Writs In The Constitution: What Types Exist?

Writs are formal written orders issued by the executive or judicial body, commanding constitutional remedies against the violation of fundamental rights. The Indian Constitution has five writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto. These writs are issued by the Supreme Court under Article 32 and by the High Court under Article 226. They are an important part of the law, offering justice and quick relief to citizens whose rights have been infringed.

Explore related products

The Complete Legal Writer

$63 $63

Becoming a Legal Writer: A Workbook with Explanations to Develop Objective Legal Analysis and Writing Skills

$46

Writing to Win: The Legal Writer

$10.76 $19

Becoming a Legal Writer: A Workbook with Explanations to Develop Objective Legal Analysis and Writing Skills

$40

Aspen Handbook for Legal Writers (Aspen Coursebook Series)

$77.34 $85

Aspen Handbook for Legal Writers: A Practical Reference (Aspen Coursebook)

$20 $67

Habeas Corpus: Safeguards personal liberty

The Indian Constitution recognises five types of writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto, and Certiorari. The first among these, Habeas Corpus, is a safeguard against unlawful detention and protects personal liberty.

Habeas Corpus, literally translated from Latin as "to have the body of", is a written order from the Supreme Court or High Court that commands constitutional remedies for Indian citizens against the violation of their fundamental rights. It is used to enforce the fundamental right of individual liberty against unlawful detention. When a writ of Habeas Corpus is issued, the Court orders the person or authority that has arrested or detained another person to bring the detainee physically before the court. The court then examines the causes and legality of the detention. If the detention is found to be unlawful, the detainee is set free immediately.

Habeas Corpus is a fundamental instrument for safeguarding an individual's freedom against arbitrary and lawless state actions. It allows executive, judicial, or other governmental restraints on personal liberty to be subjected to judicial scrutiny. The writ of Habeas Corpus is not a narrow, static, and formalistic remedy, and must retain the flexibility to cut through various barriers of forms and procedural complexities by which a person may be imprisoned.

Habeas Corpus is deeply rooted in Anglo-American jurisprudence and has been recognised as the "Great Writ", holding profound legal importance. It acts as a bulwark against potential abuses of governmental authority, underscoring the legal system's resolute dedication to justice and the safeguarding of personal liberties.

Mandamus: Instruct authorities to carry out functions

Mandamus is one of the five types of writs issued in India by the Supreme Court and High Courts. It is a discretionary remedy and the application for it must be made in good faith. Mandamus instructs authorities to carry out their functions and fulfil their duties.

Mandamus is issued by the court to compel an authority to resume its work. It is a formal written order issued by the executive or judicial body that directs the individual or authority to do or refrain from doing a particular act. Mandamus is a legal recourse in the form of an order issued by a higher court to direct government entities, lower courts, corporations, or public authorities to either carry out a specific action required by law or refrain from actions they are obligated by law to avoid.

Mandamus is typically granted when an officer or authority is obligated by statute to fulfil a duty and has failed to do so despite a written request. Mandamus can be issued to an official of a society to compel him to carry out the terms of the statute under or by which the society is governed. It can also be issued to companies or corporations to carry out duties placed on them by the statutes authorizing their undertakings.

In the administrative law context in the United States, the requirement that mandamus can be used only to compel a ministerial act has largely been abandoned. In most states, acts of administrative agencies are now subject to judicial review for abuse of discretion.

Prohibition: Prohibits actions outside jurisdiction

Writs are formal written orders issued by a court that command constitutional remedies for citizens against the violation of their fundamental rights. The Indian Constitution has five writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Quo Warranto, and Prohibition.

The writ of prohibition is a judicial order that may be used by a higher court to prevent a lower court from interfering with the higher court's determination of a case pending appeal. It is a means of restricting lower courts from overstepping their jurisdictional boundaries. The writ of prohibition is typically granted when there is a clear showing that the lower court or body is acting without jurisdiction, or when it is about to exceed its lawful authority.

The writ of prohibition can be used to prevent a lower court from issuing orders over matters over which it has no jurisdiction. It may also be used to prevent the re-litigating of issues that have already been decided by a higher court. The writ is often issued by a superior court to a lower court, directing it not to proceed with a case that does not fall under its jurisdiction.

The writ of prohibition can be used to correct errors of law made by the lower court. If it can be shown that the lower court has misapplied the law or made a significant legal error that affects the fairness or legality of the proceedings, the higher court may issue the writ to prevent further erroneous actions.

The writ of prohibition can also be sought when a lower court or tribunal acts in a manner that is unconstitutional or beyond its lawful authority. This refers to situations where the court or tribunal exceeds its powers or acts contrary to the provisions of the constitution or governing legislation.

Explore related products

The Legal Memo: 50 Exercises for Mastery: Practice for the New Legal Writer

$31.06 $33.5

The Handbook for the New Legal Writer: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Coursebook)

$99 $155

The Handbook for the New Legal Writer (Aspen Coursebook Series) [Connected eBook with Study Center]

$39.28 $135

Dear 1L: Notes to Nurture a New Legal Writer

$40 $40

The Writer's Legal GPS: A Guide for Navigating the Legal Landscape of Publishing (a Sidebar Saturdays Desktop Reference) (Sidebar Saturdays Desk Reference)

$14.99 $14.99

Just Writing: Grammar, Punctuation, and Style for the Legal Writer (Aspen Coursebook Series)

$118 $125

Certiorari: Quashes illegal orders

The Indian Constitution recognises five types of writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto. These writs are judicial orders that protect citizens' rights and offer justice to all. They are issued by the Supreme Court and High Courts to enforce the fundamental rights of citizens.

Certiorari is one of the five writs recognised by the Indian Constitution. It is a formal written order issued by the Supreme Court or High Court to quash illegal orders passed by inferior courts, tribunals, or quasi-judicial authorities. The word "certiorari" means "to certify" or "to inform". This writ is issued to control the actions of administrative authorities and ensure they act within their jurisdiction.

The Certiorari writ is an important tool for upholding the rule of law and ensuring that inferior courts and tribunals do not exceed their powers. It provides a mechanism for higher courts to review and correct the decisions of lower courts, thereby protecting the rights of citizens and ensuring legal orders are carried out.

The Certiorari writ can be used in various scenarios, such as when a lower court has acted beyond its jurisdiction, or when a quasi-judicial body has made an illegal order. It can also be used to resolve disputes between the centre and state governments, as it allows the higher courts to intervene and correct any illegal orders or actions.

The Certiorari writ plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the legal system and ensuring that justice is served. It is a powerful tool that enables the Supreme Court and High Courts to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of citizens.

Quo Warranto: Opposes illegal authority

The Indian Constitution recognises five types of writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto. The first four types of writs are well-defined and understood, but the Quo Warranto writ is a less commonly used prerogative writ. Quo warranto is a Latin term that translates to "by what authority". It is a legal action used to oppose illegal authority by challenging a person's right to hold a public or corporate office.

The writ of Quo Warranto is a formal written order issued by a court that questions an individual's authority to exercise a particular right, power, or franchise. It asks individuals to provide proof of their authority to hold office and determine whether they are lawfully entitled to do so. The writ is typically used in cases where there is a dispute over whether a specific person has the legal right to hold a public office, such as in cases of electoral fraud or ineligibility. It is not used to evaluate the person's performance in the office but rather to test their legal right to hold that office. For example, a quo warranto action may be brought to determine whether a public official satisfies a requirement, such as residing in the district, or whether they are serving in two incompatible offices.

In the United States, quo warranto usually arises in civil cases where a plaintiff claims that a governmental or corporate official was not validly elected to their office or is wrongfully exercising powers beyond those authorised. In the United Kingdom, the writ of quo warranto was historically used by the crown to inquire into the authority of English lords claiming liberties and jurisdiction, such as the right to hold a court. While the writ of quo warranto has been abolished in England and Wales, it is still recognised in the United States, although it is uncommon.

In India, the writ of Quo Warranto can only be issued when a substantive public office of a permanent character, created by statute or the Constitution, is involved. It cannot be issued against private or ministerial offices. The writ gives the right to seek redressal to any individual other than the aggrieved person. It is an important tool for upholding the fundamental rights of citizens and ensuring that public offices are lawfully occupied.

Frequently asked questions