Constitution Vs Virginia Plan: Why The Constitution Wins

The Virginia Plan, introduced by James Madison at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, outlined a strong national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. It called for a bicameral legislature with proportional representation, meaning each state's representation in Congress would be based on its population. While the Virginia Plan was influential and served as a blueprint for the Constitution, it faced opposition from smaller states as it threatened their independence and power. This led to the proposal of the New Jersey Plan, which advocated for equal state representation in a unicameral legislature. The final document, known as the Connecticut Compromise or the Great Compromise, incorporated elements from both plans, including equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House. The Constitution, therefore, built upon the Virginia Plan while addressing the concerns of smaller states, demonstrating its superiority in establishing a balanced and inclusive government.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Federalism: A Very Short Introduction

$11 $12.99

The Age of Federalism

$26.99 $17.99

FEDERALISM: How Decentralization Can Save America

$24.99 $14.95

Federalism and the Making of America

$30.77 $64.99

Iraqi Federalism and the Kurds (Federalism Studies)

$42.39 $52.99

The Constitution was a collaborative effort, whereas the Virginia Plan was drafted by James Madison

The United States Constitution was a collaborative effort, drafted by delegates from each state at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The final document was the result of much debate and compromise between these delegates, and it was signed by 39 of the 55 delegates present. In contrast, the Virginia Plan was primarily drafted by James Madison, a delegate from Virginia, before the convention took place. Madison's plan outlined a strong national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.

Madison's influence on the Virginia Plan is undeniable. He is often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution" and his plan significantly shaped the structure of the US Constitution. Madison believed that the solution to America's problems lay in a strong central government with compulsory taxation authority and the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce. He advocated for a federal structure that would allow for more centralized power compared to the Articles of Confederation. Madison also proposed a bicameral legislature, which led to the current structure of Congress, with the House of Representatives and the Senate.

While Madison was the primary author of the Virginia Plan, he did not work alone. Edmund Randolph, then the Governor of Virginia, introduced the plan at the convention and played a significant role in drafting the resolutions. Madison himself acknowledged Randolph's role, stating that he benefited from Randolph's "distinguished talents, and [his] habit of public speaking." Additionally, Madison corresponded with Thomas Jefferson and others before the convention, sharing his ideas and sketching the main features of the plan.

The Virginia Plan was introduced at the Constitutional Convention as a proposal for a new government structure. It called for a supreme national government with a bicameral legislature, where representation in both houses would be based on the population of each state. This plan favored the interests of states with large populations, and it sparked debates about representation that ultimately led to the Great Compromise, shaping the fundamental workings of American democracy.

In summary, while the Virginia Plan was primarily drafted by James Madison, the US Constitution was a collaborative effort involving delegates from multiple states. The Virginia Plan set the agenda for debate and significantly influenced the structure of the Constitution, but it was just one piece of a larger puzzle that resulted in the creation of the US government as we know it today.

The Constitution incorporated elements of the New Jersey Plan, which advocated for equal state representation

The United States Constitution is a document that outlines the structure and functioning of the country's government. It was drafted during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which was convened to address the shortcomings of the existing Articles of Confederation.

One of the key debates during the convention centred around the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan, which offered competing visions for the structure and representation in the US government. The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison, advocated for a strong national government with a bicameral legislature, consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives, with representation based on each state's population. This plan favoured larger states as it gave them a greater number of representatives and, therefore, more power.

In contrast, the New Jersey Plan, proposed by William Paterson, advocated for equal representation for all states in a unicameral legislature. This plan was designed to benefit smaller states, such as New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland, by ensuring they had an equal say in the legislature, regardless of their population size. The New Jersey Plan also sought to revise the Articles of Confederation to keep more power in the hands of the states, rather than a centralized government.

While the Virginia Plan was ultimately chosen over the New Jersey Plan, the concerns of the smaller states could not be ignored. As a result, the final Constitution incorporated elements of both plans through the Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise. This compromise provided for a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives apportioned by population as per the Virginia Plan, and the Senate providing equal representation for all states as advocated by the New Jersey Plan.

By incorporating this compromise, the Constitution addressed the concerns of both larger and smaller states, ensuring that all states had a voice in the new government. This compromise was a crucial component of the Constitution, demonstrating the founders' commitment to creating a fair and representative government that worked for all states, regardless of their size or population.

The Constitution was signed by 39 members of the Constitutional Convention, reflecting broad agreement

The US Constitution, signed by 39 members of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, was a compromise between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison, outlined a strong national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. It called for a bicameral legislature (the Senate and the House of Representatives) with proportional representation, meaning each state's representation in Congress would be based on its population. This plan favoured more populous states.

The New Jersey Plan, primarily written by William Paterson, advocated for equal state representation in a unicameral legislature, aiming to protect the interests of smaller states. It also proposed adding a national executive and judiciary, and expanding the power of the national government.

The Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise, was proposed by delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut. This compromise incorporated elements of both the Virginia and New Jersey Plans, providing proportional representation in the House and equal representation in the Senate. This compromise addressed the concerns of both larger and smaller states, reflecting broad agreement.

While the Virginia Plan was influential and served as a blueprint for the Constitution, it underwent significant debate and amendments. The final document incorporated some elements of the New Jersey Plan, including the three-fifths rule for taxation and representation, and equal apportionment of representatives for the upper house of the legislature. The process of drafting the Constitution involved intense negotiations and compromises, demonstrating the complexity and breadth of agreement required to shape the foundation of the United States government.

Explore related products

Comparative Health Care Federalism (Federalism Studies)

$44.79 $55.99

The Ideological Origins of American Federalism

$28.01 $32

Competition among States and Local Governments: Efficiency and Equity in American Federalism

$29

Cooperation and Conflict between State and Local Government

$30.85 $36.9

Federalism and Political Culture

$56.99

Federal Constitutional Law (Volume 4): Federalism Limitations on State and Federal Power, Second Edition

$43 $38

The Constitution was a complete overhaul of the US government, whereas the Virginia Plan was a proposal

The Constitution of the United States is a document that lays out the law of the land for Americans. It was signed by 39 members of the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787. The Constitution came about as a complete overhaul of the US government. In 1787, the Constitutional Convention gathered in Philadelphia to revise the weakened Articles of Confederation. However, members from the Virginia delegation had different plans. They wanted to discard the Articles of Confederation altogether and start from scratch. This was the beginning of the Virginia Plan, which proposed a stronger national government with three branches: a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary.

The Virginia Plan was introduced to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by James Madison, a member of the Virginia House of Delegates. Madison had prior experience in drafting constitutions, having aided in the drafting and ratification of Virginia's constitution in 1776. The Virginia Plan outlined a strong national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. It called for a legislature divided into two bodies (the Senate and the House of Representatives) with proportional representation, meaning each state's representation in Congress would be based on its population.

The Virginia Plan remained influential at the Constitutional Convention and beyond and is considered the blueprint for the Constitution. The main parts of Madison's plan were adopted: a much stronger national government with the power to tax and provide for the national defence, and a legislature with two houses, a national executive, and a judiciary that shared power. However, the Virginia Plan was just a proposal for the new government of the United States. It was not a complete overhaul of the US government like the Constitution. The Virginia Plan advocated for a system of checks and balances within the three branches to prevent the same type of tyranny the colonies faced under the British.

The Constitution, on the other hand, was a complete overhaul of the US government. It was signed by 39 members of the Constitutional Convention in 1787 and established a new form of government for the United States. The Constitution laid out the structure and powers of the federal government, including the famous three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. It also established fundamental rights and freedoms for Americans, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, and guaranteed certain civil liberties, such as the right to due process and equal protection under the law. The Constitution was a comprehensive document that provided a framework for the US government and the rights of its citizens, whereas the Virginia Plan was a proposal for a new government that informed the creation of the Constitution.

The Constitution included the three-fifths rule, which the Virginia Plan notably lacked

The Three-Fifths Compromise, which was included in the US Constitution, but absent from the Virginia Plan, is a key example of how the Constitution took a different approach to representation and slavery. The Virginia Plan proposed that representation in Congress be based on the population of free inhabitants, which would have given more power to states with larger free populations, like Virginia. However, the Three-Fifths Compromise, part of the Constitution, counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes. This compromise gave Southern states, where slavery was prevalent, more power in Congress than they would have had under the Virginia Plan. While the Virginia Plan aimed to count only free inhabitants for representation, the Constitution's Three-Fifths Rule was an attempt to balance the interests of slave and non-slave states, and to strike a compromise between differing views on slavery and representation.

The inclusion of the Three-Fifths Rule in the Constitution had significant implications for the country's future. It entrenched the institution of slavery more deeply into the political fabric of the nation, and gave slaveholding states disproportionate power in Congress for many years. This compromise was a concession to the South and a step away from the more progressive elements of the Virginia Plan, which had envisioned a nation where representation was based solely on the number of free inhabitants.

However, it is important to note that the Three-Fifths Rule was not a unanimous decision and was a point of contention during the Constitutional Convention. It represented a compromise between differing views on slavery and its place in the new nation. Some delegates, like James Madison, saw the compromise as a necessary evil to ensure the South's cooperation in the new government. Others, like Alexander Hamilton, opposed slavery but still supported the compromise as a pragmatic solution to a complex problem.

In conclusion, while the Virginia Plan took a more progressive stance on representation by counting only free inhabitants, the Constitution's Three-Fifths Rule reflected the reality of a nation divided over slavery. This compromise was a significant departure from the ideals put forth in the Virginia Plan and had lasting consequences for the country's approach to slavery and representation. It is a reminder that the Constitution, while a remarkable document, was also a product of its time, shaped by the complex and often conflicting interests of the founding generation.

Frequently asked questions