Global Political Campaign Durations: How Long Is Too Long?

The length of political campaigns varies across the world. While the US does not have laws stipulating the length of a campaign, other countries do. For instance, the UK limits political campaigning to 25 working days, or about five weeks. In Japan, campaigning is only allowed for 12 days in general elections. Australia's 2022 federal election campaign lasted 36 days, while Brazil adopts a 'blackout period' where candidates cannot campaign or advertise. Spending limits are also a factor in campaign length, with countries like Finland, Austria, and the UK imposing limits on either contributions or spending, but not both.

Explore related products

Words to Win By: The Slogans, Logos, and Designs of America's Presidential Elections

$13 $24.99

Race of a Lifetime: How Obama Won the White House

$31.31

Marching Through Georgia: The Story of Soldiers and Civilians During Sherman's Campaign

$12.33 $27.5

Sailing Around the World - The California Campaign

$4.99

Heart Failure

$4.99

Racing Around the World Alone

$1.99

Spending limits and time limits

In terms of time limits, the length of political campaigns can range from as short as 12 days to nearly four months. The US stands out in this regard as well, with no laws stipulating the length of campaigns. This has resulted in extremely long campaigns, with candidates announcing their run for office nearly two years before the election. In contrast, other countries have strict time limits, like Brazil's "blackout period" where candidates are prohibited from campaigning or distributing advertisements, and the UK's recent 15-day limit on leadership campaigns. Australia's 2024 election campaign lasted 36 days, while federal elections in Brazil can last 90 days if both the presidency and legislative seats are on the ballot.

The absence of spending and time limits in the US has led to concerns about the influence of early campaigning on voters and the potential for vast sums of money to be spent. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of campaign regulations can depend on the broader media landscape. In countries with strong media regulations, time limits may be less necessary, as media coverage is already pluralistic and free from censorship. Additionally, the digital landscape has introduced new complexities, with social media sites reversing bans on political advertising, such as Elon Musk's decision to allow "cause-based ads" on his platform.

While some countries strive for a reasonable amount of integrity and civility in their elections, others prioritize free speech, allowing candidates to spend as they please. These differing approaches to spending and time limits in political campaigns reflect the complex balance between democratic ideals and practical considerations in the modern world.

Advertising and signage restrictions

Advertising and signage play a crucial role in political campaigns, and countries have varying approaches to regulating them. Here is an overview of the restrictions and requirements imposed on political advertising and signage in different countries:

Brazil

Brazil adopts a blackout period, during which candidates are prohibited from distributing any political advertisements or engaging in campaigns. This measure ensures a level playing field for all candidates, regardless of their financial resources.

United Kingdom

The UK imposes strict controls on advertising and signage during election periods. Candidates are not permitted to purchase advertising space in newspapers or airtime on the radio or other media platforms. This regulation ensures equal opportunities for all candidates, regardless of their wealth. Signboards are only allowed in specific areas and must adhere to uniform size standards.

United States

The US stands out for its lack of designated campaign period restrictions, allowing campaigns to span several years. While some social media platforms, such as Twitter, previously banned political advertising, these restrictions have been lifted. Currently, political advertising on television, radio, and the internet falls under the purview of the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates advertising rates and requires specific disclaimers. There are no limits on campaign spending, and candidates can seek donations to fund their advertising efforts.

Canada, Greece, Iceland, and Japan

These countries impose limits on both campaign contributions and spending. Canada allows contributions of up to $1,100, while Greece permits up to €3,000, and Iceland allows just under €2,500. Japan has a unique system, allowing contributions of up to 1.5 million yen (approximately $14,439) per candidate per year.

Austria, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom

In contrast, these countries focus on limiting campaign spending rather than contributions. While contribution limits are not imposed, strict spending caps help maintain the integrity of the electoral process and promote fair competition among candidates.

Influence of media

The influence of the media on political campaigns is a significant factor in many countries. Media coverage can shape public opinion and influence election outcomes, and this influence is often subject to strict regulations.

In some countries, advertising and signage are strictly controlled during election periods to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all candidates. For example, candidates may be prohibited from purchasing advertising space in newspapers or on television, radio, or other media platforms. This is the case in the UK, which also has a relatively short campaign period of 25 working days or approximately five weeks.

However, the US takes a different approach, prioritizing the principle of free speech, which allows candidates to say what they want, as often as they want, and spend as much as they want on their campaigns. This lack of spending limits means American candidates are constantly fundraising and are at risk of being outspent by their opponents. This results in lengthy and costly campaigns, with the 2024 US Elections seeing candidates announcing their running nearly two years before election day.

The media also plays a role in the early stages of a political campaign, as voters can be influenced by what they learn about candidates and their platforms outside of the official campaign period. Media monitoring teams often start their work well in advance of the official campaign start, and in the US, it is believed that the candidate leading on Labor Day (in September) will win the presidential election in November. This means that events and media coverage during the final two months of the campaign have little influence on the outcome.

In contrast, some countries have a "blackout period" before elections, during which candidates are prohibited from campaigning or distributing political advertisements. Brazil and Australia are examples of countries with such blackout periods, with Australia's most recent federal election campaign spanning 36 days.

Explore related products

In This Together: A PBS American Portrait Story

$2.99

On The Fly: Adventures at Altitude (TV Series)

$2.99

Digging In

$4.99

Stolen Elections: The Takedown of Democracies Worldwide

$19.99

Election

$7.99 $17

What's the Big Deal About Elections

$5.99

Election date flexibility

The length of political campaigns varies across different countries. While some nations have laws stipulating the duration of campaigns, others, like the US, do not. American presidential campaigns are known to be long and costly, with candidates often announcing their bid for the presidency years in advance. For instance, Donald Trump declared his intention to run in the 2024 US Elections almost two years before election day.

In contrast, countries like the UK restrict the length of campaigns, giving politicians a limited number of working days to make their case to voters. For instance, during federal elections in Brazil, a "blackout period" is adopted, where candidates are prohibited from distributing political advertisements or campaigning. Australia also has a limited campaign period, with the most recent election campaign spanning 36 days.

The length of political campaigns can be influenced by various factors, including the electoral system in place and the occurrence of precipitating events, such as a parliamentary vote of no confidence. The choice of the election date may lie with the incumbent head of government, impacting the flexibility of the election date.

In terms of spending limits, countries differ in their approaches. While some nations, like Finland and the United States, have contribution limits but no spending limits, others, like Canada, Greece, and Iceland, impose limits on both contributions and spending. The presence or absence of spending limits can influence the duration of campaigns, as candidates without spending restrictions may feel pressured to continuously raise funds to avoid being outspent.

Public funding of campaigns

Australia

In Australia, the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 provides for public funding of political campaigns. Under this Act, political parties and independent candidates can receive public funding for campaigning. To be eligible for election funding, candidates or Senate groups must receive a minimum of 4% of the formal first preference vote in the applicable division or state/territory. The amount of funding is calculated by multiplying the number of eligible votes by the current election funding rate, which is adjusted periodically to account for inflation.

Spain

Spain employs a mixed model for campaign funding, providing public funding for both ongoing operations and electoral campaigns of political parties. This public funding is not included in the electoral budget, and parties can also seek funds from private sources. The amount of public funding is calculated based on the number of votes and seats obtained. Additionally, Spanish political parties have access to free airtime on state radio and television, which is managed by a special commission supervised by electoral committees.

Sweden

Sweden's approach to public funding of campaigns is based on informal agreements among political parties. There is no formal regulation of campaign financing, but there is an agreement among parliamentary parties to share information about contribution sources. The four main sources of funding for Swedish political parties are direct public funding, indirect public funding, income from party membership, and lotteries conducted by parties or affiliated organizations. Direct public funding, which is provided during election periods and between elections, is the primary source of funding.

United States

In the United States, the campaign finance system has been criticized for favoring a small group of wealthy donors. To address this issue, organizations like the Brennan Center for Justice have proposed and advocated for small donor public financing. This system uses public funds to match and multiply small donations, reducing the influence of special interests and empowering average voters. New York City's multiple match system, where a $50 donation can generate $350 for a candidate, is an example of this approach. Other suggestions for public campaign financing in the US include voucher systems and tax credits for small campaign donations.

These examples demonstrate the variety of approaches different countries take to public funding of political campaigns, each with its own unique set of regulations and considerations.

Frequently asked questions