Liberals' Opposition To Multiple Constitutional Parts Explained

The US Constitution is a procedural document for the government, designed to be a radically progressive document. The Constitution has been revised by people inspired by liberal ideas, from the populists who sought the direct election of senators to proponents of women's rights who fought for the right to vote. However, the Constitution has become so irrelevant to liberals that they often point to the general welfare clause when confronted about the constitutionality of their proposals. Liberals believe that the government is capable of perfecting society, and they see the Constitution as an obstacle to achieving this.

Explore related products

The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government

$24.63 $29

The Grouchy Historian: An Old-Time Lefty Defends Our Constitution Against Right-Wing Hypocrites and Nutjobs

$13.49 $21.99

The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government

$13.65 $19

How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution

$5.38 $9

Our Scandalous Senate (Point of View, 1)

$19.98 $24.99

Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism: The Carus Lectures, 1988

$28 $27.99

Liberals believe the government can perfect society, while conservatives see the Constitution as limiting human selfishness

Liberals and conservatives have distinct views on the role of government and the Constitution in shaping society. Liberals believe that the government is a vital instrument for addressing social injustices and promoting progress. They see the government as a force for good, capable of perfecting or significantly improving society. This belief stems from their emphasis on individual rights and welfare, equality, and the inherent goodness of humanity.

Liberals advocate for state intervention to address issues such as extreme poverty, inadequate employment, healthcare, and education, which they view as essential for protecting individual freedom and autonomy. They are willing to experiment with large-scale social change to achieve these goals. Classical liberals, or libertarians, focus on limiting the state's power to protect basic rights, while modern liberals also recognize the threat posed by private economic actors, such as businesses, and support economic regulation to prevent worker exploitation and protect consumers.

In contrast, conservatives view the Constitution as a necessary constraint on human selfishness and a safeguard against excessive government intervention. They believe in preserving the traditions of a developed society, seeing them as the collective wisdom of the ages. Conservatives generally value individual freedom and responsibility, limited government, economic opportunity, and a strong national defense. They emphasize the binding foundations of morality, which promote group cohesion and minimize individual selfishness. This perspective aligns with their belief in balancing rights and responsibilities, where individuals are accountable to the group while pursuing their interests.

The differing perspectives on the role of government lead to contrasting views on the Constitution. Liberals tend to see the Constitution as an obstacle to their goals of social reform, as it limits the power of Congress to enact changes. They often point to the general welfare clause as justification for federal government intervention, despite the clause's specific reference to enumerated powers. Conservatives, on the other hand, view the Constitution as a crucial check on liberal ambitions, ensuring that Congress's powers are finite and well-defined.

Liberals believe in a mixed economy, government regulation, and labour rights

Liberalism is a political and economic doctrine that emphasises individual autonomy, equality of opportunity, and the protection of individual rights, such as consent of the governed, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, the separation of church and state, the right to bear arms, the right to due process, and equality before the law.

Modern liberalism, often referred to simply as liberalism, is the dominant version of liberalism in the United States. It combines ideas of civil liberty and equality with support for social justice and a mixed economy. In the US, modern liberalism is one of two major political ideologies, with the other being conservatism.

Modern liberalism supports a mixed economy, which involves a combination of private enterprise and state intervention. This is in contrast to classical liberalism, which advocates for a free-market economy with minimal government interference. While modern liberals recognise the importance of private property and free trade, they also believe that government regulation and social services are necessary to address economic inequality and protect individuals' rights.

In the 20th century, liberals in the US sought to expand governmental power and responsibility, a shift from the previous century when they generally advocated for limited government. This evolution was driven by a recognition that economic power can be a threat to individual freedom, and a willingness to reform social institutions to maximise individual liberty and opportunity. For example, during the Progressive Era in the late 19th century, liberals passed laws restricting the power of trusts (concentrations of economic power) to protect workers and consumers.

Liberals believe in government regulation to address economic and social issues. They support regulation of private industry, opposition to corporate monopolies, and the promotion of labour rights. They are generally willing to experiment with large-scale social change to enhance individual freedom and opportunity. For instance, liberals have supported civil rights laws and regulations, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the expansion of voting rights to all citizens, including women and racial minorities.

In conclusion, liberals in the United States advocate for a mixed economy, government regulation, and labour rights as part of their broader commitment to individual freedom, equality, and social justice. They recognise that economic and social inequalities can hinder individuals' ability to realise their full potential, and thus support governmental intervention to address these issues.

Liberals support social justice, diversity, and access to education and healthcare

Liberalism, often referred to as modern liberalism, is the dominant version of liberalism in the United States. It combines ideas of civil liberty and equality with support for social justice, diversity, and access to education and healthcare.

Liberals support social justice and diversity, with a commitment to civil liberties and individual rights. They believe in using the government to address social and economic issues, such as economic inequality, poverty, racial tensions, and inadequate labour unions. Liberals endorse public spending on education, healthcare, and welfare, with a focus on improving access to quality healthcare, including mental healthcare, for all Americans.

Modern liberalism has its roots in the progressive movement of the late 19th century, which sought to transform social problems into moral ones and address issues such as economic inequality, voting rights for minorities, and women's rights. Important social issues for liberals in the 21st century include social justice, economic inequality, affirmative action, LGBT rights, and immigration reform. Liberals believe that the government has a role in promoting equality and addressing social issues.

Access to education is a key aspect of liberalism, with a focus on ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity to receive a quality education. Liberals support public spending on education and believe that education is a fundamental right that should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their background or socioeconomic status. They also support labour rights and oppose corporate monopolies, working to empower labour unions and ensure fair labour practices.

Liberals generally support laws and policies that promote access to healthcare, including mental healthcare, for all Americans. They believe that healthcare is a right and that the government has a responsibility to ensure that all individuals have access to quality, affordable healthcare. Liberals endorse public spending on healthcare and support laws such as the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), which requires insurance companies to provide equal coverage for mental health and substance-use disorder care as for physical health issues.

Explore related products

The Great Flip: The Shifting Views of Liberals and Conservatives on Active Government

$12.99

Sir John's Echo: The Voice for a Stronger Canada (Point of View Book 6)

$9.99 $19.99

Crapitalism: Liberals Who Make Millions Swiping Your Tax Dollars

$11.99 $16

American Government 101: From the Continental Congress to the Iowa Caucus, Everything You Need to Know About US Politics (Adams 101 Series)

$10.99 $16.99

UNDERMINING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: How the Communist Manifesto of 1848 Blueprints the Actions of the Democratic Party and President Obama

$2.99 $14.95

The Common Good

$8.99 $18

Liberals believe in rationalism and individualism, while conservatives are anti-rationalist and anti-individualist

Liberals are often associated with rationalism and individualism, while conservatives are perceived as anti-rationalist and anti-individualist. These contrasting ideologies shape their respective views on various issues, including the interpretation and application of the Constitution.

Rationalism, a key tenet of liberalism, posits that humans are rational creatures capable of reason and logic. Liberals, influenced by thinkers like John Stuart Mill, believe that people can make decisions based on their own reasoning rather than being governed by irrational forces like superstition or religion. This optimistic outlook on human nature leads liberals to advocate for individual freedom and self-expression, as they trust that individuals will not undermine the freedom of others.

Individualism, another cornerstone of liberalism, emphasizes the primacy of the individual over collective entities. Liberals support small government, aiming to protect individual autonomy against obligations imposed by social institutions, including the state or religious authorities. They champion the rights of minority groups and believe in equal protection of human rights, civil rights, and civil liberties for all citizens.

In contrast, conservatives are often associated with anti-rationalism and anti-individualism. They tend to embrace traditional values and prioritize collective entities like family, church, and communities. Conservatives view the Constitution as a necessary constraint on inherently selfish and limited human beings, while liberals see it as an obstacle to their ideal of a more perfect society.

It is worth noting that the relationship between liberalism, conservatism, and individualism is complex and has evolved over time. Some sources suggest that nationalism, which implies "groupishness" and a degree of coercion, is inherently at odds with individualism. However, the influence of figures like Reagan and Goldwater led conservatives to embrace individualism to a certain extent, with a focus on individual rights, including abortion rights and gay rights.

In conclusion, while liberals are characterized by their adherence to rationalism and individualism, conservatives are often positioned as anti-rationalist and anti-individualist. These differences in ideological foundations shape their respective interpretations of the Constitution and approaches to governance.

Liberals believe the Constitution is irrelevant, and that Congress has stretched the interpretation of interstate commerce

Liberals believe that the Constitution is an obstacle to their goal of perfecting society. They see the government as a tool to achieve this perfection, and any limits on government power are therefore seen as an impediment. This is in stark contrast to conservatives, who view the Constitution as a necessary constraint on inherently selfish and limited human beings.

Liberals have been accused of having an inherent animus towards the Constitution, and this is reflected in their belief that the document has become irrelevant. When confronted about the constitutionality of their proposals, liberals often point to the general welfare clause, which they interpret as a carte blanche for the federal government to do anything proclaimed to be good for the country. However, this clause was intended as a general term alluding to specific objects, namely the enumerated powers granted to Congress by the Constitution.

The interpretation of "interstate commerce" has been stretched by Congress and the Supreme Court to cover virtually any action undertaken anywhere in the U.S. This interpretation has been used to justify the individual health insurance mandate in Obamacare, which many see as an overreach of government power. If Congress can force a citizen to buy a product from a private company, what else can't it do? This interpretation of "interstate commerce" has further contributed to the perception that the Constitution is irrelevant, as it allows Congress to regulate a wide array of economic transactions and activities, even those that occur within a single state.

The Necessary and Proper Clause has also been interpreted broadly by the courts to give Congress power over a broad range of intrastate economic activities with a "substantial effect" on interstate commerce. This has allowed Congress to regulate various non-economic activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, further expanding the reach of the federal government.

Frequently asked questions