Constitution's Role In Defending National Issues

The Constitution of the United States is a foundational document that outlines the rights and responsibilities of citizens and the federal government. It serves as a framework for governing the nation and protecting its citizens' liberties. One of the key purposes of the Constitution is to provide for the common defence and secure the Blessings of Liberty for the American people. The Constitution has been invoked in defence of national issues, such as in debates surrounding the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The Supreme Court has ruled on the Second Amendment, balancing the right to bear arms with the need to regulate certain weapons for the preservation of a well-regulated militia. Additionally, the Constitution outlines the powers of Congress, and Congress plays a crucial role in overseeing the executive branch and ensuring that laws align with the principles enshrined in the Constitution. Through mechanisms like Civil Society Field Hearings, Congress seeks input from local communities to address national issues while upholding the values of democracy and civic participation.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$229.76 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

The right to bear arms

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the "right of the people to keep and bear arms". The Amendment became law on December 15, 1791, when it was ratified by Virginia, the tenth state to approve the 10 Amendments to the Constitution, now known as the Bill of Rights.

The Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State", and its operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed". The Amendment protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not members of a militia or engaged in military service or training, to keep and bear arms.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution, but that the Second Amendment restricts the powers of the National Government from infringing upon this right. In the 21st century, the Amendment has been subjected to renewed academic and judicial interest. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held that the Amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defence.

The right to petition and assemble peacefully

The right to assemble and petition peacefully is a fundamental freedom in the United States, protected by the First Amendment of its Constitution. This right has been integral to the country's history, with various groups invoking it to protest against prevailing norms and advocate for change.

The First Amendment prohibits the government from infringing on the people's ability to "peaceably assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances." This right protects two distinct freedoms: the right to assemble and the right to petition. The right to assemble allows individuals to gather and associate with others for a common cause or belief, while the right to petition gives them the power to address the government directly and seek change.

The freedom to assemble has been crucial for dissenting and unorthodox groups throughout American history. The Democratic-Republican Societies, suffragists, abolitionists, religious organizations, labour activists, and civil rights groups have all relied on this right to make their voices heard. For example, during the Civil Rights Movement, nearly 200 African Americans, including students and the longtime congressman Jim Clyburn, marched from a church to the state house in South Carolina, chanting "Down with Segregation." This act of peaceful assembly led to a celebrated civil rights decision in the 1963 case of Edwards v. South Carolina, which set a precedent for other civil rights leaders facing arrest or governmental retaliation for leading peaceful marches.

The right to assemble is also closely linked to the freedoms of speech and the press, as recognized by the Supreme Court in De Jonge v. Oregon (1937). In this case, the Court extended the right of assembly beyond the federal government to the states, acknowledging its fundamental nature. However, the neglect of assembly as a freestanding right has continued in recent years, with the Supreme Court not deciding a case explicitly on free assembly grounds in over thirty years.

The right to petition the government is deeply rooted in legal history, dating back 800 years to the Magna Carta and receiving explicit protection in the English Bill of Rights of 1689, long before the American Revolution. This right empowers individuals to hold their government accountable and seek redress for their grievances.

The right to self-defence

At its core, the Second Amendment recognises the importance of self-defence, the defence of family and property, and the preservation of a well-regulated militia for the defence of the state. The inclusion of this amendment reflects the concerns of the time, as people were apprehensive about the new "monster" national government and sought to protect their security and freedom.

The Supreme Court rulings have provided further context to the right to self-defence. In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Court clarified that the right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution but exists independently, restricting the powers of the National Government. The Court also addressed the relationship between weapon types and the efficiency of a well-regulated militia in United States v. Miller (1939).

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision, affirming that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defence. This case set a significant precedent, as it recognised the core lawful purpose of gun ownership for self-defence. Similarly, in United States v. Schwimmer (1929), the Court cited the fundamental principle of the Constitution to defend the government against all enemies, further emphasising the right to self-defence.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$297.73

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$76.95 $76.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism

$59.81 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

The right to privacy

The Fourth Amendment, ratified on December 15, 1791, is often referred to as "The Right to Privacy". This amendment was created in stark contrast to the modern world in which it has been invoked. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, policing in most countries, including the United States, was largely conducted by citizens during nighttime patrols, while elected sheriffs and constables held formal leadership positions.

A key element of the Fourth Amendment is that every search or seizure of an individual's home and property must be authorized by a judge and executed on the grounds of "probable cause". This section of the amendment has been highlighted in several 20th-century Supreme Court decisions. In Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States (1920), the court ruled that illegally seized and copied evidence was "tainted" and inadmissible in a legal trial. In Nardone v. United States (1939), the court ruled that evidence obtained through warrantless wiretaps was also inadmissible.

In more recent times, the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the War on Terror led to a wave of mass surveillance, including the monitoring of citizens' luggage on airplanes, automated drones, and global Internet communications. Supporters of these measures argue that they are rooted in the "probable cause" of deterring crime and terrorism. Critics, however, counter that these programs are too invasive to be justified by the Fourth Amendment and that much of the data retrieved is irrelevant to potential court trials, illegally obtained, or invasive of personal affairs.

In Roe v. Wade, the Court used the right to privacy derived from the Fourteenth Amendment to encompass an individual's right to have an abortion. However, after the Dobbs decision, the Court overturned Roe v. Wade, and consequently, abortion no longer falls under the broader right to privacy.

The right to free and fair elections

The Constitution of the United States is a foundational document that establishes the country's governing principles and outlines the rights and responsibilities of its citizens. One of the fundamental tenets of the Constitution is the guarantee of free and fair elections. The right to free and fair elections is a cornerstone of democratic societies and is enshrined in the Constitution to ensure that all citizens have an equal say in choosing their representatives and shaping the country's future.

The Constitution mandates that State governments safeguard American elections by complying with Federal laws that protect the voting rights of citizens. This includes measures to prevent illegal voting, discrimination, fraud, and other forms of malfeasance and errors. The Constitution establishes a uniform Election Day across the nation for Federal elections, ensuring that all eligible voters have the opportunity to cast their ballots on the designated day.

To ensure the integrity of elections, the Constitution empowers each House to be the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its members. This includes the authority to determine the rules of its proceedings, punish members for disorderly behaviour, and expel a member with the concurrence of two-thirds. Additionally, the Constitution emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in the electoral process, with provisions for each House to keep a journal of its proceedings and make it public, except for parts that require secrecy.

To uphold the right to free and fair elections, the U.S. government, through agencies like the USAID, actively supports democratic elections and political processes domestically and internationally. This includes strengthening election management bodies, supporting electoral reform and observation, enhancing voter education, promoting a resilient information environment, and mitigating electoral violence. By assisting countries like Iraq and Ecuador in their electoral processes, the U.S. demonstrates its commitment to safeguarding free and fair elections worldwide.

Frequently asked questions