James Madison's Spin On The Constitutional Story

James Madison, the fourth president of the United States, played a pivotal role in drafting and promoting the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. Madison's notes, a day-by-day summary of the debates and votes of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, have long been considered the most important source for detailing the convention's proceedings. However, the reliability of these notes has been challenged by legal historian Mary Sarah Bilder, who argues that Madison revised his notes to a greater extent than previously recognized, potentially amounting to what we would now call spin. Bilder suggests that Madison wanted to create his own record of what he saw as significant in the Convention, and that he took steps to make his notes look like a full-fledged account of the historic event.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$12.29 $22

James Madison's Constitution: A Double Security and a Parchment Barrier

$15.91 $29.95

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787: Which Framed the Constitution of the United States of America

$30.54 $45.99

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$34.54 $39.99

James Madison His Notes on the Constitutional Debates of 1787, Vol 1 of 2

$18 $18

James Madison's notes were revised to a greater extent than previously thought

James Madison played a pivotal role in drafting, explaining, and ratifying the United States Constitution. He was also the chief author of the Bill of Rights and, thus, of the First Amendment. Madison's notes, "Madison's Debates," served as a significant source for understanding the activities of the Continental Congress and the frustrations that led to plans for a new federal Constitution.

Madison's notes, however, have been challenged for their reliability as a contemporaneous record of the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Boston College Law School legal historian Mary Sarah Bilder, in her book "Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention," argues that Madison's notes were "revised to an even greater extent than has been recognized." Bilder's research suggests that Madison's revisions began right after the convention and continued until his death. These revisions were influenced by the political climate and his desire to portray himself on the right side of history, such as revising his stance on slavery.

Madison's notes were not intended for publication during his lifetime due to fears of misrepresentation and controversy. He wanted to control the timing of their release and preferred them to be published posthumously. Madison's revisions transformed his notes from a mere legislative diary into a full-fledged account of a historic event. He filled in the blanks in his notes by referring to the official journal of the convention.

The extent of Madison's revisions has led scholars to question the reliability of his notes as a credible source for understanding the Constitutional Convention. While the exact nature and impact of Madison's revisions may never be fully known, his notes continue to provide valuable insights into the debates and deliberations that shaped the United States Constitution.

Madison's notes were revised to avoid misrepresentation by his political enemies

James Madison played a pivotal role in drafting and promoting the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. He was a member of the Continental Congress and served as secretary of state under Thomas Jefferson. Madison's notes, a day-by-day summary of who said what about each proposition put forth by the delegates, and how the votes turned out, are considered an important source for understanding the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

However, the reliability of Madison's notes as an accurate record of the Convention has been challenged. Madison's notes were revised several times, with the revisions beginning right after the convention and continuing until his death. These revisions were made, in part, to avoid misrepresentation by his political enemies. Madison feared that the publication of his journal would lead his enemies to mock him and that he would be drawn into controversy. He wanted to avoid the strict-constructionist approach to the Constitution and the potential for his notes to be used against him politically.

Madison's revisions also served to enhance his own role in the Convention and portray himself as a key figure. He wanted to create a record—his record—of what he saw as significant in the Convention. This included portraying himself as speaking against slavery, when, in fact, this comment was made by another delegate, Luther Martin. Madison, a slaveholder himself, wanted to be on the right side of history as it became clearer that the U.S. would pull out of the slave trade.

In addition, Madison's revisions may have been motivated by a desire to present a more polished and complete account of the historic event. He acquired the official journal of the convention and attempted to fill in the blanks in his notes, which were many. Madison's revisions continued throughout his life, with the aim of shaping the public understanding of the Convention and his role in it.

Madison's notes were revised to fill in the blanks and appear more comprehensive

James Madison's notes on the 1787 Federal Convention, which drafted the U.S. Constitution, have long been considered an important source for historians seeking to understand the debates and discussions that took place during the Convention. However, it is now known that Madison's notes were not a verbatim record of the proceedings but were revised and edited by him over several decades.

Madison's original notes were likely incomplete, and he spent time after the Convention filling in the blanks and making revisions. This was partly due to his desire to create a comprehensive record of the historic event, but also because he wanted to ensure that his notes portrayed him in a positive light and were not used against him politically. Madison was concerned about how his role in the Convention would be interpreted and wanted to control the narrative around his involvement.

The extent of Madison's revisions has been revealed through the work of legal historian Mary Sarah Bilder, who used forensic techniques to date the changes and historical context to understand their motivation. Bilder argues that Madison's notes were "revised to an even greater extent than has been recognized" and that they are not as reliable a source as once believed.

One example of Madison's revisions is his portrayal of comments made by a delegate from Maryland, Luther Martin. Bilder argues that Madison later attributed a comment to himself in his revisions, which bore a resemblance to something Martin had said in the original notes. This revision may have been motivated by Madison's desire to be on the right side of history regarding slavery, as the comment related to the slave trade.

Madison's notes were eventually published after his death, and they have had a significant influence on how the story of the Constitutional Convention has been told and interpreted. However, due to the revisions, the notes should be approached with a degree of caution, and historians must consider the potential biases and motivations behind the changes.

Explore related products

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

Rescuing the Republic: James Madison, the Annapolis Convention, and the Path to the Constitution

$52.24 $54.99

The Political Philosophy of James Madison (The Political Philosophy of the American Founders)

$26

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

James Madison (The American Presidents Series)

$14.48 $35

The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and The Bill of Rights

$3.97

Madison's notes were revised to portray himself on the right side of history on the issue of slavery

James Madison, the fourth president of the United States, played a pivotal role in drafting and promoting the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. He was born into a prominent slave-owning planter family in Virginia and was a slaveholder himself.

Madison's notes on the Constitutional Convention, also known as "Madison's Notes" or "Madison's Debates," have long been considered an important source for understanding the debates and deliberations that took place during the creation of the United States Constitution. However, recent research has revealed that Madison revised his notes extensively over the years, calling into question their reliability as a contemporaneous record of the Convention.

One of the motivations for Madison's revisions may have been to portray himself on the right side of history on the issue of slavery. While Madison had never spoken against slavery, he later revised his notes to attribute an anti-slavery comment to himself, which resembled a comment made by another delegate, Luther Martin, in the original notes. By the time 1789 came around, it became clearer that the U.S. would pull out of the slave trade, and Madison, as a slaveholder, wanted to ensure he was on the right side of history.

Additionally, Madison's revisions may have been influenced by his fear of political backlash and his desire to control the narrative. He postponed the publication of his journal out of concern that his political enemies would use it against him and that its incompleteness and errors would lead to a strict-constructionist interpretation of the Constitution. Madison spent decades improving his journal, making numerous emendations, deletions, interlineations, and insertions. He also wanted to create a full-fledged account of the historic event rather than merely a legislative diary.

In conclusion, while Madison's notes on the Constitutional Convention have been valuable in understanding the debates and deliberations, recent scholarship has revealed that they were revised to a significant extent. One of the motivations for these revisions may have been Madison's desire to portray himself favorably on the issue of slavery and to shape the historical narrative according to his perspective.

Madison's notes were revised to portray himself as a prime author of the Federalist Papers

James Madison played a pivotal role in drafting, explaining, and ratifying the United States Constitution. He was also a prime author of what became known as The Federalist Papers, a series of letters defending the Constitution. Madison worked with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay to write these letters, which were published in newspapers across the country.

Madison's notes, "Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787," also known simply as "Madison's Notes," have long been considered a credible and contemporaneous record of the Constitutional Convention's proceedings. However, recent research by legal historian Mary Sarah Bilder suggests that Madison's notes were revised to a greater extent than previously recognized. Bilder's book, "Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention," uses forensic techniques to date the changes and historical context to describe Madison's motivations.

Madison's revisions began right after the convention and continued until his death. He wanted to portray himself in a positive light and avoid potential controversies. For example, he revised his notes to distance himself from slavery, as it became clearer that the U.S. would withdraw from the slave trade. Madison, a slaveholder himself, wanted to be on the "right side of history." He also revised his notes to remove references to his support for a presidency with life tenure, which could have been embarrassing.

Madison's notes were also revised to portray himself as a prime author of the Federalist Papers. While the individual authorship of each of the 85 essays in the Federalist Papers is not absolutely certain, it is known that Hamilton wrote more than 50, and Madison wrote fewer than 20. Madison's revisions to his notes may have been an attempt to enhance his role in the creation of the Constitution and its defense.

In addition to his revisions, Madison also postponed the publication of his journal out of fear that his political enemies would use it against him. He wanted to control the narrative and release his notes after his death, when he could no longer be drawn into any potential controversies.

Frequently asked questions