the support of states like Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, which were initially opposed to ratification.

Additionally, the Federalists accepted two key Anti-Federalist positions: first, that the Constitution must be adopted or rejected in its entirety, and second, that ratifying conventions should not propose amendments as a requirement for ratification. These concessions made ratification of the new Constitution more likely and contributed to the Federalists' successful lobbying efforts.

The Anti-Federalists' concerns

The Anti-Federalists, a late-18th-century political movement, opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, they worried that the position of president might evolve into a monarchy. They also believed that a large central government would not serve the interests of small towns and rural areas.

The Anti-Federalists' chief concern was that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They advocated for a more decentralised form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states. They also believed that the federal government's powers to tax could be used to exploit citizens and weaken the power of the states.

The Anti-Federalists also criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights, arguing that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press. They believed that the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties. This view was shared by North Carolina, which initially rejected the Constitution but ratified it in November 1789 after the promise of amendments.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition led to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. They include the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments. To accommodate Anti-Federalist concerns, the Bill of Rights also reserves any power not given to the federal government to the states and the people.

Ratification by nine of 13 states

Ratification by nine of the 13 states was the requirement for the U.S. Constitution to take effect. The process of ratification was contentious, with the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, in support of the Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, opposed to it. The Federalists argued that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong, centralized government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They believed the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights.

The first state to ratify the Constitution was Delaware on December 7, 1787. This was followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina. On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the Constitution, officially ending government under the Articles of Confederation. This ensured that the Constitution would go into effect, despite key states like Virginia and New York not having yet ratified it.

The ratification process was facilitated by the substitution of state conventions instead of state legislatures as the bodies to consider ratification. This made it easier to obtain ratification as ad hoc state conventions would only meet once and then disband, whereas legislatures would have to give up some of their own powers. Additionally, 11 states had bicameral legislatures, requiring two struggles to obtain a single state’s adoption.

The intense national debate surrounding ratification played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings across the country. The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay, were a key tool for the Federalists, articulating arguments in favour of ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns. The essays were published in newspapers nationwide and helped lobby for votes in favour of ratifying the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence: The Promise and the Fulfillment. The Two Most Sacred Documents of our Republic.

$5.99

The Federalist Papers

$18.54

The Federalist Papers: A Foundational Guide to American Government, Liberty, and Constitutional Law

$1.99

Founding Fathers: The Essential Guide to the Men Who Made America

$14.77 $19.99

Founding Fathers

$18.88 $19.98

America The Story of Us (TV Series)

$2.99

The Articles of Confederation

The final draft of the Articles of Confederation was submitted to the state legislatures in November 1777 for their unanimous approval. Seven states ratified the Articles quickly, while also submitting proposed amendments. Congress rejected all of the proposed amendments. It took three and a half years to ratify the Articles due to the requirement of unanimous approval. Virginia was the first state to ratify the Articles on December 16, 1777, and 12 states had ratified by February 1779. Maryland was the last state to ratify the Articles on March 1, 1781, bringing the Congress of the Confederation into being.

The Bill of Rights

The ratification of the U.S. Constitution was a long and contentious process. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution, arguing that it provided a necessary framework for a strong, centralized government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, opposed the ratification, fearing that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and individual liberties. They demanded the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect these freedoms.

Initially, James Madison, a key supporter of the Constitution, also believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary. However, as the ratification process continued, it became clear that the support of some states, like Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, was dependent on the promise of a Bill of Rights. This led to the Massachusetts Compromise, in which these states agreed to ratify the Constitution on the condition that amendments, in the form of a Bill of Rights, would be proposed.

The Anti-Federalists' demands for a Bill of Rights were also influenced by their fear of excessive government power following oppression under the English monarchy. They wanted specific rights to be outlined and protected, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press. Madison, recognizing the importance voters attached to these protections, took the lead in drafting the amendments. He proposed a list of amendments that focused on rights, rather than structural changes to the government, to gain support from both Congress and the states.

On June 8, 1789, Madison introduced 17 amendments to the Constitution, which were revised by Congress to consist of 12 amendments. These were sent to the states for ratification, and by December 15, 1791, three-fourths of the states had ratified 10 of these amendments, collectively known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments guaranteed fundamental freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as protections against government overreach. The inclusion of the 9th Amendment also addressed the concern that listing rights might exclude others, stating that the absence of a right from the list does not imply its nonexistence.

Frequently asked questions